Can't fault Blahj on this one

There is zero value with saying shit simply to piss people off. You're not bringing a different viewpoint or trying to encourage dialog, you're just spreading anger and outrage. If anybody wanted that they'd be on traditional social media.

So I wanted to test it myself. I went to that community and posted something that’s only offensive to zionists.

What I wasn’t expecting is Ada’s response. She said in the modlogs she also felt the post was rage bait.

But you actually did post to rage bait. I’m not usually one to defend Ada, but in this case, you went there intentionally to stir things up, and you got exactly what you were looking for.

Posting in a place you don’t like, just to see what happens, is the definition of trolling. It’s not like how Lemmy uses the word now to describe anyone they disagree with. The real definition is posting something just to get a reaction.

In this situation, I'm saying YDI.

You're a month old account, approaching a topic in a way designed to maximise rage responses and arguments. Stop doing that

I went to that community and posted something that’s only offensive to zionists.

It got removed because the mod said they felt rage baited.

She said in the modlogs she also felt the post was rage bait.

Is Ada supporting zionism?

No. BPR and YDI. You went into stir shit, you got mad people smelled it and cleaned it up.

YDI. Rage baiting is a form of trolling. The point is not necessarily that your opinion is infuriating the mod, but that it's intended to cause intense discussions (typically between third parties) which often devolve into flamewars that are difficult to moderate therefore wasting the mods' time and deteriorating the community cohesion. If your plan was to have a constructive discussion about the topic, there's other ways to word it. But it's clear when you don't want to do that.

BPR/YDI. The fact you are doubling down on the shit stirring here confirms it was the right call by both mods/admins.

Pointless rage bait post. Lucky for you I think that's allowed in this community.

What I wasn't expecting is Ada's response. She said in the modlogs she also felt the post was rage bait. I didn't see that coming because I didn't think Ada was a zionist. I thought she would be fine with seeing zionists get angry, because they get angry over the most mild things.

Ada likely wants a civil community. Allowing ragebait of any kind isnt conducive to a civil community. It likely has nothing to do with the content of the bait.

YDI/YDM, you were warned to stop and were even given a temporary ban for it. The fact that you're here whining about it like you've been wrongfully treated proves you didn't learn your lesson or even get the memo.

Jfc, this is so YDI I can't believe you're even posting here.

I can’t even really make sense of this but I think the diagnosis as pointless rage bait is pretty accurate

YDI, you should take the message. Your ragebaitng isn't seen as acceptable. Now when people including the mod are calling you out on it, instead of stopping and disengaging you're doubling down and calling them Zionists. This doesn't help you, it's just going to make your situation worse.

Your post is bad, and you should feel bad.

Rage baiting is not nice. Stirring drama; is not nice. If you had a point to make, I think it would had been taken better. Rage baiting is not nice.

Bad faith intent... Not sure if should have censored but you shouldn't be doing that. It is poor decorum.

Discourse should be organic for it to have any value IMHO