82
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/technology@hexbear.net
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Bloobish@hexbear.net 3 points 6 days ago
[-] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 52 points 1 week ago
[-] footfaults@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 week ago
[-] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[-] TheVelvetGentleman@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago

The headline is pretty misleading. The solar maximimum lowers their time in orbit by up to ten days. The article also mentions that this is beneficial to SpaceX as it means the end of life satellites will re-enter faster, getting them out of the way for their replacements.

[-] WrongOnTheInternet@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

this is beneficial to SpaceX as it means the end of life satellites will re-enter faster, getting them out of the way for their replacements

They can deorbit them at any time though?

[-] TheVelvetGentleman@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

As far as I'm aware, yes. Maybe the article meant they could use less fuel to do so?

[-] supafuzz@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

any fuel is... already in space, it's not like they're getting it back if they don't use it

[-] TheVelvetGentleman@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

I just looked it up, and yes they deorbit the satellites, but their re-entry orbit takes up to six months. So speeding that up does seem advantageous.

[-] WrongOnTheInternet@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

I reread the article, I reckon it's about satellites in general deorbiting faster to avoid a Kessler syndrome scenario

Sean Elvidge at the University of Birmingham, UK, says this effect could benefit satellite operators like SpaceX by removing dead satellites from orbit more quickly that could otherwise pose a danger to other satellites. “It’s speeding up that process,” he says. However, it could limit our ability to operate satellites in orbits below 400 kilometres, known as very low Earth orbit. “It shows that could be challenging,” he says.

[-] joaomarrom@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

The article also mentions that this is beneficial to SpaceX as it means the end of life satellites will re-enter faster

then just this once our interests align, because that probably lowers the chance of a Kessler Syndrome scenario, which was always my main concern in relation to this satellite swarm bullshit

[-] fox@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They're in way too low an orbit to pose a Kessler threat since any debris would fall back down on a scale of a few months to under a decade. The danger comes from stuff that's at decade-to-century lifetimes.

Starlink sucks for a bunch of other reasons like the huge rocket emissions to put a bunch of astronomy-polluting garbage in space that's designed to fail.

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

They also have massively increased the level of aluminum oxide in the atmosphere from all the satellites burning up (something like a 30% increase over baseline), which might damage the ozone layer.

Apparently half of all active satellites are Starlink and they plan to increase the current number by ~8x.

[-] joaomarrom@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

holy shit, I knew it was bad but not that bad

[-] Meltyheartlove@hexbear.net 30 points 1 week ago

I remember seeing a post about someone on twitter complaining to Elon about his 250 USD monthly starlink bill turning to 1000 dollars and something about unreliability. I wonder how much further it will increase. doggirl-lol

[-] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

A family member has Starlink because they live in a rural area and I think it was basically the only option without cutting down trees. They both mostly work from home but anything past conference calls and email is dog water and gives me flash backs to 56k, like you can stream a show or play a game online, you are not doing both.

[-] Lyudmila@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Holy shit, at that point just start a jellyfin server so you can have Radarr download your shows in the background.

[-] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago

There's no possible way they could've predicted an unforeseen contingency like this.

[-] joaomarrom@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago

who could've thought that there was going to be a big bright and hot star just eight light-minutes away from the satellites?

[-] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago

:sicko-sun:

sicko-luna sicko-wistful

[-] buh@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago

alexa play red sun in the sky

[-] NewOldGuard@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago

I wish them all a swift return from orbit and minimum return on investment 🙏

[-] Owl@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

A deadly laser, you say?

[-] Lyudmila@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

now we are learning just how the sun's activity can affect [satellites]

Corporate Techbros once again retreading stuff that NASA and the Soviet Union learned in the 60s, because why learn from the past when you can make the dumbest possible decision at every turn?

[-] dumpster_dove@hexbear.net 2 points 6 days ago

People in the 60s didn't even have smartphones or AI, so I mean how smart could they be?

[-] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

big-cool Two scoops of razin', Elon

[-] D61@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

Elon Musk: flings car into space

Space: flings Starlinks back to earth

[-] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

Just a minor inconvenience

[-] grandepequeno@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago
this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
82 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23800 readers
167 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS