36
submitted 10 hours ago by sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to c/android@lemdro.id
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Still pissed about they cutting ties with custom rom community

[-] feef@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

What’s happened? Been using an iPhone for the last 2 years.

[-] ByteMe@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

They stopped releasing some stuff useful for custom ROM development. Like kernels etc.

[-] SqueakySpider@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 8 hours ago

JUST PUT IT ON THE BACK...

I hate that my screen blinds me and people nearby when I use biometrics. I understand the security problems with bio too, I guess I ought to just delete the option.

[-] moonlight@fedia.io 3 points 3 hours ago

*on the power button.

My s10e had this, and it's the best IMO.

You can also swipe it to pull down the notification shade.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 21 points 8 hours ago

Ultrasonic fingerprint sensors aren't optical like the older under-screen ones. They don't need to go bright to get a reading.

This will not blind you.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

The pixel 9 doesn't do the blinding thing anymore, and it works pretty well. This is apparently an even better version of that.

Don't disagree that on the back should be a thing too, the sensor on the back of the pixel 5 (IIRC?) was perfectly quick and had a few useful gestures you could use it for. I doubt it would increase the BOM much to just have both considering we're talking at phones that cost a grand

[-] dmtalon@infosec.pub 2 points 7 hours ago

Like others have already said the 9 doesn't use light/optics but it still sucks compared to the one on the back. I use, but generally dislike the P9 finger print reader. I've gone so far as not using a screen protector to help that stupid thing. Still has way too many error reads

[-] lath@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago

Considering this is Google we're talking about and they're moving towards the "Let's be evil for the heck of it" motto, is there a chance they're uploading the scanned biometrics for keepsies?

[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

In theory the biometric data lives in a special part of the phone hardware that the software can't (generally) access. It's one of the big deals about phone biometrics - it should be really hard to leak.

AFAIU, the fingerprint stored on the phone is incredibly low quality, so I'm not sure how much value it would have.

Could they mess with that? Yes. Is there profit in getting a really low quality hash of every user's fingerprint? Probably not worth the hassle.

[-] LostXOR@fedia.io 6 points 7 hours ago

Probably not. IIRC for security the fingerprint data is stored and processed entirely in the reader, and not accessible at all by the OS. Of course they could have some sort of backdoor that allows collecting that data, but that would be a huge scandal waiting to happen.

[-] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 1 points 6 hours ago

I'm sorry, are you trying to suggest that Google is now going to store and track every Pixel user's biometrics? Why would you think that? What's changed now that suggests Google would even try that?

[-] sartalon@reddthat.com 3 points 4 hours ago

Why would you think they wouldn't. Data is literally money.

[-] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 0 points 1 hour ago

This site is almost worse than Reddit sometimes with the hyperbole and the nutty takes. No, Google isn't about to abuse its position, squander decades of goodwill and open itself up to regulatory hell to sell biometric data to some mythical boogie man.

[-] Turret3857@infosec.pub 1 points 48 minutes ago

Why is it a nutty take to be concerned? It used to be a nutty take that the ability to be able to repair your own stuff was being taken away, then it was the ability for your cars to track you and to listen to you.

Why wouldn't Google save biometric data to get a paycheck from the US NSA/CIA/FBI for "terrorism counterintelligence"? What ethics or moral code hold them back from this. There are no laws in place saying they can't do this. All they have to do is specify some vague term in their privacy policy, and regulators would just have to be out-lobbied, which would be no problem for Google and their infinite amounts of money us in the bottom 99% will never see.

Corporations are not your friends. They do not care about you. They care about profit, and if they can make profit they will make profit. This is not an attempt to argue with you. You're allowed to have your opinion, but being skeptical of changes that corporations are making isn't a bad thing, especially if you end up being right so early that you can make a change.

Tl;Dr: write your legislator, tell them that you want better consumer protections, even if you think you already have them. It never hurts to make sure you dont get fucked over.

this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
36 points (89.1% liked)

Android

19446 readers
317 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS