27
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

and since Advanced Protection blocks unknown apps, you won’t be able to side-load

Ah, there it is. It's a good decision while they're being repeatedly investigated for being anti-competitive.

[-] seven_phone@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

'Advanced Protection also prevents you from disabling ... Google Play Protect', I feel safer already.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

deleted by creator

[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Most features here let Google scan and evaluate what you do on the web, messages, and apps.

They say it helps security, but of course it assures those features are on letting them suck in more data about the person.

A company like Google doesn't do something out of the kindness of their hearts, they do it for profit

[-] Engywuck@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Some smaller ones can take a hit for doing good. Weird, how greedier you get the more assets you have.

[-] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I meant that literally every other company is after the money, not only Google or big ones.

[-] sykaster@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

It's not weird. When a small company does something like this they lose users and it could damage them. Google doesn't care because they know people will use them no matter what.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

If it’s made by google, I’m going to go with “probably not.”

[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago

I’ve been checking out the localhost tracking vulnerability and there’s something I can’t work out: it’s not even a terribly obscure or convoluted exploit, especially Yandex’s implementation that’s been chugging for more than 8 years over basic HTTP. It’s just a glaring sandboxing workaround that’s been exclusive to this OS for more than a decade.

No matter how many ways I look at it, I haven’t come up with a reasonable explanation for how it was ignored, by demonstrably capable engineers, unless Google itself had use for it in the first place. And that fits a pattern of selective competence in information security that they just can’t seem to quit.

In short it’s the data collection backdoors they leave themselves that defeat the otherwise top-tier security of their consumer offerings, and it’s why I’ll probably never trust anything they’ve touched until I’ve taken it apart and put it back together again.

So no, you probably shouldn’t use it. Trusting the privacy or security claims of any adtech company will always be a mistake.

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

72897 readers
1668 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS