60
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Bidah@thelemmy.club to c/reddit@lemmy.world
(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

The boy looks like he is 12. Why is his face visible but the (what I assume is a) girl’s face is not?

[-] l_isqof@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

But don't you dare attack a nation sympathiser...

[-] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

I know we all hate Reddit, but you don't have to sink as low as this. This is a single post, hardly reddit's stance.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Religion aside, I have a solid argument for child marriage. Funny that no one who espouses the idea ever brings this up.

Being married gives one a lot more legal options and rights. Say an old man marries a young cousin so as to grease the wheels on his inheritance. Americans often marry so the other party can get health insurance. As with inheritance, the child could realize property rights they would not have access to.

Point being, people get married for reasons outside of love and sex.

Another thought, as socially conservative as we Americans are, it's a wonder no politicians run on moving state marriage and consent ages to match our nationwide age of majority (18). Maybe it turns out to be a poisonous talking point? Can't imagine anyone arguing, out loud anyway, for teen marriage. Weird.

[-] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why not adopt the child instead? It bestows far more protection on the child, including protection against sexual abuse. It has every other advantage that marriage would have.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

Another thought, as socially conservative as we Americans are, it's a wonder no politicians run on moving state marriage and consent ages to match our nationwide age of majority (18). Maybe it turns out to be a poisonous talking point? Can't imagine anyone arguing, out loud anyway, for teen marriage. Weird.

No, we do have Republican representatives who do openly argue for lowering the minimum marriage age. Like...a lot. All the fucking time, really

Here's a duck duck go search

This happens so often I can't even give you a list of names... And I have no idea why no one seems to talk about this

Also, they get caught with CP or kids a lot. Lot of venom diagram overlap... Go figure

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Didn't mean conservative politically, meant to comment on our overall sexual and social conservatism. America is, and always has been, weirdly Puritan.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Being married gives one a lot more legal options and rights.

Where? Because it's not like that anywhere I know of. At best you get some small tax breaks. Certainly no more rights or legal options other than those purely related to marriage. Like being able to get divorced.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

I think the inheritance part is true, if your spouse dies and you have joint ownership of the home and bank accounts, they're not being inherited, you already fully own them

You can do this without marriage, but you can't do this for the purposes of tax avoidance... If you give your child joint ownership out of nowhere, you'll need to explain why if the IRS starts asking questions. And there are valid answers, like if they work the family farm or business, it does make sense that they should gain ownership as their responsibility grows. Things can also be gifted for less tax obligations or put into a trust (and those rules are very wonky), but this is a simple traditional practice

But with marriage? You can claim "this is just how we do marriage, we have joint finances", and that is an accepted cultural behavior in most places. You can do it immediately, and it offers legal protection as well... For things such as medical malpractice, only the negligent party is exposed, so you cut the maximum amount that can be collected to your combined ownership/2 - primary home and other basics

Granted, I think "but this way we can cheat the system and pay less taxes" is a terrible rationale for child marriage...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

This one is about Reddits chaos No different to the unfettered Nazi bullshit. Extremely unlikely that Reddit can be accused of being too woke or Pro-Islam.

[-] veeesix@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

I prefer to follow the “half your age + 7” method in finding out the youngest age of maturity your partner should be.

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

207 for me. Makes sense, I'm told I'm an old soul.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Religion. Leave it and open your eyes to the real world. Stop believing in fairy tales.

[-] SolidShake@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I have a weird take that will give me downvotes.

In the US we grow up with 18 being an adult and consent for most things (driving is the exception and why I say "most things" )

I don't agree with marriage under 18.

In other countries though that is not the case and that is their custom. And I'm in no position to argue on some other cultures customs IN their country.

If you're in a country where underage marriage is acceptable, and you move to the US, then it is unacceptable.

[-] Brokkr@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I think people generally agree with you, but there are limits to what people will tolerate anywhere. For instance if Rwanda made a law requiring Hutus to murder of Tutsis, most people would say that's unacceptable even in Rwanda.

There's obviously a bright line between ok and not ok in that example, but for marriage it could be a little more unclear. Sure, maybe a 17 year old marrying a 19 year old is ok in some places and not others, but overall no one will probably be that upset about it. However, a majority of the world has a problem with a 50 year old marrying a 10 year old. Where exactly the line is crossed is open to debate, but pretty much everyone agrees there should be a line. Most countries are picking 18 as that line because it's better to have an imperfect choice rather than none at all.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Almost all age of consent laws and marriage laws (not finding a good map on this one) start well into puberty. Pretty funny seeing all the 18 countries right next to "no age" countries.

And the US is all over the place! I could hop any of 3 state lines and bangin' a 16-yo is fine. Meanwhile, at home, 17 would see me in a concrete and steel box. Weird. Of course our laws make Europe look positively rapey, if one believes 18 is some moral, hard limit. Guess it's no surprise our laws are more puritanical.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

I could hop any of 3 state lines and bangin' a 16-yo is fine

Funny enough, hopping the state line to do it is not so fine...but if you happen to be in the state for a different reason...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Only 10 US states peg age of consent at 18. Most are 17 a several are 16.

Check Europe's age of consent and age of marriage laws.

If teens getting married or fucking bothers anyone here, have a look at your own laws before casting stones at the US.

[-] SolidShake@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Under 18 needs parental consent.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] School_Lunch@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Its not really a culture issue though. In the US we decided on 18 because that's the age it is believed that people can make decisions for themselves. Personally I think it should probably be higher. In other countries that have a lower age of consent don't do it because they think the kids are mature enough to make that decision. They do it because they view the kids as similar to slaves who have to do what they are told. If it is a culture thing, then should culture be enforced through threat of death i.e. honor killings? They just use culture as an excuse to be shitty.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

You just slammed everyone in Europe, excepting, ironically enough, Turkey.

https://old.lemmy.world/comment/18675775

[-] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sure. I slammed anyone who thinks kids are mature enough to marry. There's plenty of states here in the US that fit the bill too.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

If you're pegging "kid" at under 18, you're against almost every law on the planet.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Bidah@thelemmy.club -2 points 1 week ago

please as a quranist don't generalize us with sunnis

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Sorry but: No god no master!

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Don’t say sorry for that.

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

scripture is blasphemy

nothing written by man could even begin to conceptualize the word of the almighty

what you call the holy word is fiction written by men and conflated to be the word of god

if there's a hell: writing, reading, quoting, and promoting scripture seems like a great way to go there

trust the relationship with god you find within you and fuck all that manipulative scripture bullshit

[-] Bidah@thelemmy.club -1 points 1 week ago

sunni muslim countries don't allow that (i live in it [ if i leave it it's punishable by death]) sunni muslims also support that

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
60 points (78.8% liked)

Reddit

21261 readers
28 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS