28
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] yessikg@fedia.io 4 points 8 hours ago

They're not for me, that's for sure

[-] illusionist@lemmy.zip 17 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

[immutable] ... and the name is there so we’re stuck with it.

Not really. We move(d) to atomic.

[-] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 10 points 14 hours ago

I've only heard it as atomic tbh

[-] cyborganism@piefed.ca 0 points 10 hours ago

That's a really good article and they highlight exactly what my problem is with these kind of distribution.

"Use Linux so you can have total control of your system!"

* takes away the ability to have total control over my system.

Like wtf.

And how do you explain to your aging parents why their applications aren't available because it's not containerized?

I dunno. It's got its applications, like on systems where the specs are all the same, like the Macs or Steam deck or tablets. But to me that doesn't make sense on a PC.

If you want to leave your system folders alone, just don't SUDO.

[-] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 9 hours ago

Damn near every application I install through the terminal requires sudo.

The only time I haven't had to invoke sudo was using the graphical flatpack installer included in Linux Mint.

Many of the people who I have had to support through my IT work would 1000% brick their system by following copy+paste commands using sudo instead of just installing a flatpack.

The choice isn't supposed to be for us hobbyists. It's meant for a "I would like to make my system protected from my ignorance, please".

[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 8 points 8 hours ago

The people using Linux to have total control over their system isnt the people using atomic distros.

Also you dont need to say theyre not available because they aren't containerised you simply tell them its not available because they dont support linux or since your aging parents have low software requirements 100% of their apps are on flatpak.

[-] cyborganism@piefed.ca 4 points 5 hours ago

Good point.

[-] muhyb@programming.dev 6 points 8 hours ago

It's great for people who don't want to take control of the system part but take control of their data. I installed one on my aunt's PC and she's quite happy with it.

I used to had to login via Teamviewer when something goes wrong, or even worse, describe her to login into tty and give commands to fix the situation. She's been using Linux for almost 9 years now and I did that at least 3 times over the phone. Twice it was Ubuntu that got borked after an update and once it was LMDE.

Last time, I installed Aurora and so far it's been fine. It hasn't been long so I cannot compare and say it's better so ask me 2 years later if you remember. :) (do we have a !remindme bot here?)

However I have a feeling that I won't have to deal with such things anymore.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
28 points (93.8% liked)

Linux

8376 readers
307 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS