14
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Pro@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

Sounds like a lot of Swiss newspapers are going to notice a sudden and drastic dive in their web traffic.

[-] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Absolutely correct, Canadian Newspaper pulled the same thing, but they also blocked social media sites from sharing or posting links to their sites, blaming the links were "summarized". Their argument was the links were being summarized and users were not visiting the Newspapers website.

So social media sites blocked all links of Canadian news, then Newspapers cried foul after a drop in traffic.

Funny enough when you see a summarized link, such as ones that show a picture and maybe a sentence, the content shown in that summary is directly controlled by the site being linked.

[-] abacabadabacaba@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago

They would rather stop showing those extracts in Switzerland than pay the fee.

[-] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

I think there already was case like this with either Google or Meta somewhere around Europe few years back. Or it might've been actual search results instead of extracts. The decision was overriden shortly as their web traffic dropped drastically. They'll 100% do this and don't think twice.

[-] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That happened in Canada as well a while back.

Funny story though, web extracts that become visible when you share a link for example on a social media platform or even through a text message are actually "controlled" by the source website.

This means the short summary that can range from a sentence to a few sentences is actually completely in the hands of the source website and is not actually "scrapped" when the link is shared.

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They'll blame this for more ads and enough people will say, "Oh, that makes sense."

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Clear copyright over reach. News titles or tiny excerpts should not copyrightable - that's just idiotic. If thag stops readers from reading your article then it was never good enough to begin with.

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
14 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73759 readers
757 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS