63
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Carl@hexbear.net 40 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yet another arena where America is simply surrendering to China, although we're also plugging our ears and going "LA LA LA LA LA" by not allowing their cars into our country to compete with ours.

[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 29 points 3 weeks ago

Conspiracy theory: the US is intentionally trying to accelerate global warming because it knows it cannot win the economic war anymore and would rather destroy the earth than let someone else win

[-] Balefirex@hexbear.net 26 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Speaker@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

Dude has Burns right in the name. Nominative determinism strikes again.

[-] LaughingLion@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago
[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 17 points 3 weeks ago

Between the giant methane plumes satellites keep picking up over the US and all the billionaires who act like they'll be happy living out the rest of their natural lives in sunless bunkers, that does seem to be the shape of things.

[-] Parzivus@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

Why do you need a conspiracy? Capitalists will always choose short term profits, even at the expense of the Earth itself. It's that simple.

[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You jest, but this was something that snapped in me yesterday.

“If porky thinks extinction is ‘worth it’ for instant gratification, why the fuck would he care about long term profits if he thinks short term profits is worth dying for?”

[-] vegeta1@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

They're spiteful enough for me to believe this isn't a conspiracy

[-] KoboldKomrade@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

Mutually assured destruction brought to the logical conclusion.

[-] lil_tank@hexbear.net 38 points 3 weeks ago

Individual electric cars were already a shit solution but crakkker empire can't even bring itself to this

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago

retvrn leaded gasoline or libs

[-] frogbellyratbone_@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

i looked into this a bit more. The EPA gave out California a special privilege (the only in the country) to set vehicle emission standards. It has to ask the EPA for permission though, with only tiny scrutiny from the EPA.

California did this. It passed the EPA's tiny scrutiny test. California law moves forward for EV only in 2035.

The Senate is trying to use review of "federal actions" to claim the state law (california) is invalid. They're arguing the EPA tiny scrutiny and special privilege granted to California is the "federal action."

It's clever, but also a losing argument because the exception the EPA gave out is considered a "waiver" and not a "federal action" based on administrative law / legislative definitions.

having said that, SCOTUS is 6-3 so all of this really doesn't matter.

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

Chuds blame environmental regulation and safety standards for cars being more and more shitty and not capitalism, I'd love to see what happens when they scrap all of that in the coming years. It'll get even more enshittified

this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
63 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23824 readers
105 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS