301
submitted 11 months ago by fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kraivo@lemmy.world 42 points 11 months ago

Seems like someone sending actual engines into other places where you can't legally buy it. For example, sanctioned country

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 10 points 11 months ago

Why not send the fake parts there if they are equivalent?

[-] Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social 7 points 11 months ago

Because we live in a neoliberal hell scape where companies are glad to turn a blind eye to safety regulations if it means saving a couple bucks.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 11 months ago

Yes, but wouldn’t the sanctioned countries be similar? It seems to me it was likely a scam to save many where they sold non genuine parts and pretended they were genuine, but evading sanctions doesn’t make sense.

[-] dotslashme@infosec.pub 19 points 11 months ago

Pretty sure none of these parts ended up in a private jet.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Much smaller installed base, much less money for the scammers to make.

From the article, just Delta airlines has 2,100 engines in service.

The two planes I know that have been affected by this are the A320 and the 737. Both models have had more that 11,000 built each. So at lease 22,000 planes. (44,000 engines)

By comparison the G650/G700/G800 series (EM's private jet) has a total of... 512.

[-] Yewb@kbin.social 16 points 11 months ago

Lets outsource everything im sure that will always work out!

[-] Magrath@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago

Yeah I have a hard time believing that only less than 1% of their fleet is effected. They are being dodgey as fuck about it. Also any airline would jump at the chance for cheaper parts and these counterfeit parts were probably cheaper than legit parts.

[-] Chunk@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Yay story time!

One of the 2 SpaceX falcon 9 failures, CRS-7, was caused by the manufacturer claiming a strut (metal pole) was rated to N lbs but in reality its failure point was N/2.

SpaceX sourced the material from an industrial supply company, not an aerospace company, and that company's material testing procedures were less strict. During launch the strut failed and caused a "rapid unscheduled disassembly". Or, as I like to say, an sad boom.

It's a little different than what's going on with these aircraft but it's similar. These companies really need to test the stuff they buy because your supply chain

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 1 points 11 months ago

Wow, lets add to the list of reasons I will never get on an airplane.

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
301 points (98.1% liked)

News

22916 readers
3619 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS