269

The attorney for an Arkansas whistleblower has sent a letter to the state legislature claiming evidence that Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders’ office manipulated a document linked to her purchase of a $19,000 podium, according to the Arkansas Times.

The whistleblower also claimed to have evidence that Sanders’ office ordered a state agency not to respond to a Freedom of Information Act request for documents that were not exempt from the law.

The documents were requested by attorney and blogger Matt Campbell, who blew the lid off what’s come to be known as Podiumgate.

Taxpayer funds used to buy the lectern were reimbursed by the state Republican Party on Sept. 14—the same day Sanders signed a law that weakened the state’s Freedom of Information Act.

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] argo_yamato@lemm.ee 38 points 1 year ago

But who the hell buys a $19,000 podium? I mean how fancy can it be?

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cup holders, warming oven, cushioned support for long speeches, multiple colors and intensity settings for LED and incandescent lighting, fully digital, AI features, Shopify integration, Corinthian leather palm rests, spring released gavel, fully remote controlled locomotion while in use, spit guard, option to attach chain link front when speechifying in Honky Tonk venues, dog doo bag dispenser, catheter, and Bluetooth. Charges with usb micro 2.0.

[-] vettnerk@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Did you just invent a gamer podium?

[-] Tronn4@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago
[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

On people demanding documentation via FOIA

[-] Fraylor@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Of fucking course it'd use a USB micro

[-] darvocet@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago

Do you cath?

[-] argo_yamato@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Haha yeah it had to be the LED version that pushed the cost up

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

In all seriousness, custom ordered, using expensive rare woods, hand carvings, rush ordered from a master woodworker... I could see the cost getting up there.

But most government hardwood I've seen tends to be common (affordable) American species like oak and walnut. Because, well, it's supposed to be a representation of America.

So yeah, probably embezzlement.

Could be a kickback or favour to a buddy

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Embezzlement

theft or misappropriation of funds placed in one's trust or belonging to one's employer.

Alright, I finally looked up that word.

[-] Techmaster@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Walnut definitely isn't what I would call affordable.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cheaper than something like Teak...

Edit - Also, to be fair, I usually see American oak and Mahogany used in city halls, etc. Don't see much walnut, probably just because it's dark coloring isn't great for public spaces. But IIRC, I've seen a few old floors made with it.

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 year ago

It's about as fancy as a $1000 podium, but it comes with kickbacks

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago

Someone who owns a podium company through a maze of shell corporations or someone who has money that needs laundering?

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Lizz Truss' (UK prime minister for 49 days) podium was £4,000. It wasn't used for 49 days straight either.

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Someone also paying for something other than a podium.

[-] jdf038@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

I bet it doesn't even have a cup holder

[-] Brkdncr@artemis.camp 2 points 1 year ago

It’s probably built with Kevlar or steel, is height adjustable, and includes the electronic displays and equipment. Then maybe they bought two or three of them from a contractor that has security clearance.

Or it’s just a cheap one that had its price jacked up for no reason. Had they not fudged the numbers and included a build list that had redactions on it, it wouldn’t be a big deal.

[-] finthechat@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

It's most likely it was bought as a favor for someone rather than because it was a super duper awesome Podium 9000

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Made from a solid walnut slab and black epoxy with a live edge by a... certain youtuber.

[-] HWK_290@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

The same people who buy soundproof booths and "tactical pants"

[-] whatupwiththat@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago

The don't even try to hide the Grift (theft) anymore ~ Blatantly pilfering the States Coffers til her loss, Man WHAT a SCAM!!

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 22 points 1 year ago

$19,000 podium

sorry, what?

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Money laundering or other fuckery.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

Has to be. Even with custom carving, etc, that is absurd.

[-] dditty@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Ahh ty so obvious now that u say it

[-] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Nope, they exist.

[-] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

Man, fuck that shit.

What really gets me now is that’s not even the “business” price.

[-] Fraylor@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

C'mon bro, only 550 for 24 months!

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

It’s got a sound system but you can’t even drive it anywhere!

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bet that even SNL's motorized podium didn't cost 19 Grand.

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
269 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19097 readers
1942 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS