77
submitted 7 months ago by pfc_hudson@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago

Applied retroactively and recursively, it would strip citizenship from effectively all Americans

[-] 4grams@awful.systems 29 points 7 months ago

That’s the point. They have a weapon that can be used against anyone, and it’s already shown they don’t care about due process. The courts gave him everything he needs.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think this is a great point. If they dispute the immigration status of your great grandpappy, oh looks like you're an illegal based on this purely unconstitutional "inherited status" doctrine.

Edit: The 14th amendment specifically mentions "born" in the US to prevent the use of the law to do things like this aimed at former slaves. Its no surprise that this kind of thing is being attempted by maga nazis.

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

It's going to suck to have to carry in depth genealogical records everywhere

[-] Assassassin@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I mean, you could carry the 2nd to defend the 14th

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

Right?

I'm wondering if there's a way I can use this to get deported to the lands of my great great great great grandparents (Germany or the Netherlands or somewhere idk)

They wouldn't take my stupid ass otherwise

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 5 points 7 months ago

No they’ll send you to CECOT or just make you stateless and dump you somewhere random with nothing

[-] xylol@leminal.space 3 points 7 months ago

Don't worry they're already floating the idea of slavery so illegals can work farms

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

My DNA is such a fucking mashup that I could theoretically go to almost any European country.

Take me back.

[-] DMiller@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I'm wondering about this also except my lawful parents have been here only about 30 years. I don't know if their legal status when I was born is 'legal enough' for me to remain even when birthright was perfectly intact at the time. I'd probably have three options of countries to go to. But only if they will accept 'stateless U.S. citizens' is another matter because the Global North is gungho about anti-immigration and that includes asylum.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

Nah, they'll send you to CECOT or fucking South Sudan in stead

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

My dirt farmer ancestors got here in like 1890, too late to fight against the Yahnkeez, just in time to steal land from the Indians.

So I guess I'm either Scottish or stateless now. I'm not sure which is worse. (Just kidding, Scots)

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.zip 16 points 7 months ago
[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Or Trump's wife who he bought from Epstein?

[-] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 0 points 7 months ago

Wouldn't this mean that Trump's father who's parents were German and his mother who was born in Scotland weren't citizens when he was born on American soil, hence he himself isn't?

[-] axx@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago

Of course they will never let it apply to themselves.

Fascist regimes delight in and depend on arbitrary enforcement of rules.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

No it ain't, experts have been telling us the whole time that no one is safe.

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Fucking fascists. We should still be accepting immigrants through Ellis Island (in my humble opinion)

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 7 months ago

How will this impact the people in the Epstein Files?

[-] 60d@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Donald J Trump
All Republicans
Half of Democrats

Wow. I Didn't Know That. You're Telling Me Now for the First Time

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

To that end, USCIS declared flatly that the children of immigrants who are “unlawfully present” will “no longer be U.S. citizens at birth.” They will, instead, inherit the status of their parents, rendering them detainable and deportable as infants and throughout their lives. There is no indication that the government will provide some grace period before snatching up and imprisoning this new underclass of noncitizen babies; they are apparently subject to arrest from the moment of birth.

[-] flandish@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

it’s not much of a stretch to assume they’ll do the same to people born here three generations down. or six. or twenty.

fucking pieces of garbage worthless nazis these admins and anyone who supports them are.

[-] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah that's smart, expel themselves

[-] flandish@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

if we’re lucky they’ll follow their leader.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 months ago

So, recursively and retroactively. So who is a citizen then? People who pay the $5m? People who are naturalized? Party loyalists? Does servitude guarantee citizenship? I would like to know more.

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

The more of these boxes you can check, the “safer” you are….

White.
Wealthy.
Straight.
Male.
Christian.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

And well-connected and have rightthink. Those are more important than the others. You can check all your boxes, but too much wrongthink and you'll be against the wall before you know what's happening.

[-] npdean@lemmy.today 2 points 7 months ago

Isn't birthright citizenship a human right or UN right or something?

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago

And you think trump cares?

[-] npdean@lemmy.today 0 points 7 months ago

I don’t. But it might be extremely difficult to approve.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, just like it would be really hard to do any of the constitution breaking things he has done over the years... He just does it, the supreme Court will give him a thumbs up and that's the end of it

[-] npdean@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago

What even is the point of having a court then? I don’t understand how the people are so calm and chill about all this. America is literally doing third world things and no one really cares.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

I don't know, I don't have the answers.

I'm just sitting here watching the slomo trainwreck in progress while munching popcorn. It's all there is left to do

[-] npdean@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, it is not really happening till it affects us.

[-] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

@xylol Is one of those who brought it up.

One of the steps that will lead to mass corporate slavery.

"Former" Americans will be bought and sold, or "disposed of", to pay off their "debt" for being allowed to stay on American soil.

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 0 points 7 months ago

The United States has granted birthright citizenship to virtually all children born on its soil since 1868.

No, not virtually all. Less than that. Most, yes.

[-] shane@feddit.nl 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

What do you mean? Which children born on US soil since 1868 were not granted birthright citizenship?

[-] koetje78@feddit.nl 0 points 7 months ago

Indian tribe members born in reservations.

[-] shane@feddit.nl 0 points 7 months ago

A DuckDuckGo search says that since 1924 native Americans living on reservations also get birthright citizenship. I suppose there may be a handful of native Americans born before then who are still alive, but I doubt many.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

Don't worry, the Indians born on reservations before 1924 weren't born after 1868.

The original statement didn't specify that it only applied to people alive today.

[-] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

So. This is what will cause a revolution. Believe that.

[-] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

Will anything cause a revolution?

From an outside-the-US perspective, it feels as though every incremental assault the USA’s constitution is met with a bit of tut-tutting and complaining about why elected members don’t fix things, then back to apathy 48 hours later.

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
77 points (97.5% liked)

News

36711 readers
938 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS