225

Kristi Noem waited 3 days to deploy FEMA rescuers after Texas flood hit: report (www.rawstory.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/politics@lemmy.world

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Heikki2@lemmy.world 63 points 3 weeks ago

I'm sure there is a completely normal reason, like she wanted to make sure all the dogs were dead, too.

[-] ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago

Gather round, my pilgrims. The mighty LORD came to her in a vision, and informed her that God sent the hurricane to destroy the wicked, like Sodom and Gomorrah. And so, the LORD ordered her to withhold rescue until God's Punishment has fully swept through the land, purging evildoers wherever they hide from the LORD's holy light. Only the faithful will be spared by the LORD. Hallelujah!

Oh uh, and I'm joking with this comment. Sometimes my roleplay is too good for some folks.

[-] b3an@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

It probably not far from her twisted little peabrain.

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago

She had to make sure that Texas deployed all their thoughts and prayers first.

[-] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago

Note: if she cannot shoot the dogs, she will attempt to starve them.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 52 points 3 weeks ago

And that's a state they like. Any state that went blue is on their own.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

California resident here, we're just going to succeed at this point if the GOP keeps power.

Thanks for all the... paper towels.

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago

*secede

But I hope you're successful.

[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 3 weeks ago

Well, FEMA funds are being redirected towards building concentration camps in the Everglades. Whatcha gon do without any money?

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's okay, it's not like red states ever have any emergencies.

[-] rouxdoo@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

She waited 72 hours. The last living rescue was less than 24 hours after the flood.

We don't pay government to provide services, we pay government to support political functionaries and their appointed staff in their role as thieves of our taxes.

Small government for (R)'s is no spending on services. Small government for (D)'s is no limits on spending for things we all agree we need (with all of the overhead of the R's).

I guess I would rather have the one where I get some basic level of service from my government but I can't claim to like it.

[-] Botzo@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Next time just tell Noem that the rain didn't have a visa to enter the country.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

And was a slightly disobedient puppy.

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

How dare you suggest that she uses tax money to save your lives? Disgusting, that money could be better used for fascism.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

Well, yeah. FEMA, bad...remember?

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Aren't they the ones that kidnap people and put them into concentration camps?

Ah, wait I'm being told that it's handled by another agency nowadays.

[-] fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Climate change? Build a wall so the floods won’t come through, right, Kristi Gnome?

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

No, she forces the rain into the Everglades camp so they have some showers....

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

And the ocean is gonna pay for it!

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

How DARE democrats be hypocritical about the blame

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 weeks ago

Why the hell would this admin do anything that helps people? I'm not being sarcastic.

[-] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 6 points 3 weeks ago

Would it be possible for FEMA to have just gone on their own accord on the ground that any reasonable Secretary of Homeland Security would have asked them to go?

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Imagine the truth social bullshit about Gavin “newscum” if this happened in CA.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago

This reminds of the response of the Bush administration after Hurricane Katrina. Bush had appointed a big campaign donor whose primary experience was in running and judging show horses to manage FEMA, and he was in way over his head with Katrina.

They knew Katrina was coming, it took nearly a week to move across the Gulf of MEXICO after crossing Miami, and doing a lot of damage there. Then it creeped across the Gulf, growing larger until filled the entire Gulf.

This was obvious to EVERYONE who was watching any television, but the Bush administration did nearly nothing to prepare. They didn't use dozens of school buses to evacuate people, they just let them sit in the yard and get destroyed by floodwater. They made no attempt to stage supplies, make arrangements for food and shelter, evacuate hospitals, etc. They literally did NOTHING.

Katrina hit New Orleans on a Monday, and by that evening it was clear that it was a major disaster. People escaped to the SuperDome for shelter, where rumors spread of violent gangs roaming the Dome raping and pillaging. News videos showed dead bodies in the streets, desperate people just walking past them. If people saw a news camera, they would literally beg for help, for water, for food, for safety.

By Wednesday, the Bush administration had still done nothing. They had lots of excuses, but New Orleans is only a long day's drive from DC, and yet yet somehow they couldn't get rescuers, food, supplies, etc. to them, even though the news media had no problem getting there and sending out video.

On Wednesday, I was watching one of the news people interview "Brownie," the head of FEMA, as he actually said: "We weren't aware of the situation in the SuperDome until today," which was two days after the storm hit. Literally EVERYBODY in the country was watching it on LIVE TV, 24 hours a day, but somehow the head of FEMA wasn't aware of it until 2 DAYS LATER?

This sounds like the same lack of preparation, but also mostly a lack of caring. These are self-appointed Aristocrats, and they think they are above worrying about the nonsense going on in the daily lives of the rubes. They literally don't care at all about any of those dead people.

[+] jordanlund@lemmy.world -13 points 3 weeks ago

Isn't that standard procedure though? Not much disaster workers can do until actually stops raining, right?

Katrina hit August 29th, 2005. Bush signed the relief package 9/2, 4 days later. And that was just approving the money to be spent, not actually spending it.

I mean, if the area is actively being destroyed, how do you even get people in to help?

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

No, it is not normal at all. You are talking about a relief package to help people rebuild. Those come later. This article is talking about search and rescue teams. Those teams go in as soon as possible to help find and rescue people.

"In the past, FEMA would have swiftly staged these [search and rescue] teams, which are specifically trained for situations including catastrophic floods, closer to a disaster zone in anticipation of urgent requests, multiple agency sources told CNN," reported Gabe Cohen and Michael Williams. However, "even as Texas rescue crews raced to save lives, FEMA officials realized they needed Noem’s approval before sending those additional assets."

That approval came on Monday. Apparently she doesn't work weekends.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Usually, you have a National weather service that estimates rainfall for an area and warns you about possible disasters so you can issue warnings and pre-stage response teams... Wonder what happened to all that.

[-] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 9 points 3 weeks ago

According to the NY Times:

the Weather Service employee whose job it was to make sure those warnings got traction — Paul Yura, the long-serving meteorologist in charge of “warning coordination” — had recently taken an unplanned early retirement amid cuts pushed by the so-called Department of Government Efficiency. He was not replaced.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/09/opinion/texas-floods-nws.html

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago

No. For an emergency response like this the first 72 hours are critical, that's the entire window where you have a chance of live rescue.

[-] Ava@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 weeks ago

Well... as the article pretty explicitly mentions, they would normally have staged resources at a nearer location so that their response could be more rapid, but Noem's new rules hampered them by being overly burdensome. And Texan crews were already operating.

[-] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Isn't that standard procedure though?

No. After the first 24 hours, the chances of live rescues plummet. After 72 hours, the chances are basically 0. SOP is to deploy ASAP to rescue as many people as possible.

Katrina hit August 29th, 2005. Bush signed the relief package 9/2, 4 days later. And that was just approving the money to be spent, not actually spending it.

You say this as if it’s supposed to be a good thing. I’m going to assume you’re either too young to remember it happening, or old enough that you were already in the conservative bubble. Katrina was one of the largest fuckups in Bush’s political career. He waited four days to deploy because he thought the death and damage reports were being exaggerated. He saw the official reports on his desk, and basically went “fake news! It can’t be that bad, can it?” His aides had to compile live aerial news footage for him to even begin to comprehend the level of damage that Katrina had caused. And they only had easy access to aerial footage because the 20’ deep floods prevented ground footage. Bush’s delayed response to Katrina is widely cited as one of the single worst emergency responses in American history. Basically second only to Trump digging his heels in and denying the pandemic.

I mean, if the area is actively being destroyed, how do you even get people in to help?

Logistics takes time, and that’s why rapid response is crucial. If it takes 8 hours to get boots on the ground, and rescue ops are most successful within the first 24, you can do the math on how rapidly the deployment would need to begin.

[-] Blemish5236@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

George Bush hates Black people.

[-] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The reference, cuz it makes me laugh every single time.

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

No. Katrina was a colossal fuck-up for Bush. His aides had to make a DVD of the news coverage to get him to realize the severity of the situation and that he needed to deploy significant resources. It was a huge embarrassment for the administration.

And then several Republicans in Congress were questioning whether the city should be rebuilt at all. People had to sit them down and explain that it’s important to have a port that basically every navigable river east of the Rocky Mountains is a tributary and the Port of New Orleans is critical national infrastructure. A lot of agricultural exports go through it. It was so stupid.

There were mistakes by the mayor and governor but a lot of the federal government was just oblivious (aside from the Coast Guard, who saved hundreds, if not thousands of stranded people.) And that’s just New Orleans. Katrina was massively wide and Mississippi and Alabama were having issues too.

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

And then several Republicans in Congress were questioning whether the city should be rebuilt at all

Obviously not, it's a black people city. Let them live in cakes or something

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025

225 points (99.6% liked)

politics

25060 readers

800 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News