Summary:
In Nepal, pressure groups like doctors, teachers, police, and transport operators are increasingly influencing the lawmaking process, often bending laws to serve their interests. A recent example involves the Nepal Medical Association protesting against penalties imposed by the Consumer Court on doctors and hospitals for negligence. Their agitation forced the government to agree to amend the Consumer Protection Act in their favor.

This is not an isolated case. Similar pressure from doctors led to amendments in the criminal code in 2018. Public transport operators recently pressured authorities to halt a ride-hailing policy despite court approval. Police unions have stalled the Nepal Police Act amendment to protect their interests, and the Teachers’ Federation has influenced the delay of the School Education Bill.

Experts highlight this trend as an intrusion on parliamentary authority. Senior advocate Radheshyam Adhikari says that the political leadership lacks the moral strength to resist these pressures, weakening legislative sovereignty. Former law professor Ganesh Datta Bhatta points out that while lobbying is natural, laws should not be constantly revised under pressure. He also notes poor consultation during lawmaking leaves stakeholders feeling excluded, prompting them to exert pressure afterward.

Overall, the article warns that such interference undermines democracy, weakens parliament's role, and leads to laws that are poorly implemented or manipulated by interest groups.

Archive: https://archive.md/8xjX9