707
Stand out! (media.piefed.world)
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

...with nothing but their logo on it. So you can be a literal walking advertisment but you paid them to do so. For a $8 shirt that sells for $35, but is $70 with their logo on it.

Nothing says, "I'm really dumb with money" more than sportswear that has no practical use beyond general clothing.

[-] albbi@piefed.ca 59 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago
[-] albbi@piefed.ca 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I find it crazy that this comic was published in 1992. Still as relevant as back then. Maybe moreso.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

TBF it has been a thing forever before that even.. mid eighties was joredash(sp?) jeans and members only jackets when I was in middle school.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago

This isn't even a fitness brand thing. Some fashion brands have been getting crazy on this.

Case in point, Ralph Lauren Polo shirts:

The classic Polo, small logo fine:

Errr, not sure why the logo needs to be THAT big:

"DID I YOU HAPPEN TO NOTICE I WAS WEARING POLO BRAND?!?"

All of these are real shirts and not photoshop. I just screenshot these from the company website.

[-] chellomere@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

What if you want to have the shirt covered in logos and walk around like a mobile billboard? Tommy Hilfiger has several solutions for you!

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

The more I look at it, the more mesmerizing the pattern is.

Definitely not a nazi symbol if that’s what you’re getting at.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

but it's threatening to be one

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago

Definitely not a nazi symbol if that’s what you’re getting at.

Maybe a collab with Hugo Boss ?

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 14 points 2 days ago

That's egregious, wow.

[-] ideonek@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

https://youtu.be/LXIgLbC0eM4?si=pngHAjGrcSjOFzHF

Wearing t-shirts with expensive brand logos is the only way to achieve your dreams.

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Bet they don't even like horses, let alone plying hockey with them.

Nothing says, “I’m really dumb with money” more than sportswear that has no practical use beyond general clothing.

Uh, I'd like to counter with the people who get the fucking Monster logo painted on their cars. Like, you're that fucking proud of your energy drink of choice?

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I've never seen that. But I see a lot with some massive logo decal blocking the back window on what's definitely not a company car .

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

And then the person wearing it goes out with 4 of their mates who are all identical to them and wearing shirts from the same company.

[-] the_q@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago

Self image exploitation is a cornerstone of capitalism. You're never XYZ enough no matter what, better buy!

[-] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

i don’t understand what the slam here is? i love unadorned grey t-shirts!

[-] Honytawk@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago

Cause it is so mainstream, which means they are the complete opposite of rebels who dare to be different.

[-] Mesophar@pawb.social 6 points 2 days ago

It's not exactly breaking the mold...

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
707 points (99.4% liked)

People Twitter

7918 readers
2048 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS