57
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I met someone from Kansas and they talked about how it wasn't so bad and that they still can vacation to see cool places.

Then they talked about their 12 hour road trips to Wisconsin and Southern Texas and it made me feel kinda sad for them!

Road trips beat commercial flights though imo

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

There is a certain minimum threshold before bothering to take a flight becomes viable, and that's if your flight is about 3 hours long or more. Otherwise you may as well drive if you can, because the amount of time you spend getting to the airport, getting fondled by the TSA, checking in, waiting to board, standing around in lines, waiting for your bags to show up, renting a car at your destination, etc. all adds up to be the same as just driving. It's not actually any faster to fly when it still takes all damn day.

And then you can bring all your knives or weed or liquid bottles more than two ounces or whatever it is you're into without getting thrown into Gitmo and when you arrive you already have your car (or motorcycle).

[-] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

Hard disagree, driving from Bilbao to Seville is like 8 hours, the flight is below 2. Accounting for airports and commutes, the plane method is still about 4h, that's half the time and you can sleep.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I need to travel from the east coast to Denver and the only reason I’m flying is because work wouldn’t let me file a mileage expense for a couple thousand dollars.

[-] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 1 points 2 weeks ago

If it takes 4 hours to drive, I rather take a plane

After 12 hours of driving a car you're exhausted and could've gotten in an accident

If the plane tickets were cheap enough, I wouldn't even think twice.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Everything is driving distance and simultaneously, America is "too big" for high speed rail

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

High speed rail would make such a difference. If you tried to make the same trip as pictured with Amtrak, you'd probably be looking at double the travel time at least.

[-] stinerman@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

25 hours from what I can tell. And you can't take the full trip with Amtrak or at least they don't give an itinerary for it. You have to take a bus somewhere to hit the train.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

And due to how Amtrak's scheduling works (because freight rail is prioritized over everyone else), you're likely getting that train at a bad time days before the game. If I wanted to catch a train from my home to Chicago, my only option is Thursday at 4AM. Outside the Northeast, you're lucky to get one passenger train a week from your major metro, if at all.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Then people see this and go "see no one uses the train so why should my tax dollars go to fund it"

Imagine if we let drivers have 1 day per week to use the highway, suddenly they might not think their taxs are worth it for the service they are getting.

[-] shininghero@pawb.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

I once drove that long to get to a convention.

Never. Again.

Just because you can drive for 12+ hours, doesn't mean you should. Next time I'm either planning two full days for that sort of driving, or taking a plane.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Midwesterners don't just drive 12 hours for a weekend trip. 8 hours is the max for that

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

"Possibility," in that you can get from one to the other before the next game starts, and even sleep a bit, sure.

"Legitimate," I dunno. Assuming the series goes to seven games, that is almost 3,000 miles to put on your car in a month. There's nothing "legitimate" about that.

[-] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Are these the same people that defined "nearby" for linkedin? Because I keep getting emails about openings "nearby". The daily commute may be 8hrs, but that's nearby, apparently

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

If you say you're willing to relocate it basically starts giving you job listings on the opposite side of the planet. Usually in a country where the national language doesn't even use the same alphabet.

[-] DrBob@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Well there aren't any flights.

[-] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

I can confirm I'm from Missouri. Though to be fair where I live the closest major city is more than a hour drive away. Excessive driving is just an unfortunate part of life in the Midwest shit hole.

[-] qarbone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The Midwest is so flat, it's basically gagging for some tracks all over it.

I imagine the main concern was if there's enough population to use it effectively but that's surely not an issue now.

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
57 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

8273 readers
1571 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS