55
submitted 2 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago
[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago

That's a lot of jobs.

Sorry guys, the only way to pressure republicans to take action is a lot more of this.

Good luck.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's also on top of the 12,000 that were cut last year.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

A common running thread among fascists is being fantasist. Trump's tariff threat to force companies to re-shore is one of those fantasies. His plan makes sense if we are still living in 19th century when gunboat diplomacy, economic warfare, colonialism, or the general mindset of "might makes right" still works. But such reality has long gone and the world now has to be mulitateral. What Trump is doing is regression.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

trump himself has uses these tactics all his life, when he was getting sued or trying to get free service out of people.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

That's true. His impeachment proceedings got distracted with the assassination of Khassem Soleimani in January 2020, and then COVID happened.

[-] lemmylump@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Gee what state has a UPS hub, and is also getting hit by tariffs on Bourbon and gave us the fucking turtle that is responsible for all this?

Oh yeah, Kenfucky!

The dominos are falling, by September there might be enough fat leopards and faceless fuckhead banging on their GOP fascist doors to maybe get them worried, but only time will tell.

[-] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I cancelled Prime after Bezos was hanging out at the inauguration. It's all garbage anyway. Let it burn. Good luck to those who need a job.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

The larger issue is AWS (Amazon Web Services) which generates more than 70% of Amazon's profits. The retail side is almost inconsequential.

I haven’t used AWS for any personal stuff in a while, but as someone who’s been in the field for near on two decades, the institutional inertia behind “cloud == AWS” is frustratingly pervasive over the tech industry at large.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago

AWS is unavoidable, other clouds are barely a blip for now. But even if the other clouds surpassed AWS, it's not like that's an improvement. Google Cloud? Oracle Cloud? Microsoft Cloud? Are you really going to bat for them just because Amazon = Bezos?

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

and they only kept WF shopping around as PR, eventhough they know its cost them more keeping it around. when Prime left some wf stores and consiladated after they introduced the 9.95fee, they suffered alot revenue wise. because prime was also boosting in-store traffic as well as online buying.

[-] pahlimur@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Prime used to be great for lots of things. Specifically heavy things. Now it's 50% more than even using UPS or fedex to ship something like car parts to my door.

[-] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I pay monthly to get free shipping on things that I realized I didn't even need in the first place. I haven't bought anything in a month, and realized that I was buying things only because I could, not because I needed them.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

i needed to buy something off amazon unfortunately, because of the tariffs i needed to stock up on so i dont need to buy it again for a long time. allergy meds, pain meds,,,etc.

[-] blakenong@lemmings.world 0 points 2 months ago

I bought a 3d printer. Now all I buy is filament (plastic)

[-] Nyticus@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 2 months ago

Man I get a little tense when I see thousands of jobs cut at a time.

That's a lot of people to compete with in the job market and a lot more people who're now struggling to compete with the other thousands who lost their jobs.

BUT 'EM PROFITS!!!

[-] thedruid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I feel incredibly bad for them. I've been through it 4 times. Every time everyone else shrugged and said oh well that's business.

Now we're seeing how deadly and not normal layoffs are. And no I am not happy these people losses their jobs. Their families did nothing wrong and because of leadership failures, the rank and file get screwed over

People commit to working for a company. Companies need to have that same commitment for their workers. When shit goes bad , every leader should go before a single rank and file employee gets cut.

Enough.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

and then the dwindling "skilled" jobs are getting more competitive than they already are because of the cuts.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

What? Is that headline in English?

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Yes. They beat earnings estimates, but they are cutting jobs in anticipation of fewer Amazon shipments because tariffs.

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Record profits! Job cuts! Capitalism, baby!

[-] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

This is just saying they're using their brain to recognize that there is a coming slow down.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Trump White House is now in damage control mode figuring out how to hide the real unemployment figures.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

dint expect a coked out and ketamined out fiend to do thing so much damage in a short amount of time.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 months ago

My brother's best friend since high school drives for UPS. I just emailed my Trump-voting mother to let her know that she may have voted for him to lose his job. Fucking tragic.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

did you get a response, is she likely to double down or trying deflect the issue.

this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
55 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24733 readers
1602 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS