222
submitted 2 days ago by tetris11@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There was this movie I saw once called Time Trap. I definitely would not call it good, but the premise was interesting.

Archaeology professor goes missing while exploring a cave which was once thought to be the location of the fountain of youth. His grad students go looking for him, find the cave, weird things start happening when they enter.

Spoilers below:The cave is revealed to cause some sort of time distortion which grows in intensity the further in you go. The professor who had been missing for days was only in the cave for a few hours. By the time everyone realizes what is happening, months go by, then years. They exit the cave at one point only to find an apocalypse has occurred, with the cave becoming the only safe haven for them to exist in at this point. Without spoiling the rest of the movie, the story plays in to the fountain of youth legend by including a group of Spanish Conquistadors and a tribe of paleolithic cavemen living in a deeper part of the cave, all living as if only days have passed, but in reality centuries/millennia had gone by outside.

[-] RexWrexWrecks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Hey, I'm upvoting you and all but I gotta ask how do you do the spoiler thing? I'm using Apollo and it made me click to expand your comment so I could see the spoiler part. How did you format it?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] weariedfae@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago

The movie In Time (2011). The premise was interesting but I can't even remember the plot because it was so meh.

I also think Idiocracy could have been better. It had good moments, and that's what most people remember, but the overall cohesiveness falls flat. Great moments, iconic scenes, but could have been a better film.

[-] polysexualstick@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Came to the comments to say In Time. I always have to remind myself how bad it was, because I really like the concept, so the movie tends to be much better in my head than it actually is as I keep adding things that weren't there.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I feel like the last 30 years of Star Wars movies could qualify here

[-] MintyAnt@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Disneys stance is to be middle of the ground on everything. Writers or source material bring in a ton of actually interesting stuff, only to be snubbed and half assed. It happens so consistently in all their shows. It's maddening!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I've always felt like Star Wars the original 3 (4,5 and 6) were a product of their time. They aren't bad movies but they aren't great movies either, but for whatever reason they struck a chord with the population in the late 70's and early 80's. George Lucas should have just let them be there really was no reason to make any more of them, but money.

[-] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 day ago

Not a film, but a TV series? It's called Jericho, and the synopsis in the Wikipedia reads:

Jericho is an American post-apocalyptic action drama television series, which centers on the residents of the fictional city of Jericho, Kansas, in the aftermath of a nuclear attack on 23 major cities in the contiguous United States.

But yeah, the execution is mediocre at best. Both the action and the drama are unbearably flimsy and cliche, even the argument flops as metal.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] A7thStone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

New Rose Hotel (1998) It's set in the same universe as Johnny Mnemonic, stars Christopher Walken, Willem Dafoe, and Asia Argento. I love Gibson stories and the short story it's based on, while not one of his best, could make a good creepy weird movie especially with that cast. Unfortunately it is one of the most boring movies I've sat through at least half a dozen times.

[-] spizzat2@lemm.ee 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Basically every Terminator movie after T2. They have some great "what if" premises that could add so much depth to the world, but then struggle to see the vision through is a satisfying way.

T3: Let's actually show Judement Day

T4: Let's show the turning point in the war against the machines (edit: and why people follow John Connor as leader of the resistance)

T5: Exists

T6: What if all this time travel actually branched the timeline? What would it look like if one of Skynet's terminators succeeded?

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 days ago

The Sarah Connor chronicles was the only sequel media that ever made sense to me

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.snekerpimp.space 49 points 2 days ago

Hot take, “Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy”. The radio play, books and 80s bbc show were not represented very well at all. They missed well over 75% of the jokes, Mos Def and Zooey Deschanel added nothing to it, and they added plots and scenes, I think just to get more “blockbuster actors” in, that ruin the original story of the radio play. Sam Rockwell, Alan Rickman/Warwick Davis and Bill Nightly were the highlights. One of the few movies I wish they would remake.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 44 points 2 days ago

Sam Rockwell as Zaphod was spot on. He was the only one who actually read the books, and had to even tell the director to add "Froody" to the script. What a shitshow it must have been for the director not to know that....

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 2 days ago

Not a movie, but a TV show. Revolution.

A sci-fi post-apocalypse show where the premise is that all of a sudden all technology (specifically anything that uses electricity) just stops working and nobody knows why. The show takes place 15 years into the apocalypse. The US has Balkanized into various regional states (although you don't learn this until later). Some regions have devolved into chaos while others have basically reverted to a steam-punk type of society. Since all modern ships use electricity, they've begun to revive large ships from the age of sail. The remnants of the US military at Guantanamo Bay eventually return to the mainland and try to reestablish a much more explicitly authoritarian control over the US. You eventually learn that what caused the global blackout was the creation of a self-replication nanotech which rapidly spread across the planet and shut off all electricity.

Great premise, but it got too much into the soap-opera CW-style of writing and didn't last more than 2 seasons.

[-] Didros@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago

It was such a good show, but man did they just keep pushing it

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] CptKrkIsClmbngThMntn@hexbear.net 65 points 2 days ago

In Time (2011). Time is currency in the dystopia in the film - paying for something decreases your lifespan, earning wages increases it.

The movie sets up a really cool class structure, wherein there are rich people born with/inheriting hundreds of thousands of years of life, and poor people barely managing to scrape enough hours to stay alive until they can earn more the next day. There are segmented areas of the city that cost years to get into.

Overall incredible premise, but the story wasn't exceptional beyond a couple of the cool mechanics you might expect based on said premise.

[-] Khrux@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 day ago

In time is absolutely an idea that I wish would get revisited for a TV show.

When I was a kid, for some reason, I loved the original West World movie, which is about 20% high concept and 80% "how do we copy terminator when all we have are a bunch of random Wild West, medieval and classical back lots?"

Obviously a few years ago HBO picked it up for a show, and that first season explores some of the richest philosophy I've seen on TV, in the way only Sci-Fi can; by building characters and technology directly around their philosophical takes and stress testing them. Also simultaneously it created an incredibly compelling story and characters. All of this stemmed from the idea "what if there was a wild west theme park manned by perfectly realistic animatronics?"

In Time may not have the cult classic reputation of the first Westworld but it's got appeal and charm, while being basically only interesting in it's high concept, and therefore perfect to pull apart and explore an HBO style branching plot. I bet you could get Justin Timberlake to appear in it again too, for added audience appeal. A show like this can also explore multiple characters in different classes, and those who interact with both. It's just wasn't that suited to a movie.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 53 points 2 days ago

Jupiter Ascending

They seed the galaxy and harvest whole planets to create an immortality serum. Fantastic world concept ... but a subpar story to make a movie about within that world.

[-] AAA@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was so hyped when I saw the trailers, because the visuals and ideas of the story they showcased were exactly my jam. But oh boy, what a dumpster fire the whole movie turned out to be.

Edit: yep, still goosebumps watching the trailer

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Tabitha@hexbear.net 32 points 2 days ago

Interstellar is like Neo-Posadism minus Marxism. The premise was awesome. Climate apocalypse and space travel. But the movie doesn't have humanity solve either of those problems. Instead it pops it's collar and says *don't worry bro, ~~the market~~ ~~Marxist space aliens~~ ~~some scientists~~ ~~a famous shirtless hot actor guy~~ fuck you who cares the green guy behind a curtain made a worm hole or something".

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Yermaw@lemm.ee 20 points 2 days ago

Twilight. My wife made me watch the first one and it's actually got a really interesting world and hints at a lot of decent lore and possible content.

Then they fill the film with close-ups of their eyes meeting across the room for minutes on end.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] phubarr@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] wolf@lemmy.zip 25 points 2 days ago

Wanted (2008) - The comics are brilliant, sharp, funny and intelligent. By leaving out everything smart/interesting from the comics they managed to create a mediocre action movie.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cattywampas@lemm.ee 22 points 2 days ago

Not a movie, but a TV Show. The Cape.

A former detective is forced into hiding where he is trained in stage magic, sleight of hand, circuscraft, and illusions. He uses them to fight crime.

I thought it was a really interesting concept, a more down-to-earth superhero like Batman, and stuff like this can plausibly happen in real life.

Unfortunately the show was so bad it was canceled mid season and the finale was only streamed on NBC's website.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mostNONheinous@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

Passengers had the possibility to be really creepy, I still liked it but without seeing Chris Pratts time alone first, we would have all been confused and on guard with Jennifer Lawrence.

[-] MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago

I think it would have been a much better film if the audience had also been kept in the dark about him opening her pod as well. That way we can also go through the range of emotions with her at the same time when she finds out.

Just start the movie from her perspective. Pod opening and Pratt is already there. He tells her his pod just opened and he's confused too. Then we get the whole "wandering the shipn for the first time" montage where they could drop subtle hints that it's not actually his first time doing any of those things.

His character is absolutely a bad person, but it's a situation we can sympathize with because being truly completely alone for any amount of time fucks with people badly. She has every right to hate him for the rest of their lives, but it turns out that if he hadn't done what he did they all would have died because of the damaged engine or whatever it was (I can't remember).

They could have made the movie much harder hitting and/or creepy for the first half, but they opted to try and make you sympathetic to his situation from the start.

It's the movie that always pops into my head when thinking about wasted potential.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
222 points (99.1% liked)

Asklemmy

48019 readers
862 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS