43
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 12 points 3 days ago

Medicare used to be a point of pride for us as a nation, now it's more of an embarrassment. We're making fantastic progress on our path to becoming America Junior.

[-] BlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 3 days ago

I used to go to the dentist for annual check ups. Now I have been since 2021. That kind of thing has become a luxury that “one day I’ll have money for it again”.

[-] Joshi@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago

IMO there needs to be some regulation around this, a simple measure would be to tie Medicare payments to a pricing structure(eg. a specialist can only charge the Medicare rebate + 20%).

If a specialist wants to charge more then that's fine but the patient(or insurance) will have to pay the full cost

[-] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I second this, but make it +0% or else 100% private.

Honestly, we need most medicos to be employees (of the government), and they can start a union to keep conditions and pay appropriate.

Our subsidy system is just funneling money into practice owner's pockets, who set prices based on supply and demand, which is a fucked way to run a healthcare system.

Let's just pay the average medico more, while skipping all the profits were subsidising.

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 5 points 3 days ago

Seeing a professor for a complex health issue: $600

Medicare rebate: $80

Private health: $0

Medicare needs to do a LOT better for that to work

[-] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 1 points 14 hours ago

Part of the problem is that private health exists, but it can't cover you for anything other than hospital.

"Extras" aren't really insurance, it's a incentive scheme but you basically pay whatever you're using at cost.

The solution here is not to allow private health to cover the gap between Medicare and the out of pocket cost. The solution is to say, if you charge more than the rebate then it's 100% private, you won't get a cent of Medicare.

Watch as private healthcare absolutely bottoms out because they'll actually have to cover the whole cost, and therefore premiums will rise like crazy.

How we we afford this? We're already affording it. We subsidise private health, we pay insurance premiums. If you can convince people: oh hey, want cheaper health insurance? Oh hey, what's this? You can pay LESS in universal healthcare than you do in premiums!

Lots of people would go for it. A lot of us have private health insurance because of how the incentives are currently set up. We don't want it. Before the tax concessions no one wanted it.

You'd have to couple it with a massive investment in Medicare, completely removing all tax concessions for private health (which they should have never implemented in the first place). Better pay for medicos.

But we can damn well afford it now, just that it's politically difficult, especially with the corporate media, and everyone wanting taxes to go down (which I personally think is dumb as fuck).

We need to put private health in the bin where I belongs. Hybrid systems are shit.

[-] Joshi@aussie.zone 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yes, obviously medicare would need to increase the rebate and private insurance fees would necessarily increase(as they would now be actually paying for care rather than acting a a gatekeeping mechanism)

Rebate for a short consult with a specialist is $81.55, a long consult is $236.65.

The title professor indicates that they hold a teaching position and says nothing about their clinical skill. Plenty of specialists take the piss and leverage the title to charge ridiculous fees.

In my experience as a GP a reasonable standard fee for a specialist is around $300 with $80 back from Medicare. So yes the Medicare rebate would need to increase substantially but I doubt more than we will save when AUKUS falls through. It is within the capacity of a government with the right priorities. Also increasing the availability of public specialists would be a good companion policy.

[-] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago

All we need to do is tax the miners, and put the money toward healthcare, and whatever else we want with the money left over.

[-] Joshi@aussie.zone 4 points 3 days ago

Nationalise the mines and be done with it

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Would be great if they put it down as a long consult, I was there for quite a while with three "fellows" each checking me too. I was referred to a leading university clinic from a specialist ($$$ again) but I am sure there are plenty of profs or similar gouging because of an academic title

[-] Joshi@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago

To be clear most professors are senior in their field and usually indicates research as well as teaching, I was in a cantankerous mood this morning. But regardless Medicare needs to take access to specialist treatment seriously.

this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
43 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

4282 readers
126 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS