I'm a full stack web dev. I use it for HTML and CSS (sometimes) else it's a big waste of time trying to get working modern PHP and JS out of it. Least that's been my experience
I sometime describe it as an intern. Its useful but many of the things its useful for replicates things that addons in the ide did anyway. Its also handy for web searches to be a bit quicker. Ultimately I don't see it going away.
Yes.
Use Claude Sonnet 4
I wouldn't know about professionally as I don't work in the industry, but anecdotally a lot of young people I see use LLMs for everything. Meanwhile in the FOSS community online I see very little of AI/LLMs. I think it's a cultural thing that will vary depending on what circle of people you're looking at.
It's good for what it's good, and bad for what it's bad.
If you only use it for what is good I would suppose it would be easy to be more productive. Sometimes is faster to ask an LLM than trying to surf through pages of SO "repeated question" to get an answer.
I use mostly for things like that, questions, translation between languages (for instance having some working code in one language that you want to quickly translate to other language), boiler plate of well known algorithms and functions.
For full programming development I've no luck to make it work. And trusting it to refactor all your code would be something hilarious.
I do and it’s great for small tasks. Wouldn’t trust it on an existing code base or more than a hundred lines of code.
I always review what it does and often cherry pick stuff
The only thing I vibe code are small websites / front ends because fuck HTML,CSS,JS
I'm okay with AI-powered autocomplete, or with AI-powered mock project generator. Anything beyond that seems like the management's misguided attempt at ~~having more meetings~~raising productivity.
I'm not using AI, and I rarely use IDE, because ugh, code editor is not fullscreen, and I don't need a separate panel to navigate project tree and edit makefiles, I can perfectly use the shell for that, and I don't even need to wiggle the mouse like some graphics designer to debug my code.
I've found in-line completions/suggestions useful at times, but multi-line completions always irritating to the point that I disabled them completely. Much more often I want to read surrounding and following code, and not have it be pushed out of view, and rarely was it useful to me.
Of course, that may be largely the project and use case. (And quite limited experience with it.)
My AI Skeptic Friends Are All Nuts - https://fly.io/blog/youre-all-nuts/
Not sure why you're sharing this. This is one of the worst blog post I've read this year. The amount of name calling is unnecessary, childish. It's just not good.
Programmers are promoted to architects who write high-level specs with a subordinate to do the leg work (AI). I think the hate is because not everyone is good at planning and some people are better at perfecting implementation details, and AI isn't helpful there.
Programming
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev