120
The problem with militarism is eventually you run out of others people's teenagers.
Tell that to Russia.
Hey Russia, you're all out of teenagers 
A problem easily solved by having a recession.
This was what happened during the build up to WWII in Nazi Germany and Japan.
In fact, Europe is already doing so with their militarization budget. In China, anecdotally, I am already seeing more and more military recruitment ads. Not surprising given the high rate of youth unemployment in China right now.
We are going to see more and more military build ups across the world as the global economy enters a recessionary phase.
Same here in Canada re: military budget and military recruitment ads (targeted too e.g. at natives)
Obviously nobody is doing a ground invasion of Iran. It's so annoying seeing people frame it this way. As has been mentioned all over already, they're going to do the air bombing campaign of Libya, Gaza, Vietnam, Korea, etc.
They don't need to do some meticulous ground invasion if their goal is just to reduce a society to rubble. They'll just drop bombs and fire missiles until people are dying of water-borne diseases.
If I get drafted my life is actually just over
take an officer or two with you 
load more comments
(1 replies)
well, you've got to run out of violent sociopaths eventually
There's no shortage there. They just aren't interested in risking death.
Thankfully they have banned trans people from joining the military, and they've even started kicking out long time trans soldiers with a dishonorable discharge.
I started freaking out about a draft but then I remembered I'm 34 and trans so seems unlikely, unless they get very desperate. If they do I'm fragging my CO
The US wasn't ready for Iraq and Afghanistan, either. I remember a general on TV saying we'd need 4 million troops to occupy Iraq. We had 4 million troops total stationed across the globe. Still, Bush decided to open up a second front.
two dudes in glasses in the pic lol if I'm going to war I'm not doing it with my fucking glasses on
I know contacts will fuck you with chemical weapons in your eyes but tbh you're fucked then anyway and I need my peripheral vision and for my vision to not fall off my face
In basic they don't let you use contacts, they issue everyone who needs them identical glasses with identical sports straps.
If wartime I would recommend shatterproof eye protection, comes in shaded and unshaded, prescription and non-prescription. There's a reason why "operator" dudes all kind of end up looking the same, it's cuz that's what works.
How identical are we talking here? Just frames or lenses too?
As a long-time glasses wearer I don't imagine they'd be 100% identical, that would be near useless for most wearers who weren't like, -1 myopic if that were the only glasses provided.
Anyone with astigmatism or a higher prescription (probably starting at -3 and stronger) would be probably better off not wearing glasses at all than wearing mis-prescribed glasses, and at that point their eyesight would be too poor for standard activity.
Frames also need to increase in thickness as the prescription increases, because the lenses get proportionality thicker too. A thin frame will either be too narrow/weak to hold the lenses, and the overhanging glass is a physical hazard
Yeah, it would be stupid and counterproductive, but we're talking about the US military so I figured I'd ask.
Yeh definitely worth asking and tbf I don't have any special insight into how the military would do it other than the fact that I've walked around with glass in front of my eyes for most of my life.
I'm guessing maybe they'd have standardised frames and lenses that go up in gradations of 0.5 or 1, and can easily be swapped out. They probably wouldn't allow for astigmatism because that's different for each person so the correction may be off for some wearers, but so long as the degree prescription is okay they probably make do.
hmm okay "standardized" would be a better word than "identical", I'm pretty sure they give you your specific prescription it's just that all the glasses look the same.
Draft me I'm normal I can be trusted with a tank
They're so desperate I saw airforce recruiter pamplets in a tropical smoothie. I guess its the only branch appropriate for someone who likes "healthy" food and/or cold smoothies. (Funny since I briefly thought about the chairforce before realizing I didn't want to die for oil.)
But have you considered them using ISIS + The Kurds?
Good, stay that way.
Gil Barndollar is a former Marine officer and a current scholar of U.S. foreign policy and national security.
gil's been trying to get the draft reinstated for a long time.
i actually surprised myself by getting to the end of this piece. took a long time since i was shaking my head in disagreement every other line lol
Every one of you that has ever mocked a troop, ever shared that meme about serving crack before serving the country, or otherwise rebuffed the idea of yourself or someone else becoming a troop: your service has been noted.
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
120 points (98.4% liked)
news
24524 readers
640 users here now
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS