30
submitted 10 hours ago by vivalapivo@lemmy.today to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

I am not from the US. Had my close relative fight with cancer. If not for the government which sponsored it almost fully, excluding a couple of procedures like PET, it would cost our family a lot. Just for the scale: pial for one infusion of one out of three drugs would cost us $8k and my relative would've needed 16 infusions.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Holy crap, all these answers and hardly anything about how health insurance is supposed to work.

Basically, most people have health insurance. With the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) from years ago, it's basically required but getting care is simpler (you can't be denied a plan for a preexisting condition, for example. But it's hella expensive. It's also typically tied to your employer as part of your compensation package like retirement contributions, which means if you change employers there's a good chance you need to change insurance and even doctors.

ANYWAY, say you have procedures done. Insurance companies typically have contracted amounts for stuff with each provider (a "discount" from insane prices nobody actually pays). You typically pay the first however many dollars, depending on what you're having done and how your plan works. Eventually, you'll reach a dollar amount that's your maximum for the year, and from there insurance generally covers everything they normally would

Some people also have Medicare (ages 65+) and/or Medicaid (based on income or disability). Some people have private insurance on top of it. My daughter was born extremely early and stayed in the hospital for months. Her very low birth weight was a qualifying disability for Medicaid, and she was on my work health insurance. Claims would go through work insurance first, and any remaining costs (deductible) would be passed to Medicaid. If there was anything left, I'd be responsible for that. But I don't think that ever happened

Obviously, coverage is different for different people - different employers have different plans that cover different things differently. But in theory, that's how it should work.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago

You start a GoFundMe then die

[-] d00phy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

This is, increasingly, the answer.

[-] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 9 hours ago

They made a really good documentary about this a few years ago:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breaking_Bad

[-] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 4 points 6 hours ago

You have money or insurance (if they dont deny coverage) or you die.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 12 points 9 hours ago

are you asking how we treat, or what do we pay?

many people with cancer in the u.s. go the cheapest routes for treatment because some are incredibly expensive. hospitals are only required to 'stabilize'. they are not mandated to cure. poorer people have worse outcomes as they cant afford the best treatments.

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 4 points 9 hours ago

are you asking how we treat, or what do we pay?

Both actually.

cheapest....they are not mandated to cure

So even the stabilization requires paying the bill? Isn't it like an emergency medicine where doing nothing just kills?

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 8 hours ago

yes, there is no free healthcare.

those with the lowest incomes qualify for government assistance in the form of medicare/medicaid but this is fairly minimal and specifically excludes most novel treatments. our republicans/conservatives continually find ways to reduce this funding. they are truly awful human beings despite being the 'pro life', 'pro god' block of our electorate.

the united states sucks donkey balls for poor people considering its wealthy status otherwise. all that money is at the top, and its getting worse.

[-] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

We are responsible for paying for emergency medicine

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 points 9 hours ago

But like, after one's stabilized?

[-] hallettj@leminal.space 6 points 8 hours ago

Hospitals are required to provide emergency treatment - what we call ED or ER visits - regardless of ability to pay. Patients are expected to pay for that treatment. It's just that the hospital isn't supposed to deny treatment based on whether they think patients will or won't pay the bill. This is getting-stabilized treatment.

This is an important point in arguing for universal healthcare: if people can't afford treatment, they're more likely to go to the ED where they won't be turned away. ED visits tend to cost more than non-emergency, so that drives costs up.

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 points 8 hours ago

Found this post as well. ED is not always an option

https://lemmy.world/post/30962921

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago

In financial terms, for most people the government doesn’t help you at all[^1]. Either your private health insurance pays some of the costs, or else you pay completely out of pocket. Even if you do have health insurance, it’s still going to cost you several thousand dollars per year until it’s resolved. It’s quite common for cancer to cause people to go bankrupt even with good health insurance.

[^1]: If you’re 1) old or 2) through means testing are found to be both poor and physically unable to work, then you get government-funded a health insurance plan. You still might go bankrupt though, just as with private health insurance.

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 points 9 hours ago

And after I go bankrupt, my children go broke, could I receive the governmental treatment for remission?

[-] the_abecedarian@piefed.social 4 points 10 hours ago

Are you asking about the specific course of treatment, which will verify by type and stage, or how people pay?

As for paying, the only national programs are Medicare (restricted by age) and Medicaid (restricted by income). The US veterans administration is a separate govt program for military veterans and I believe their families, too. Everyone else either has some level of insurance provided by their employer (which will still generally be terrible), or nothing at all.

The charts here are helpful https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6778988/

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 6 points 9 hours ago

It looks like if a person is above the poverty line and is under 65 they will have to pay like 20% of the medical bill which could be insane, given they have an insurance. Otherwise most first line treatments are covered by Medicare and Medicaid Plan B.

So if a person earns, like not insane $3k/mo, they will most certainly be billed with enormous bills and be refused to be treated again in case of relapse, just because they haven't paid the previous bill?

[-] BussyCat@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

So there is also an out of pocket maximum which is the most you’ll pay in a calendar year no matter how much your expenses are which vary by insurance plans but in my experience have generally been between 5-15k with 15k being for much cheaper insurance and 5k being for better insurance so if you have 1m in medical expenses and copay would be 200k it would instead be just that max out of pocket of approximately 10k, which while not great is much more manageable. The unfortunate thing is that is tied to the year so if you start treatment in November and finish treatment in March that 10k per calendar year turns into 20k since it was over the course of 2 years

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 points 13 minutes ago

max out of pocket

That's what I've been missing all this time.

Bottom line is:

If you have income above the poverty line, say $2k/mo, don't pay the insurance fee for some reason (the income is from something shady like onlyfans or etsy), you don't have a disability, and you're younger than 65 - only then you can get million dollars bill.

Otherwise, cancer treatment could cost you up to $15-30k and sometimes even be free.

[-] the_abecedarian@piefed.social 3 points 8 hours ago

In addition, medical costs in the US are higher than many places, because the insurance companies don't have to bargain with the whole nation at once. Even Medicare and Medicaid have historically been prevented by law from using their full bargaining power in some cases.

I don't actually know what happens to medical coverage if you have medical debt. It will eventually go to collections and can be used to garnish your wages, I believe.

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 2 points 8 hours ago
[-] the_abecedarian@piefed.social 6 points 8 hours ago

If your country has a better system, it is because the unions and the left have fought for it. Don't let the Macrons of the world do to you what Reagan did to us.

[-] d00phy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

This cannot be screamed loud or often enough!

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 9 hours ago

Like most other countries, expect that a lot of people only treat what they can afford. A lot of Go Fund Me sites have been created due to expensive medical treatments.

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 0 points 9 hours ago

Ok, I get the Black mirror reference, but I wanted serious answers

[-] d00phy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, it’s easy to think people are joking about using Go Fund Me for medical treatments, but it’s real. More than that, you’ll see news stories here about people donating their money so a kid can get some treatment, or their time off so that a parent can take a kid to their treatment, and they’re treated like “feel good” stories about communities banding together rather than the dystopian hellscape that they really are. The US is capitalism run amok, and the populations of other countries really should take notice before their wealthy classes succeed in making the same political decisions that got us here. It’s already happening in the EU.

[-] playffix@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 hours ago

they are being serious, though. a lot of people in the US use fundraising platforms like GFM in order to afford medical treatments. not just cancer, but other important surgeries, medical devices, service animals, etc. even if they have health insurance. insurance companies can semi-arbitrarily decide if the issue is "severe" enough to warrant full coverage (or coverage period).

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 points 9 hours ago

TIL that go fund me is actually charity and not a onlyfans predecessor

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 9 hours ago

This was a serious answer.

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 2 points 9 hours ago

Sorry, googled it. The actual fuck

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
30 points (94.1% liked)

Asklemmy

48986 readers
612 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS