10

I was thinking about those outfits celebrities wear that mess with flash photography equipment, and I was watching a dude on TV just now whose shirt pattern was going apeshit because of the camera, and I wondered if there could ever be a pattern or material that, when filmed, caused the camera irreversible damage. And if that were physically possible, I wondered if intentionally showing up to camera-heavy events wearing said shirt would constitute a crime on my part.

It's just a shirt after all. It's not like I'm grabbing a camera and smashing it on the ground. But at the same time, I know it will have that effect, so I'm accountable. But it's not like my shirt is emitting damaging laser beams or anything, it's entirely passive.

Also, is there anything like this scenario in real life/law?

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] phonics@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

if you invent some passive way to damage tech by just being in its vicinity. not only would it be illegal. it would be a super weapon.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

A weapon to surpass metal gear?

[-] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

Snake?!

Snaaaaaake!!!

[-] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

How they gonna find out? No cameras to witness it

[-] phonics@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago
[-] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Eyes aren’t electric…… unless your a bird

[-] phonics@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

you dont neds electric eyes to witness something. i witness stuff all the time and my eyes are analogue.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

What you describe is simply not possible with a passive material. Funnily your example of something shooting lasers is probably the only thing that could come close to actual damage

The most you can do is one of those adversarial patterns that just confuses the white balance and autofocus. There is nothing you can do to affect someone shooting in manual mode

If you could damage a camera by pointing it at something, the manufacturer would fix the issue before selling it, because no one is buying a camera that does.

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If you could damage a camera by pointing it at something, the manufacturer would fix the issue before selling it, because no one is buying a camera that does.

Recently, there were news about the LIDAR of Volvo cars destroying camera sensors when they were aimed into the direction of the IR laser beam. Yet, this is not a passive item.

[-] fishos@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Even that was debated. No one proved it continued when you took another video, just that it broke the video of the lidar itself.

[-] Skysurfer@slrpnk.net 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Here is a video demonstrating the lidar killing pixels in a phone camera sensor.

They also tried cameras on other vehicles but those were not affected, only the cellphone aimed directly at the lidar suffered damage.

[-] fishos@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So I tried watching it and never saw them close the camera app or restart the phone, so again, waiting on some actual proof with some science behind it rather than "dude totally said so". That only proves that the software controlling the picture adjustments has been sent out of whack(as evidenced by the fact that it would show true colors eventually when pointed at something else). If the pixels were "dead", they wouldn't reset. We have a separate phrase for that. It's "stuck pixel".

It's the same effect as being in a truely white lit room and everything looks orange in a camera. It's the color correction when you shine a crazy bright light at the sensor. It assumes you're on the sun and adjusts accordingly.

[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago

Might not cause damage but there is the Camera Shy Hoodie: https://www.macpierce.com/the-camera-shy-hoodie

Instructions for how to DIY provided, so it doesn't have to be a hoodie.

[-] T156@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Although that really only works as long as the camera doesn't have an IR filter in place.

[-] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

If the camera has an IR filter, how would IR be able to make night viewing possible?

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

My dude is trying to create a shirt that just continuously recharges and fires EMPs lol

[-] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 6 months ago

OK you're going to need CO2 gas, 2 mirrors, a glass. Container and a high voltage capacitor.

...
Step 3454674) charge the capacitor to 60078V.

Step 5746678) now run!

[-] xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Strap a lidar emitter to yourself. Those car sensors have been shown to damage cameras.

If you want privacy from cameras, there are those hats with strong ir leds. Not sure how well they work.

[-] cloudless@piefed.social 0 points 6 months ago
  1. Create sentient AI
  2. Let AI take control of the internet upon receiving the QR code
  3. Wear your t-shirt containing the QR code, show it to a camera connected to the internet
  4. Now AI takes over the world

Black Mirror S7E4 - Plaything

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

That was an episode that ended right where it started getting good. Not that the episode was bad before that, but it left me wanting more of that, not a jump to a new premise in the next episode.

[-] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

The story of this episofe had enough potential for a 6 episode spinoff series. Or maybe 4. Anyway 1 was way too soon.

[-] remon@ani.social 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's not possible to damage cameras passively, so there isn't an answer. But if it was possible it probably would be made illegal to wear those around cameras.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

More like illegal to wear anywhere in the USA considering that we're quickly becoming a surveillance state.

[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 1 points 6 months ago

Quickly?

Every country is already a surveillance state, and has been for multiple decades.

Just look at Britain with cameras everywhere since at least the 1980's.

Fucking Ring crap just doubled down on it, and idiot people don't even care they're providing the means. 1984 nailed it.

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
10 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

46736 readers
153 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS