393
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 75 points 3 weeks ago

I get the impression that the cops are about to hate facial recognition all of the sudden, for no particular reason

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 47 points 3 weeks ago

There's a reason ICE conceal their faces.

They know what they're doing is wrong and don't want to be held accountable if their fascist rule collapses.

[-] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago

So just use one too and blend in. Put on a stupid Trump or racist hat, and if you are not white, put on gloves. Then surround them.

[-] Arcka@midwest.social 4 points 3 weeks ago

So which cameras can be used to overcome normal face coverings? https://piped.video/watch?v=yRFeS72IM6M

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] bytesonbike@discuss.online 30 points 3 weeks ago

Cameras. They fucking hate body cameras. When it clears them of wrongdoing, they have the video ready. When they 'accidentally' shoot a guy nine times in the back of the head, video seems to be missing.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

easily solvable problem: losing the footage is indication of guilt. you shoot someone, you better have it ready. it malfunctioned, better have a partner who has theirs ready. if no one has footage to clear you, it's used as evidence of guilt.

of course pussy ass lawmakers will never do that.

[-] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 3 weeks ago

I believe having lack of evidence being the evidence for a crime is problematic, but it sure is evidence enough that they aren't fit for their job and they should immediately lose it. Everyone Including the supervisor who failed to run the team properly.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

first of all it's not lack of evidence, it is evidence itself. if the camera is not working that's tampering with evidence and is a good indication of guilt.

second of all if you can have laws like felony murder you can sure as shit have this. if you commit a felony (like a robbery), don't hurt anyone, and a cop murders a random person in response because they're trigger happy pigs, you can be held responsible for the murder as if you committed it yourself.

my suggestion is far more reasonable compared to that: if you kill someone you better have evidence that it wasn't foul play, because guess what, that's what everyone needs to do. we don't just allow people to kill and go free, and cops shouldn't be exempt.

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Should be at least streamed to a server not controlled by the police, including things like charge levels so they can't claim "oh whoops, it ran out of charge!". A specific organisation within the judiciary, perhaps?

This way they're gonna need to get far more creative in concealing video.

And if you're found to do something that is concealing evidence, well that's a crime by itself

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago

Upvoted and agreed, not least because I just learned that "all of the sudden," while at present a nonstandard variant of "all of a sudden," has valid history.

And of course it doesn't matter in this casual context!

But in formal writing, in this era, using "a" will avoid distracting the reader from your main point.

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

"All of the sudden" is only valid because it's so commonly (incorrectly) used. Much as it annoys me, that's just how language works.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

"of the sudden" (1570) actually predates "of a sudden" (Shakespeare) according to my OED as squinted at through the nifty magnifying glass. But it's been considered obsolete for a long time despite having all of a sudden experienced a resurgence.

(Note, I modernized the spellings of "sudden" rather than try to switch focus back and forth)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago

Lmao let's see how long it takes them to shut this down

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago
[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If only CSI enhancing worked in real life, we could out the asshole on the far left.

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

far left

From his PoV, he's actually standing on the far-right. Fitting lol

[-] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

nice.

Is there one for ice too?

[-] Sinthesis@lemmy.today 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I took a selfie and it told me I was an ice agent.... Wtf I'm such a piece of shit

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Also what about cops outside of the LAPD? This app only useful if it works on any cop.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] teft@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago
[-] StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 3 weeks ago

Putting it out there for someone to do this for cops in the UK. I can't run infrastructure but the cops terrorise out local community and constantly refuse to identify themselves/turn off their badge cam.

[-] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 18 points 3 weeks ago

This is ILLEGAL when Working Class people Do It!

-Chuck Schumer at Some Point probably!

[-] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I agree with that the abusive cops and ice is insane in the US, and it should be stopped. I also believe that the US is a corrupt nation in nearly every place of the government and surrounding instances.

But a question surround this, what if the US wasn't corrupt and the judges would actually follow the law (juries wouldn't be able to exist for most cases) and hypothetical if the US had privacy laws for everything besides businesses wouldn't this be the same punishable offence that would protect citizens?

In GDPR countries (among others) nobody is allowed to do something like this with face recognition because the law works for everybody. (Some people are trying to destroy this in some countries, though).

At the same time, if the government is allowed to use facial recognition and other anti-privacy measures to identify people where there is no ground to, then why shouldn't the people be able to do that?

Edit: I am not from the US and my look on life and trias political situations is different than what the fuck is happening in the US

load more comments (37 replies)
[-] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 weeks ago
[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 11 points 3 weeks ago

Is it me or is LA the only part of America doing anything resembling resistance?

[-] ssroxnak@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

I think it's mainly LA that is seeing a large invasion of federal forces

[-] match@pawb.social 6 points 3 weeks ago

For the moment

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

No, it’s happening everywhere. But I’ve also seen some significant resistance happening in other cities like NYC, Newark, Portland, Chicago, Seattle, SF, etc.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] dinckelman@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

What are they so afraid of? They're public servants, so they should be publicly identifiable. If they don't like it, get off the government payroll

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Gudl@feddit.org 4 points 3 weeks ago

This is nice. Use their own weapons against these fuckers.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
393 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

72933 readers
1463 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS