368
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Both Trump and his "border czar," Tom Homan, have said California officials could face arrest if they're perceived as impeding ICE operations.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom pushed back against threats of arrest by Trump administration officials, remaining defiant as he oversees clashes between law enforcement agents and protesters in response to immigration raids across Los Angeles while also managing an ongoing power struggle with the federal government.

In an interview for MSNBC with NBC News’ Jacob Soboroff, Newsom called Homan's bluff, urging him to "just get it over with" and move ahead with the arrest.

“He’s a tough guy. Why doesn’t he do that? He knows where to find me,” Newsom said. “That kind of bloviating is exhausting. So, Tom, arrest me. Let's go."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

How exactly is Newsome impeding ICE?

They're talking about arresting teachers for protecting their kids. They are not talking about Newsome cuz he's sueing the government. But yeah, go and make this issue about your ego and presidential run bud.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

He’s not impeding anything, but Republicans love manufacturing an alternate reality that justifies their violent thugishness.

[-] WhiteRabbit@lemmy.today 27 points 1 month ago

Get em Gavin

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 month ago

Trump’s "border czar," Tom Homan, warned Saturday that immigration operations and the presence of federal personnel would continue in the city despite criticism from Democratic leaders who've warned it could further escalate protests. He threatened arrest for anyone who obstructs the immigration enforcement effort, including Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass — though he acknowledged that neither yet had "crossed the line."

Cross the line, Gavin. Cross the line and we’ll believe it’s not an idle threat. Until then you’ll always be Patrick Bateman to me.

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The illegal deportations were the fucking line that was crossed. Put those fuckers on the defensive and don't let them abuse language like this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 5 points 1 month ago

Don't think for a second Newsom is a hero just because he opposes Trump. He's a very corrupt individual.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Last time we fought fascism we allied with lots of adversaries to take down the larger threat. I'm down for doing that again.

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Honestly, short of some miracle undoing this whole mess, this was a flavor of outcome I was quietly hoping for. At some point, politicians are going to realize - much like the president's base - that they're going to lose power unless they mount some kind of opposition. For the very worst ones out there, power is kind of their whole bag. Take it away and they get very angry; they may even do something about it. It's kind of the tacit driving force behind any "checks and balances" scheme: power-hungry bastards trying to out-power-hungry-bastard each other. In a gross way, we kind of depend on it.

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

What is it about important blue states, like California and New York, that keep voting for corrupt pieces of shit(Eric Adams)‽ Again and again¿ Like I'm an out and loud proud social democrat in probably the reddest state, but it gets exhausting trying to juxtapose that with trying to tell people how corrupt every single repuglican is.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

This guy sucks soooooo much. I hate that he's probably going to use all this in a presidential bid.

It'll probably work. In the unlikely event we do have another election. I'll probably vote for him too. But he does suck when he's not taking advantage of a fat orange shitbag. Just remember that.

[-] Robotsandstuff@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Hi all, I hope people hear this and the post is not hidden. This is an insecure system, and talking on here about things you want to or will do will be used by the regime.

Please take this as it is meant. I fully appreciate the anger and the pain you are all feeling, and you are totally right to fight, but you must fight smart.

DO NOT LET YOUR ANGER GET THE BEST OF YOU. If this goes the way it's looking like it might, direct fights with whatfever is left of the States' forces is suicide, and the good guys need all the boots on the ground you can muster.

There are many veterans of the war on terror who are literal experts on the tactics needed to win this; seek them out.

Assume all coms are monitored because they are. Look after each other, people.

A friend who knows the score.

[-] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 month ago

One guy who's actively defying this orange turd and all the fucking tankies on here would rather shit on Gavin because he's not the perfect online liberal like they are.

You people are the fucking problem right now.

The American left is engaged in a slow and unconscious suicide. Meanwhile, conservatives are fucking evil as fuck.

[-] kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He's thrown vulnerable people under the bus and has no principles other than what he thinks will help his career. Yeah, he's doing the right thing here, but let's not pretend he's good because he's doing the bare minimum

We can work with him while recognizing he's not a true ally

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

When someone is cooking a good meal, even if they are generally bad at cooking, shut up and let them cook.

[-] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 month ago

Fucking this.

Furthermore, when people won't even cook at all (online leftists who do fucking nothing but complain), they have no space to complain when someone is doing any cooking.

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Only the sith deal in absolutes. Idealism is for idealists, aka tools. We are flawed beings, living in a flawed world, we have to deal with flaws. Nothing and nobody will ever be perfect for anything and everyone, that’s not a good reason to let fascists have their way. We can work out the details after the revolution.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"That kind of bloviating is exhausting."

Bloviate - talk at length, especially in an inflated or empty way.

Instantly added to my lexicon. There's another word I've often used when I should have been using this one, because the other word (malapropism) isn't exactly what I am meaning a lot of the time but it was the closest thing to what I was trying to convey (someone talking out of their ass in a way that tries to sound intelligent when it isn't).

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I keep a message chain to myself for new words - here's my most recent:

architectonics, antimonies, deracinated, vituperative, idempotent, moither, uxorious, voussoir, integumented, exuviated, entelechy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] pleasegoaway@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Gavin Newson kept California safe during the peak uncertain times of COVID.

Gavin Newson survived a recall that was initiated by the trump blowhards in Orange County and the Central Valley.

We do NOT NEED 2,000 national guards deployed to L.A. Trump WANTS to make things escalate, and 2,000 troops WILL make things escalate.

Your dipshit dictator is siccing military troops on citizens. This is war against citizens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

He's not perfect but Newsom's one of the few political figures resistance to the Trump regime can crystallize around. Yes I'm well aware he's the type of guy who'd like to find common ground with these assholes but he's at least willing to risk provoking Trump's goons into overextending themselves.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Well, shit. There's a lot to not like about Newsom, but I can think of 100 democrat politicians that would have folded like wet Kleenex by now. He could be a lot more aggressive about this, but he's clearly trying to exhaust all the normal channels. Critical support for Gavin.

[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

he's got a law degree, and passed bar, he's aware of what an enormous investment opportunity that level of civil rights violation would entail.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
368 points (98.9% liked)

politics

24872 readers
732 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS