139
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Salamence@lemmy.zip 24 points 3 weeks ago

The democrat leadership did everything in their power to stop bernie in 2020 they will do the same against AOC

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed, no reason to give them reprieve. Let them try again and this time the gerontocracy is weaker then it has ever been.

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 5 points 3 weeks ago

It's "Democratic" when used as an adjective.

Don't use Rush Limbaugh-speak. (May he rot in hell.)

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 weeks ago

you guys need ranked choice. I'd bet on most red voters not ranking multiple and just putting their evil fucker pick as #1. then you need more than one non evil candidate.

[-] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 8 points 3 weeks ago

We tried. I watched rank choice requests fail time and time again, because people vote against it thanks to smear campaigns.

My buddy is in a city with rank choice, and after the most recent election, there was a push to get rid of it again. You can tell by who.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago

yeah my bad you need guillotines first

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 6 points 3 weeks ago

Instead what we have are Republicans trying to outlaw ranked choice voting... They've already had right wing media brainwashing the people into believing it's a really bad thing...

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Republicans are trying to outlaw voting. Unless it is for their candidate.

[-] shirro@aussie.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago

Ranked choice is bare minimum for a democracy these days. Whatever ancient shit the US has doesn't count anymore. Also get rid of the elected tyrant bullshit and upgrade to parliamentary democracy. Then go for mixed-member proportional for extra credit. Also get rid of voting machines and do it all on paper.

[-] spacesatan@leminal.space 3 points 3 weeks ago

Ranked choice only goes so far when the electorate is batshit insane and willfully ignorant.

[-] intheformbelow@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

God, americans are so naive. There won't be fair elections anymore. You had your chance and you blew it! It's over for your democracy.

[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago

It's the Democrats. They still haven't realized that the game is over. Nobody's playing by the rules. Why would they start during an election?

[-] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

The democrats have handed Trump the country on a plate. As a non American I've been saying the American "Empire" will fall eventually, I never thought it would be to a fascist, and with a wimper.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] FrankFrankson@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

It is looking more and more like the election was stolen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 13 points 3 weeks ago

She should absolutely run. I don't know if she should win the nomination, but running brings a voice to the wing of the party she represents.

Primaries are about coalition building. And to have your ideas represented by the eventual candidate you need a champion to promote them in the process.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know if she should win the nomination,

Her winning the nomination would be Schumer and Pelosi's worst nightmare. They would 100 percent rather lose to Trump than let that happen.

[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe we'll luck out and those two will be dead by then.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago

People in america still believe there is going to be an actual election in 2028?

[-] Mamdani_Da_Savior@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I have my doubts

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

All the fucking second-order sexists here saying we can't elect a woman because two of the worst female candidates ever lost.

These are the same people who said Obama couldn't win because he was black. Not that they were racist, no they love black people, but they just want to make absolutely extra sure we don't actually try to elect one. Because they imagine their neighbor/uncle/coworker would look at everything going on and think "none of that is important, no black presidents". They're not racist, they just advocate for racism. And with this most facile of analyses they'll believe themselves to be politically savvy realists rather than reactionary children.

This is the cowardice that dooms liberalism. At every opportunity they want to worry about what their opponents will like and time after time will try to blame strategy or immutable characteristics for the failures of their do-nothing policies. Politics is about change. When people's lives suck you don't try to tell them we'll keep doing the same things. And whether the person talking change is a charismatic black man or a clown show, or even... A FEEEMALE, they'll vote for them.

[-] myrrh@ttrpg.network 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

...when i was growing up, my well-meaning parents pulled me aside to express their concern over a jewish friend dating a black friend; aghast at their comment, i immediately confronted them over its apparent racism, and they replied that they had nothing against it personally, but were instead concerned about what other people might think...

...they're f*cking balls-out fascists fourty years later, and i want no part of them in my life...

...to anyone tempted to compromise their own best interests on behalf of what other people might think: don't give them that kind of power over you, or they'll drag you down in it...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] altphoto@lemmy.today 10 points 3 weeks ago

Simple. I'm voting AOC if her name is on the ballot. Take my vote AOC!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

During a debate, AOC would smash any Government of Putin candidate. The problem lies with the Democratic Party.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

Kamala showed trump for the idiot he is. Didn't make much of a difference. I think AOC would do much better, but I don't hold out much expectations for debates to influence things. Hell, the current criminal in the white house didn't participate in the Republican primary debates and still, somehow, got a bunch of inbred hillbillies to vote for him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Save us aoc your our only hope

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

As a non-American, electing AOC as president would be the way to speed run the repair of America's reputation internationally.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Jolly_Platypus@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I love AOC, but she will lose.

The American people have shown that they would rather have a convicted felon, rapist, fascist pedophile than a highly qualified woman.

It's stupid, but it's reality.

A woman candidate is a non starter.

[-] teolan@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Unlike Kamala and Clinton she actually believes in something, and not just the Dems' very rich corporate donors.

look at Zohran Mamdani in New York. He's a Muslim, foreign born, socialist. Plenty of things that by the same logic would make him loose. But he won the primary and odds are he'll Winn the mayor position.

[-] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 weeks ago

NYC does not extrapolate out to the US, or things would look very different these days.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

The issue is we've never actually tried to run a populist left candidate. So everyone saying, "it'll never work!" have no real bases for that statement. (the closest we've ever been was Sanders, and the DNC ensured that he was not going to be on the ballot.)

A TRUE LEFT POPULIST WILL WIN! in my opinion

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago

We actually did, his name was Franklin D. Roosevelt.

Sure if we hold him up to today's standards not a progressive by any means, but he campaigned on working class issues and helped steer the country out of the depression. He created virtually all our modern safety nets or their predecessors.

He was so popular a president that Congress amended the constitution to ensure no other president could have more than 2 terms. He was so popular congress was afraid it threatened the power of their branch of government.

Running on and actually accomplishing worker centric policy works.

And to fend of the inevitable yes he was not that progressive by today's measures and had a mountain of flaws. But his accomplishments were revolutionary for the country in his time.

[-] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I didnt say 'it'll never work!!', I said NYC <> the US. You can't compare the two and say "See, it works" when he isn't even elected yet, and its in a city that is absolutely further left than democrats on the national scale.

I would love to see it work. One mayoral hopeful in a friendly city is not a reasonable comparison though.

Edit: feel free to show me a single example somewhere red. I'd love it.

When that happens, yeah, that'd be a good example.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] the_q@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

This is the type of thinking that will keep the status quo the status quo.

"Things can't change oh well!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

To be fair, Clinton and Harris and the platform were not particularly exciting, and they played by the old rules.

Misogyny may have been a contributing factor, but not being bold, exciting, or authentic sure as hell didn’t help.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[-] Kcap@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Right now, the ticket I think has the best chance of winning is Buttigieg/AOC. I think the DNC knows they need to go younger and have someone who can stand up to a bully in an eloquent and calm manner that will win over reasonable people. And I think AOC probably knows that the only way the DNC is letting a democratic socialist on the ticket is if they fall in line a bit and not come off as a firebrand who has to fix everything with drastic change and would be willing to go incrementally in the left direction. The DNC would be wise to energize the Bernie youth vote they abandoned last election cycle, but they definitely won't give her the keys or their blessing alone which blows. This ticket gives you appeal to the youth, to the rational elder folks like even my 70 year old lifetime republican father who hates trump, the gay community, city folk, country folk, and of course veterans too. Pretty solid combo if you ask me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

She has no path forward clearing primary to fight for presidency.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Gork@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago

My right-wing friend finds AOC hot so he might actually vote for her if she runs.

[-] smeenz@lemmy.nz 3 points 3 weeks ago

Right wingers love the idea of hate-sex

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
139 points (96.6% liked)

politics

24872 readers
944 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS