Is reading comprehension really that bad? The argument is that Iran is on the verge of having nuclear weapons. The justification for attacking them is that they need to be stopped before they cross the line.

I'm not saying I agree with this line of reasoning, but the clear idea is that Iran doesn't currently have nuclear weapons.

Superpowers: I only punch down - fair flights are unfair.

Libya agreed to give up it's nuclear ambitions and look what Obama did to them. DPRK, despite seven decades of effort by the US to destroy it, is still standing. What lesson is a world leader in the US's crosshairs supposed to garner from these examples?

The west showing once again that the only way to be a sovereign nation is to have nukes.
And the west showing once again that for them international law is nothing more than a tool to wield at their discretion against their geo-strategic rivals.

If USA beginns a War with Iran, also Rusia and China do against the US. The EU in the middle between them

I'm old enough to remember when this was about NK

If only Iran had nukes...

If you think this meme format matches the text, you're goddamed wrong.

I’m sure Iran has a dirty bomb. They just are not insane enough to use it. They might be angry. But they are not that insane.

Well Russia has multiple delivery methods (who knows if the ICBM's are still operational)

Well, no, Ryssia has nuclear weapons, Iran is close to having the ability to produce a nuclear weapon. Ones slightly more immediate.

Lol I haven't seen this with young Jonathan Banks