194

The House Republican majority is stuck, one week after the ouster of Speaker Kevin McCarthy, with lawmakers unable to coalesce around a new leader in a stalemate that threatens to keep Congress partly shuttered indefinitely.

On Tuesday evening, two leading contenders for the gavel, Majority Leader Steve Scalise and Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, were addressing colleagues behind closed doors at a candidate forum. But they appeared to be splitting the vote.

McCarthy, meanwhile, was openly ready to reclaim the gavel he just lost, but was seen by many as a longshot option unlikely to win back the handful of hardliners who just ousted him.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CapgrasDelusion@kbin.social 62 points 1 year ago

If the world didn't require actual leadership this would be funny. Except it does and these morons are in a position of influence. You have 8 people who value being on TV over lives, and over 200 people who will work with you if you don't tether everything to women's uteri.

[-] jennwiththesea@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Just last week I was actually looking forward to the dramatics to begin. As long as they figured their shit out before the debt ceiling came crashing down again, it would be fine. Definitely don't feel that way now!

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The debt ceiling was earlier this year.

Last week was the budget

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Democrats and 4 republicans who actually care should put up a speaker to call a vote for a comprehensive aid package to Ukraine and Israel that funds to January 2025, then have that speaker step down.

Don’t let our allies suffer because of our dysfunction. It puts us in the exact same situation that we are in now without fucking over the rest of the world at a critical moment.

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

4 republicans who actually care

That right there is the problem

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Lolbruh. The republicans are carrying Putin’s water. This suits them just fine.

[-] Reptorian@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

4 republicans who actually care

This doesn't exist. Oh well, voters' faults. All they had to do was pick D if they want a functioning government. One job.

[-] ShadowRam@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

This should probably trigger an election when a speaker can't be decided upon. Similar to other countries that fail to form a government

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

But muh freedumb

[-] Tigbitties@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

Biden will win the 2nd term before it happens.

[-] ApostleO@startrek.website 18 points 1 year ago

I feel like if the House has no Speaker for over a year, shit would fall apart more than even Republicans could stand. We'll get within a week or two of the next shutdown deadline, and they'll finally put someone up there.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 14 points 1 year ago

Yep, shooting themselves in the foot as there will be no time to negotiate properly. So they will either accept and move on, or cause another shutdown.

[-] Tigbitties@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

That's a good call.

[-] Tigbitties@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

What's the over/under today?

[-] snownyte@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Name me a more traitorous political party in modern times. Our founding fathers would be making daily executions.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

We should tar and feather the cunts.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 15 points 1 year ago

Asked about the odds that House Republicans would successfully vote on their next speaker on Wednesday, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) replied with a cheeky smile: ‘I’d put it at 2 percent.'”

"Wen Rep. Jason Smith (R-MO) heard Massie suggested a 2 percent likelihood, he jokingly replied: ‘That’s kind of high.'”

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2023/10/10/congress/latest-gop-meeting-00120864

[-] SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net 15 points 1 year ago

Of all the fucking times for this to happen

[-] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Almost seems intentional, eh?

[-] SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net 9 points 1 year ago

While yes, I'm normally inclined to believe Republicans colluding with foreign governments. I think this time, it's all just extremely unfortunate timing. McCarthy being outside really does seem to be hard-line Republicans being fed up with him, with the budget proposal being the final straw. Also McCarthy was heavily disliked by both sides.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Almost

That's a strange and unique way to spell "Definitely".

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I could be actually worse. If the 45 day budget extension hadn't occurred we could have a shut down government AND no House leadership to do anything about it while the Republicans fight amongst themselves for Speaker of the House.

[-] jerome@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Republicans are just having a good time. Wearing shirts with a giant letter A on it, walking around with a lasso and smiling while the country burns to the ground.

[-] Blackout@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

They are a party who is only united by hate for others. Once you get beyond that facade no one there knows how to function.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON (AP) — The House Republican majority is stuck, one week after the ouster of Speaker Kevin McCarthy, with lawmakers unable to coalesce around a new leader in a stalemate that threatens to keep Congress partly shuttered indefinitely.

On Tuesday evening, two leading contenders for the gavel, Majority Leader Steve Scalise and Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, were addressing colleagues behind closed doors at a candidate forum.

Just 10 months in power, the historic ouster of their House speaker — a first in the U.S. — and the prolonged infighting it has unleashed are undercutting the Republicans’ ability to govern at a time of crisis at home and abroad.

“We’re in a similar situation that we were back in January,” said Doug Heye, a former Republican leadership aide, adding the political optics of the feud look “terrible” to American voters.

McCarthy headed into the evening forum insisting he was not, at the moment, a candidate for speaker and urging his colleagues to resolve the issue internally Wednesday before bringing a nominee forward to a full House vote.

But the California Republican gave a nod to his own short track record as speaker — being ousted by the far-right flank after he led Congress to approve a stopgap spending bill to prevent a disruptive federal government shutdown.


The original article contains 994 words, the summary contains 215 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I wonder if they will figure it out before the shutdown? (November 17th?) Seems like they would have trouble funding their little darlings in Israel if they don't.

Or maybe they want that too. I don't know anymore. It's like trying to understand a toddler.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Worthless traitor parasites. A fucking waste of carbon, the whole lot of them.

[-] Techmaster@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago

I stand by what I said last week. The Democrats probably shouldn't have voted to remove, because it's going to be months. The republicans don't give a crap about the government shutting down.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If McCarthy had ever given even one iota of compromise to the democrats they might have voted not to oust him, but instead he constantly split in their faces and poked their eyes. (Just to appease the magas who ultimately ousted him anyway.)

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No. I'm sorry. You don't vote to keep a speaker who worked with you (at the last minute) to pass a bill then turned around and badmouthed you the second the bill passed.

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
194 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
1787 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS