Too vague to agree on this.
All conflicts are more complicated than this, even where there's a clearcut culprit.
I've seen it misused too many times.

Just by seeing iii's comments one can see the confusion. Where he thought the one holding the missile is what the author thinks is clearly the one chilling and vibing, I thought of another conflict entirely that this doesn't apply to, but seen the argument used at least three times.

I hereby end my post stating that the US, Canada, Australia, Aotearoa and France's New Caledonia should give back its land to its indigenous people. Thank you.

It's that easy if you pretend the first figure is the start of the story!