56
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 32 points 16 hours ago
[-] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 30 points 18 hours ago
[-] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 19 hours ago

We all agree they're getting shot down right?

[-] Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 6 hours ago

They aren't taking them out of the sky. Let's just say Ansarallah are directly responsible for their destruction.

[-] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 17 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

No they're not getting shot down directly, because Ansarallah/the Houthis have never claimed a shoot down during their public statements (while they are very quick to claim the shootdown of MQ-9 Reaper drones for instance), Yemen don't have the systems to shoot down aircraft hundreds of kilometres out at sea where the losses take place, and there's been no evidence presented of manned US aircraft going down over Yemeni soil, no wreckage, no ejections over Yemen, no search and rescue missions for the pilots, no pilots captured by the Yemeni Armed Forces.

However, the F-18 losses are still a result of Ansarallah/Houthi attacks on the aircraft carrier. So still as a result of Ansarallah/Houthi attacks, even though they're not being shot down directly. As for the three F-18s lost by the USS Harry Truman aircraft carrier during it's 7½ month deployment, here's a breakdown:

  • First during a friendly fire incident: F-18 in mid air refueling configuration (F-18s can refuel other F-18s) went out to hunt a drone, upon returning to its regular flight path, an air defence operator on the USS Gettysburg lit it up with an SM-2 thinking it was the drone.

  • Second fell out of the hangar bay with tow truck attached during evasive maneuvers, during an Anti Ship Ballistic Missile (ASBM) attack.

  • Third had an arrestor hook malfunction, while trying to land during an ASBM attack.

[-] stink@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 18 hours ago

Considering the military generally recruits people who have nothing else going for them, I can imagine they just keep forgetting to put the planes in park

[-] Gucci_Minh@hexbear.net 16 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Not far from the truth, long deployments and exhaustion will lead to negligence. The previous one was due to an arrestment failure, so the plane couldn't hook on and overshot the deck, but I would not be surprised if someone forgot to secure some chains and a plane rolled off for the one before that.

[-] chesmotorcycle@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 14 hours ago

Yeah, it's one thing to lose a single plane to an accident. But 3? No way.

[-] engelsaxons@hexbear.net 15 points 19 hours ago
[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 15 points 19 hours ago

These planes and pilots are well prepared for arrestment failures. genuinely surprised that was what caused this most recent crash

[-] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 9 points 14 hours ago

they were under ASBM attack at the time, causing things to get hectic and the carrier to be doing evasive maneuvers

[-] fox@hexbear.net 11 points 16 hours ago

It's a long deployment and much more active than they usually are. They're likely getting fatigued and overlooking things.

[-] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 6 points 11 hours ago

they also were under missile attack during the last 2 losses, and drone attack during the 1st. Ansarallah has directly caused these losses, it's not just American failure it's the effective actions of the world's bravest troops

this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
56 points (98.3% liked)

World News

2593 readers
142 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS