these are the same morons that block rules like 'bills must be read in their entirety by congressman before they can vote on it'...
you know, their fucking jobs.
reminder: these useless fucks get universal healthcare and are legally allowed to insider trade the stock market.
These bills are sometimes gigantic and no congressperson could possibly read the entire bill for everything they vote on. They are supposed to have people who read the bills and give them a summary.
Affordable Care Act is 1,100 pages. And then you have to remember that other healthcare proposals that got voted down were also similar lengths.
They're representative politicians in a supposed representative democracy.
The word representative means they are there in place of "the people" because you can't expect everyone to read and fully understand everything.
That is therefore the politician's job. They are not supposed to have people to summarise the bill for them. They are meant to understand it and determine whether to vote yes or no based on the needs and requirements of their constituents.
If the bill is too long or complex then they should vote no until they can understand the whole thing.
In the opposite of The Simpsons Governator, they are meant to read, not to lead!
The ridiculous length of most of these bills now is a major part of the problem. They are usually written on K St by lobbying firms and think tanks, then handed to favorable Congress critters to be introduced.
They are usually written on K St by lobbying firms and think tanks, then handed to favorable Congress critters to be introduced.
And that's not a new phenomenon. It had been happening since Reagan (and probably before that)
The Heritage Foundation was founded in 1973. It was probably still happening before that, though.
Ya, maybe bills shouldn't be 1000+ pages so that people can actually know what is in them.
This is a concept that somehow software developers seem to grasp, but lawmakers don't?
Try submitting a pull request with 100,000 lines of code to the Linux kernel, or any other serious project. Nobody is going to review and accept it because that is a rediculous amount of code to change with a single PR. How much more important is a federal law than a software project? Yet one will have maintainers pour over it line by line while the other the "maintainers" don't even read.
Isn't their length the point? Maybe half of that is about the topic, rest is lobbying effort from what I heard
It's intentional.
Literally every aspect of our democracy has been gamed.
Maybe they're so big because no one has been made to read the entire thing, and thus, been irritated enough to shorten their own bills.
Technically, they now get their healthcare off the ACA exchange. This change occurred in 2008
Their job is to get money for the party and to vote for what the party tells them to vote for
can someone go tell the Nebraskans to primary this guy out? he seems kinda dumb
He's a Republican in Nebraska. Being kinda dumb is mandatory for that variety of politician.
Nebraska votes for whatever isn’t blue. Whatever says “babies and Jesus” and “I promise there is no lead in your water” and “you aren’t dumb”
“I promise there is no lead in your water”
At this point I think they're promising to get rid of fluoride, not lead.
It's not easy but we could build a water softener that replaces flouride in the water with lead. I bet they'd fucking love that. Slap a trump hat on it and charge $2k per install. MADE IN AMERICA, BABY!
Even if they know that they're voting against the interests of their constituents, it won't change a thing
They have to bend their knee to Trump, no matter what
The same stupid constituents who are moaning now would also be complaining if he voted against the bill
What's that site that gives you the summary to start from or read and the numbers for your representatives? Probably time to link it again.
It looks like he was bathing with RFJ Jr.
You had one job. That you didn't.
He does not have to know every word of every bill. He does not have to read it, but then he need some serious reliable people who read it for him and tell him what is in there, especially when it comes to uboots in the law or technicalities. But he bears the total responsibility for what he voted for, and cannot claim ignorance.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News