159
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cabbage@piefed.social 53 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

American government: Builds concentration camps

Mexican government: Develops brand new chocolate bars

I'm happy to see there are still some governments out there who rule in the interest of the people.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 17 points 1 week ago

A high quality chocolate bar, at that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 27 points 1 week ago

Not objecting, but what is the motivation of the Mexican government to do this? Have they done similar things before?

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't think they've done something exactly like this, but they have aggressively tackled obesity in recent years, going as far as labeling all foods with excess fats, salt, and sugar. It's very visible on the package and it does influence what I buy.

But this is the way I found out we're doing this now. 😅

[-] boaratio@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But also I think because all the existing cocoa producers are evil enslavers. This will help something like 1800 Mexican farmers.

[-] stinky@redlemmy.com 7 points 1 week ago

Nestle is notoriously evil - I'm hoping Mexico can compete

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago

they have aggressively tackled obesity in recent years

Actually doing something? Good on them!

[-] sunflowercowboy@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago

Government should probably provide the cheapest food and set the standard.

However ideology like this leads to issues in reality.

If a competitor gets lower prices would hint at some questionability. Government correction becomes suppression. Suppression leads to . . .?

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago

Uhh what?

It’s called competition. Having a competitor in the market who’s goal is to keep people fed instead of making money hand over fist would both bring prices down and bring quality up on higher priced items.

If we have to do capitalism, let’s get some not-for-profit competition happening.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Less profits for shareholders? And that is unacceptable!

/s

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

However ideology like this leads to issues in reality.

Issues for who? The consumer? Or the capitalists?

If a competitor gets lower prices would hint at some questionability.

It would hint that it's a shitty product, presuming no foul play by the government and the product is not overpriced (doesn't appear to be).

Government correction becomes suppression. Suppression leads to . . .?

Government correction how? From suppression I think you mean lowering their price? The scenario you're laying out doesn't make sense.

The point of this kind of product is to be the baseline, no capitalist should be able to afford to offer the same product for less, because the government already has the lowest possible margin.

You start by making a better product, and you can charge whatever people decide the improved product is worth. It's a good thing that an asshole capitalist can't market a $7 bar of chocolate when a very good quality one is $1. At that price difference, your chocolate better be amazing.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] yarr@feddit.nl 14 points 1 week ago

Not to be outdone, Trump had the following announcement from the White House:

"Today, the USA introduced its new chocolate bar, priced at over $10. Made of 0% cocoa, hydrogenated corn syrup, and trans fats. No natural ingredients, no milk, no vanilla. It's bigly on flavor and very, very, tasty. We are taking pre-orders now at USAChocolate.gov."

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Are you sure they would use TRANS fats?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Hershey chocolate bar is rejected as chocolate because it doesn't have enough cocoa and is contaminated with lead.

Hershey's milk chocolate contains around 11% cocoa solids, meaning it doesn't meet the European standard according to some sources. Therefore, in some European countries, Hershey's is labeled as "chocolate-flavored" or "chocolate-flavored candy bar" rather than simply "chocolate". 

https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/consumer-reports-finds-more-lead-cadmium-chocolate-urges-change-hershey-2023-10-25/

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

The cadmium is actually part of a new marketing push: "Try Hershey's, they're Cadmiummy"

[-] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 3 points 1 week ago

That actually made me want it a little, thank you

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Makes me think of "American Cheese Product," "cheese" that is closer to plastic but tastes and feels like cheese.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] altphoto@lemmy.today 13 points 1 week ago
[-] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 1 week ago

American slop producers in shambles

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

If you haven't had chocolate with vanilla in it, consider trying it. It's my favorite chocolate additive. You need to purge ideas about vanilla being sweet or creamy. It's a tobaccoy rich flavor that adds some depth even to dark chocolate.

[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

As a kid we'd make our own milkshakes at home and the best ones we came up with were vanilla ice cream with chocolate syrup.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Since I discovered dark chocolate ice cream, I've been dying for someone to make a dark chocolate and vanilla twist soft serve.

[-] Damaskox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I'd love to have a taste.

Too bad I live in Northern Europe...probably not worth buying via the Internet even if it was possible...

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

The lady doing the presentation said that it has 35% of cane sugar.

Also behind her you see "hecho con azúcar de caña" which means "made with cane sugar".

Cane sugar is generally at least a bit refined merely to purify it (so unlike High-Frutose Corn Syrup it's not made by chemically transforming something else).

That said, it's unclear if they use unrefined sugar cane, though that stuff is a complete total pita to work with hence I doubt it's not in the least bit refined.

Mind you I looked around and the info on this is all over the place: like for example saying "no added sugars" but then a bit further it turns out it has "cane sugar", which does mean that sugars were added (as the cocoa plant doesn't produce cane sugar, that would be the sugarcane plant).

Mind you, by all indications this beats almost all North American chocolates, but that hardly a tall barrier to overcome. It's pretty common to find similar stuff in European supermarkets.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Not the news I was expecting but kind of a cool way to address a variety of issues, like obesity, imports from US, generating revenue, subsidizing a national crop, etc.

[-] AskThinkingTim@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

What is the objective behind selling the chocolate bars? I will have to delve deeper into the topic.

[-] sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

I would presume it's because they're low in sugar. Due to exploding diabetes rates, Mexico has been making a concerted effort in the last few years to stem the consumption of sugary foods, drinks and snacks, particularly amongst kids. You can't have a cartoon mascot on a box of cereal, for example. They put big stickers over Tony the Tiger before changing the packaging completely. And the cost of snack foods has skyrocketed, making it largely unaffordable for lots of Mexican families. A bag of chips there costs more than it does in North America.

My guess is that this is part of that effort.

[-] v_krishna@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Mexico is in North America

[-] AskThinkingTim@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Makes sense. I recall watching a documentary showcasing how children were drinking from 2L soft drink bottles.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
159 points (98.8% liked)

Mildly Interesting

21847 readers
78 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS