304
Marshmallow Test (lemmus.org)
submitted 11 months ago by sundray@lemmus.org to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago

I would give you an upvote now, but I'd rather delay my gratification give you 2 later

[-] dbbljack@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago

The original experiment boils down to being a zip code test anyway

[-] anachrohack@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago
[-] sundray@lemmus.org 71 points 11 months ago

"The Stanford marshmallow experiment was a study on delayed gratification in 1970 led by psychologist Walter Mischel, a professor at Stanford University.[1] In this study, a child was offered a choice between one small but immediate reward, or two small rewards if they waited for a period of time."

The joke is that in this version of the experiment, the child isn't being tested, the marshmallow is. And in this case, the marshmallow has decided to eat this one child instead of waiting until later, when it would have been allowed to eat two children.

[-] anachrohack@lemmy.world 90 points 11 months ago

Oh shit, I totally didn't see that the marshmallow was biting the kid. The image is so small it looked like a power outlet behind him on the wall

[-] Acamon@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Same, was confused until I zoomed in.

[-] riquisimo@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Same! Man this really needs an edit where the marshmallow is biting from there opposite side of his arm.

[-] xorollo@leminal.space 18 points 11 months ago

Thanks. I didn't see the marshmallow chewing on the kids arm till I read this then zoomed in. Lol

[-] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 18 points 11 months ago

I always found this study to be lacking...

5 minutes is not worth 1 marshmallow. Marshmallows are not that good, so one is way enough. As a kid, I could never trust adults who wanted to limit good things. Who's to say the strange adult in a white coat would really bring a 2nd marshmallow? What if they actually remove the marshmallow instead?

In short, it can only separate kids in two groups: the blind followers of authority and the other ones.

[-] TheFlopster@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

This is what I've said since I learned of this experiment. I'm only waiting for the second marshmallow if BOTH of the following statements are true:

  1. I want two marshmallows.

  2. I trust the adult to keep his word.

[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago

As a kid, I could never trust adults who wanted to limit good things.

Guess what? This effect has been found in other experiments!

The marshmallow experiment is one of those that self-help gurus and LinkedIn 'influencers' love to peddle as being meaningful, in no small part because it tells people who had lucky upbringings that they are inherently better than others, and not just a product of their environment. But when it's actually examined critically, it falls apart.

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 11 months ago

Time to calculate how much 1 marshmallow is worth in time considering minimum wage in my country.

Let's begin.
Minimum wage in Slovakia is €4.69/h.
An 80g bag of Jojo marshmallows is €1.19 at Tesco.
It claims one portion is 3 marshmallows which is 11.7g.
Therefore 1 marshmallow is 3.9g.
Therefore there are 20 - 21 marshmallows in the bag.
Therefore 1 marshmallow costs roughly €0.058.
€4.69/h is €0.078/m or €0.0013/s.
Therefore, 1 marshmallow costs roughly 44.62 seconds of work time.

Well, assuming there are no taxes. So maybe something close to 1 minute per marshmallow. Although... maybe if we add total time, including time you're not working... 12 marshmallows an hour, 288 a day, 2016 a week, 8640 a month. That's €501.12/month.

Based on this the minimum monthly wage after taxes and all is €661.80/month.

Conclusion: It is worth the 5 minutes.

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago

Marshmallows are bad. 2 would be a punishment.

[-] riquisimo@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

They should have done cookies instead.

And sweeten the deal. 1 cookie or a BAG.. Yeah, give me a BAG it cookies, yeah. I'm an ADULT.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 11 months ago

We did this in church with maltesars

[-] sundray@lemmus.org 1 points 11 months ago

Way better than marshmallows!

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 11 months ago

I think we were also given 3. We were given one at the start of the small sunday school class, and if we had it at the end of it, we were given three more. So the difference was that if you ate it early, you still would have had to wait anyway.

[-] Genius@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 months ago

Won't it melt from the heat in your hand/pocket? I ain't having chocolate stains in my pocket, I'm eating it now.

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago
[-] anachrohack@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

I know what the marshmallow test is; I don't get the joke in the comic. It depicts one of the kids who didn't wait. Where's the joke?

[-] 5too@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

It's not the kid who didn't wait...

[-] Nighed@feddit.uk 5 points 11 months ago

The marshmallow is eating the kid, not the other way round.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

I think it's that he waited 5 seconds and got zero marshmellows?

Or he ate it already between the 2nd and 3rd panel, and is demanding the second one?

[-] dmention7@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

I didn't get it til another poster pointed it out -- instead of the kid eating the marshmallow, the marshmallow is biting the kid's arm.

I glanced over the comic a couple times, and each time I saw the kid tossing the marshmallow in the air as if to catch it in his mouth.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago
[-] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 10 points 11 months ago

A shower thought about the original experiment:

It may have only measured how effective "waiting for future gains" was, as a strategy, for each child, in their circumstance.

So the real discovery may be only that the children already had a pretty good idea how promising their own futures were. :(

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Or hungrier kids (aka poorer kids) get the marshmallow first. Or those in greater need of serotonin (at least I think it's serotonin) you get from sugar, etc. There's a variety of issues here, but that's true of most "experiments" that aren't actually randomized controlled trial experiments.

[-] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Or they're just natural born addicts like myself and need that instant reward and think to hell with my future self. That's his problem. Present me just got a marshmallow.

[-] whelk@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

Hobbes will avenge him

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 months ago

Store-bought marshmallows are one of those things where I only really want one.

There's an ice cream shop few towns over that makes fresh, exotic flavored marshmallows, depending on the day they're better than sex. But even those are about the size your fist and honestly two would be a little bit too much.

[-] D_C@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Itt:
People not seeing the marshmallow speak, or bite the kid. Or the horrified look on the kids face.

[-] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Oh my god THAT'S why his face is like that and THAT'S the joke. I really didn't get this comic.

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 11 months ago

The best play is to eat the marshmallow immediately so that the experimenter moves onto the next test.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

Such a silly experiment. You're gonna make them sit and be bored for five minutes with nothing else to do besides thinking about two marshmallows?

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 1 points 11 months ago

….will there be a new one every 5 minutes?

[-] waterbird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

sometimes i think about that kid in the experiment
who was sat down and told to wait some time
before eating the sweetness put in front of him

that his patience would bring a reward

and i think about how they laughed when he didn’t succeed in waiting and instead
crammed the entire gummy bear into his mouth the second they left

looking so guilty afterward

the way they gloated and collected data and prognosticated about his future job prospects and potential success-
certainly not as good as those who waited, they said

it was something about self-control

i know all too well that when he got home
there were probably no sweets
or if there were, they were there for a moment only
before being snatched away by either cruel hands or circumstance
no guarantee that promises meant anything, much less that they were kept.

if it had been me in that chair
i’d have eaten it too.

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I don't know what study you are referencing, but in ALL the behavior analytic literature on "self-control" that I know of, the experimenters provide the reinforcement as part of the study. Not only that, but there are usually repeated trials with the same individual to establish a baseline and some sort of experimental treatment to see if self-control-related behaviors can be shaped. If the research is done with individuals who are children or have Developmental Disabilities, they usually ask that whatever the reinforcers are be restricted for some amount of time prior to experimental sessions to minimize outside influence on the study. So, families are usually asked not to give that specific candy, or whatever, to the individual during the trial, but there will be a handful of opportunities to receive some.

this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
304 points (95.5% liked)

Comic Strips

23409 readers
879 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. 😇 Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. 📽️ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. 📋 Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      ✅ Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. 📬 Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 🖐) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 🖐) will be removed.
  7. 🏴‍☠️ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      Sí, por favor [Spanish/Español]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS