287
So basically the trees weren’t their fucking property and jurisdiction to trim
From their point of view the union and strike are evil because it keeps people from working and hurts the economy. They think people want to work and SAG is making actors strike. I’m no longer surprised when people justify atrocities, it’s who we are.
I mean, people generally do want to work, actors included. They just don't want to be mercilessly exploited while they're at it.
I hate the phrase "people want to work"
Only in the twisted context we act like is default is it true.
People want to have good food, socialize, play, and be comfortable. We work to make those things happen. Some people are lucky enough to make money doing something they already enjoy somewhat, but that isn't common or something that can be expected. 90% of people, at least, if given the option to do whatever they like and still have their needs met, would not choose to "work" in the way that we do now.
Absolutely
Simple question will stop the nonsense.
Did they trim the tree at the same time last year? I didn’t see that question asked or answered in the article.
FTR: This is a completely normal trim for those trees. I do question the timing as I was under the impression that trees were trimmed in either spring or fall. But I am not an arborist and the “high wind” excuse sounds at least probable.
Naw, they said it in their explanation: "this is what we always do." In this case, "this" means "using underhanded means to quash organized labor movements."
See, it all makes sense!
In seriousness, I do appreciate you providing some context. I don't know about the high winds excuse, but many trees in Southern California are trimmed whenever you want, since "spring" and "fall" don't really exist.
They aren't their trees to trim, they're the city's. Businesses can apply for permits to do it, but they didn't.
Nah the Arborist subreddit basically was unanimous in thinking the trees were essentially going to die from the severe topping that was done.
Well I do defer to the experts. But I have seen trees topped like this and it is the method used for some types of trees.
Did these arborists say what kind of tree they were?
Also if you look at the before and after shots, those trees are trimmed like that often.
Destruction of public property. Fine them to hell and back again.
You don't fuck with tree law.
Or strikes.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
287 points (98.3% liked)
politics
19135 readers
1364 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS