50
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by overload@sopuli.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

As in, doesn't matter at all to you.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] daggermoon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm of the opinion that so long as it is understandable it does not matter. English was once written as it sounded and there was no spelling consistancy. Those who were literate had little issue with it.

Some related reading: https://ctcamp.franklinresearch.uga.edu/resources/reading-middle-english https://cb45.hsites.harvard.edu/middle-english-basic-pronunciation-and-grammar

Edit: Okay my rant is more related to spelling than grammar but still interesting.

[-] DivineDev@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago

In German there's the saying "macht Sinn", which is wrong since it's just a direct translation of "makes sense". Correct would be "ergibt Sinn", in English "results in sense", but I don't care, "macht Sinn" rolls off the tongue easier.

[-] AZX3RIC@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Macht sinn to me.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

abbreviations. it doesn't save any meaningful time. it only prompts questions for clarification because people don't define the abbreviation prior to using it throughout their post. plus since everything is being abbreviated out of laziness, the same abbreviations get used for multiple things which just adds additional confusions.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] VoxAliorum@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It's not a grammar mistake per se, but I feel like sharing it and it is close enough so here we go.

As a non-native English speaker: How can you have mop~~b~~ and vacuum the floor but not broom the room?! I know it doesn't exist, but I don't care. If we have to phrase it as a grammar mistake: I use verbalisations where they are uncommon.

[-] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

I agree. I'm going to start brooming the room. Thank you for this insight.

[-] Thavron@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago
[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Not if you bring your thugs

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Skua@kbin.earth 14 points 1 week ago

I do not like the way that unspaced em dashes look. More generally I don't think that having distinct em and en dashes is actually useful anyway, you can absolutely just use an en dash in either case with absolutely no loss of clarity or readability, but I do need to use em dashes for some work writing so I have a key on my keyboard for it and use it semi-regularly. Whenever I use an em dash outside of a professional context I space it. So, "he's coming next Monday — the 6th, that is — some time in the morning," as opposed to the more broadly-recommended, "he's coming next Monday—the 6th, that is—some time in the morning."

I have absolutely no reason for this other than subjective aesthetic preferences, but it has coincidentally become somewhat useful recently. LLMs notoriously use em dashes far more than humans but consistently use them unspaced, so it's a sort of mild defence against anything I write looking LLM-generated

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SentientFishbowl@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

Anything that is used colloquially but technically isn't correct because some loser didn't like it 200 years ago. To boldly keep on splitting infinitives is a rejection of language prescriptivism!

[-] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I dont care about capitalizations, apostrophes, or if you shorthand words like tho as long as i can understand what youre saying from the context

[-] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Do u rembr txt spk? It ws vry anyng 2 read n 2 rite.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago
[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Sometimes a sentence ending with a proposition just sounds better.

[-] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

That is not sharing grammar rules. Is just something we were all incorrectly taught.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EtnaAtsume@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Being excessively prescriptive or nitpicky about the prohibition on ending sentences on a preposition is the sort of nonsense up with which I will not put.

[-] Nemo@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago

I'm really sick of people treating AAVE and other dialects like grammar mistakes, is what. Grammar Nazis indeed, protecting the purity of the English language.

[-] TachyonTele@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

Im over spellcheck on phones. I'll look the other way when something is typed all wacky from a phone.

load more comments (5 replies)

Singular they. I've had this opinion since long before I even knew about non-binary people. Using "he or she" to refer to a person without specifying gender is clunky as hell.

[-] fishsayhelo@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

but singular they isn't incorrect in the least. anyone claiming otherwise has some agenda to push in spite of the facts of it's use for a good long while

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

'irregardless' and improper 'begs the question' are both fine.

[-] the_abecedarian@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago

I hate these, but acknowledge that the battle is lost

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] communism@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Can you explain what improper "begs the question" looks like...?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Anyone prescriptivist about "begging the question" cannot be taken seriously about anything.

The canonical meaning is a sloppy mistranslation, and what everyone sensible intends and infers is a plain reading of those words in that order.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

I hit up that Wikipedia article every few years and I still don’t quite understand it. I also put nearly no effort into trying to understand it because I don’t think I’ve ever heard anything but the technically incorrect way.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] apotheotic@beehaw.org 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What incorrect grammar are you completely in defence of?

Ending a sentence on a preposition :3c

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Ending a sentence with a proposition is just fine. Picky people whom I've only seen parodies of on the Internet go "oh you ended your sentence with a preposition I have no idea what you mean by 'He went in' maybe you could explain what he went into? A jello mold? A ditch? What did go into?"

You asked if he went into the store and I said he went in, you know what I meant because of CONTEXT CLUES.

I've never met anyone who's ever been this picky but I'm ready to bite them if I ever find one.

[-] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 10 points 1 week ago

It’s not grammatically incorrect to end a sentence with a preposition. It’s a common misconception that it is a rule, basically because one guy argued in favor of it back in the 1600s and had some support for formal writing in the 1700s. But it’s never been a broad rule, and even in formal contexts it’s not a rule in any current, reputable style or usage guides (so far as I know, at least).

Some more info on the topic: https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/prepositions-ending-a-sentence-with

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

If punctuation isn't on your keyboard then it can't be that important. All dashes are the same.

I don't even appreciate that Markdown turns double-dash into one long dash. The distinction in print is a twee relic of uptight style guides, and the minute gradations do not exist in handwritten text. If you intend it as a pause-please, put spaces around it, or it looks dumb. Like that.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
50 points (89.1% liked)

Asklemmy

49643 readers
507 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS