33
submitted 1 day ago by dessalines@lemmy.ml to c/rust@lemmy.ml
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 6 points 19 hours ago

Great, massive step forward. Rust’s memory safety will prevent potential PE vulnerabilities (and more).

[-] mina86@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 day ago
[-] drspod@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago

No user should notice. If it acts differently then that's a regression.

[-] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago

It looks like it's explicitly not a 1:1 replacement

[-] nous@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

It is not a full replacement - but they are aiming for

Our current target is to build a drop-in replacement for all common use cases of sudo.

They are dropping support for some of the older/niche features/settings and now ignore some of the config you used to be able to do.

Some parts of the original sudo are explicitly not in scope. Sudo has a large and rich history and some of the features available in the original sudo implementation are largely unused or only available for legacy platforms. In order to determine which features make it we both consider whether the feature is relevant for modern systems, and whether it will receive at very least decent usage. Finally, of course, a feature should not compromise the safety of the whole program.

But generally for all common use cases it should just be a drop in replacement.

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
33 points (97.1% liked)

Rust Programming

8822 readers
37 users here now

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS