408
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Ste41th@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

This was bound to happen, and it’s ridiculous

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

I'm getting to the point where I'd rather see csam legalized than this shit. (Keep reading)

Think about it: csam will happen, period. I'm not world's best computer engineer but even Incan build something that embeds data like text or images in other files in ways that cannot be detected. I can build basic but effective encryption that will be hard enough to crack. I can find ways to exchange files outside the internet, hell, do sneakernet

And kids watching porn online? They'll have their buddies who have libraries that will be copied. A single USB drive can contain days of porn videos and you can't stop that either

Then there are these laws that "are to protect children" which makes me just outright want to vomit. You take victims of child pornography and use them for your political gain, for your power. You are almost worse than pedophiles. At least pedophiles harm only one child, you harm all of them you sack of fucking shit.

And no, of course I don't want child pornography legalized, of course not by what is the solution?

These assholes have been at it for decades now and they play the long game. They can lose every year and come back next year. They only have to win once and they move on to he next good thing they can destroy.

So what can we actually really seriously do to stop this?

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 21 hours ago

I think we just have to accept that no solution is 100%. You just need some balance between success and side effects.

As long as people can communicate, it will to some extent spread. So really, the only truly 100% solution would be a couple of nuclear bombs all around the world. Look at that, crime rates went to 0!

I am not really intelligent or knowledgeable enough to provide best-balance solutions.

Anyway, as far as limiting access to porn, perhaps it could be done privately. You could have some trusted verification platform, perhaps even government provided, deal with it with cryptographic signature, maybe as I said, I am too dumb for solutions.
My idea is, the website that wants to verify your age knows the public key of the government provided service used for this purpose (who already has your data anyway), and generates some random data in base64. You copy that, paste it into the verification website, they sign it, and give you the base64-encoded response. You then paste the response into website that wants to verify your age, it verifies the signature and then that you're 18+.

Basically just trusted authority saying "verified being 18+". The website doesn't know who you are, verification system doesn't know what you wanted that verification for.

Of course, you could verify that for anyone else, but I can also walk into a shop, buy cigarettes, alcohol and give them to a kid. Not 100%, but good enough.

[-] menemen@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We had hardcore magazines that circulated back in the days before easy internet. Guess the last time children didn't have access was probably in the 18th century or so.

Guess the next step is controlling all chat groups, emails and cloud spaces to "avoid children exploiting these"...

[-] NoodlePoint@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What an obnoxious excuse, there are far worse problems children have to face besides bad parenting.

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

Watching the children whack off and being judgemental is Yahweh's job, not his ministers.

/s?

[-] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 140 points 2 days ago

Josh Lane was addicted to porn by 14-years-old after first finding it via a Google search when he was aged 12.

Now 25 and happily married.

Wow. Porn really destroyed this mans life. What a tragic tale.

[-] DistrictSIX@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Addiction to porn is not a real thing. No reputable source classifies compulsive viewing of porn as an addiction as far as I know. These people just find it to be a convenient excuse for their compulsions.

[-] MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 64 points 2 days ago

If jacking off constantly at age 14 doomed a person we would never have left the Miocene epoch.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] synapse1278@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

He told Newsnight the addiction caused him to isolate himself from friends and family because he was "afraid of anyone discovering that I was hooked."

Mr Lane described finding "the only place I could get, I guess, love and intimacy was from pornography" at the same time as feeling "heaps of guilt and shame"

The problem seems to have more to do with lack of proper sex education and social pressure rather than pornography. Why did he have to feel so ashamed that he isolated himself? That's a real issue here!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 156 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Why not just gouge out their eyeballs, it's the only way to make sure!

Oh, what's that, it's not actually about the porn, it's about getting everyone to self-submit personal info to your shitty databases? Ooh, ok, gotcha!

Edit: sorry about the non-sequitur, I'm losing my fucking mind...

[-] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 57 points 2 days ago

It's so weird. Just don't give your kids unrestricted internet access if you're concerned about any of this...

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

It feels like a return of the pornography/video games/rock music moral panic of the late 20th century. I wish these conservative idiots would just fuck off. We'll do anything before we tackle things that are really affecting children. Like poverty and hunger, in one of the world's richest countries. We're a joke of a country, no wonder people keep making fun of us. We deserve it.

[-] TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 84 points 2 days ago

Honestly, it feels more sinister. Sure, they say they want to eliminate this privacy tool because children could use it to watch porn, but realistically they’re not a fan of anybody using a VPN.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I know none of this is actually about protecting kids... But even if it was, their reasoning and methodology sucks.

some of the 16 to 21-year-olds surveyed saying they had viewed it "aged six or younger".

So there may have been a problem at least 10 years ago. Does that problem still exist? (never mind the obvious "is the problem parents ignoring their kids on a tablet"...)

Josh Lane was addicted to porn by 14-years-old after first finding it via a Google search when he was aged 12.

Okay, now let's address the parents being the problem. By default, Google's "Safe Search" is on, and the kid actively searched for porn. So no parental supervision of the 12 year old kid on the internet. Someone setup a google account, and changed the default settings to show those results. (oh, but that person is 25 now, so that was also 13 years ago...)

Almost all of the big websites have parental control settings that would alleviate the vast majority of these "problems" if parents actually used them. Parents being willfully ignorant isn't going to be resolved by legislation. They know that. This is all a smoke screen to put the entire population behind a firewall and control the narrative. It isn't even a very thick smoke screen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] irmadlad@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

I've been biting my tongue hard these past few months in a concerted effort not to be offensive. I'm not trying to be intentionally offensive, however, I feel there is an element in this situation that is being disregarded in favor of someone else doing your work. When I say 'You', Your', etc, I mean it in the royal sense. So, warm up the downvote finger and man the flame throwers.

If it's genuinely for the children, then when are we going to require parents to be parents? Look, you brought this service into your home voluntarily. You might say 'Well I need it for work' or 'I need it for school'. Tons of people use hundreds of thousands of hotspots daily to do their thing on the internet. This service you voluntarily brought into your house, has both the ability to be highly beneficial and highly detrimental all in the same breath. Technology always, always, always wields a double edged sword.

And what do the majority of parents do with such power? They give it to their vulnerable, under aged, highly curious, children, un-monitored, uncensored, and uninhibited. Are you insane? So when little Johnny is caught surfing porn hub, the parents freak and cry out to their government 'We need to ban porn!' No! What we need is for parents to be parents.

There are literally hundreds of services, and ways to lock down your internet. I hear parents say 'I'm not technologically inclined.' Get there. The safety and well being of your children hang in the balance. Take a class at your local Tech College. I'd be willing to bet that when little Johnny's mom was pregnant, she most likely did some reading on the topic. Some even take a class on childbirth. The internet should be no different. Access one or two of the billions of tuts out on the internet.

Now, will locking down your internet like a multi-billion dollar enterprise with a Brinks Kit keep little Johnny from seeing some skin? No! Why? Because it's natural for humans to want to see what other humans look like naked. Children are naturally inquisitive. The prime directive of all life is to replicate. So, have frank, open, direct, and yes, awkward conversations with your children. Let them know in no uncertain terms what is acceptable on your network. Tell them why these things are not appropriate for their age group. This relationship with your children starts at Day 1.

You have 18 years of boot camp to equip your children with all the tools necessary to make wise, prudent decisions in life. You probably taught them how to ride a bicycle, or drive a car, or any number of teaching opportunities parents have with their children. The internet should be no different. We live in a technological time line that is ever changing, so it behooves parents to know exactly what is going on with their technology and how their children are using it. Get with it.

Being a parent takes work. Being a network administrator also takes work. Anyone who is a seasoned veteran of this chan knows, to secure a network in order to be as private, secure, and anonymous as possible on the internet, takes work. I find, a large portion of parents are unwilling to do the work and would rather fob off their responsibilities as a parent, to the government having jurisdiction. I'm not painting all parents with this brush. Kudos to parents who are very involved in their children's lives. There are enough of them tho, that are not, and this is a big issue. It gives governments the justification they desire to surveil their citizenry.

Let the roast begin.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] untorquer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Even if kids see porn the lessons they learn are directly a result of how their parents approach the topic with them. Public education can't functionally provide useful sex ed due to politics.

I guess if you can blame your kids for breaking the law you never have to have "the talk" with them.

[-] Gaja0@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago

I mean who was asking for the government to show their ID to view porn as the solution to children having access to pornographic material (has never been an issue until now randomly)

[-] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Don't believe for a second that this is about children.

Imagine the policies of someone who actually cared about children's wellbeing? Those policies would not look like bans or restrictions for the children.

[-] Squiddork@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Google and Microsoft have to be dragged kicking and squealing into proper policy that actually damages their business models.

They have been completely silent on these age verification checks, in Aus this is being implemented by an un-elected government official whose career was largely working for Microsoft for the past 20 years.

This is all about data mining.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 68 points 2 days ago
[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Talk more openly about how none of these people give a fuck about protecting kids, and just want to ~~make life shitty for everyone including them~~ grab power.

Point out bad faith and don't let it be about anything else, until it actually is. We can't get anywhere because nobody's actually dealing with the actual situation, which is people lying publicly.

Stop going along with that shit. Every time you talk about the fake issue, you're helping them by pretending they're telling the truth when they aren't.

[-] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

Its simple. Give them more control and power over you or youre a pedophile.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] onlooker@lemmy.ml 61 points 2 days ago

How about parents supervise their own kids them-fuckin'-selves?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PacketPilot@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Honestly I think access to AI chatbots at an early age is way more harmful to the developing brain. Character.ai is a very popular platform among younger gen z. LLMs are giving grown adults full blown psychosis, where's all the concern for the children when it comes to a dangerous tool like that? What a bunch of geriatric fucking clowns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 2 days ago

This is so fucking stupid, you cannot stop VPNs, because things like ShadowSocks exist. When will they learn that the only way to stop VPNs is to disable the internet completely. As long as the internet exists, VPNs will too. Ask your friend Xi Jinping about that.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] riskable@programming.dev 40 points 2 days ago

I guess it's just too late for all those children that viewed porn. The piles of their dead bodies must be enormous!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DreamAccountant@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Same religious garbage they've been trying to pull for the last 75+ years.

"Someone think of the CHILDREN!!!".

They scream, as they take away your rights to information, privacy, and anything else that they possibly can. They don't want you to have rights.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

children figuring out VPNs in a week while these bumfucks (state that they) didn't manage to understand it in the years they've been given just goes to show the many orders of magnitudes of difference in their intelligence

[-] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 day ago

No, this is intentional, the ultimate goal is a censored internet a la China. This was just the easiest gateway to doing that.

They are coming for VPNs next.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ideonek@piefed.social 39 points 2 days ago

Stop blocking Wikipedia

[-] Soot@hexbear.net 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Governments have persistently censored and surveilled the internet ever-more on the basis of "but the children :(" without ever doing a single actually good thing for the children like decreasing class sizes or letting parents spend more time with their children. Both of which would actually help address the issue.

This is the equivalent of abstinence education, just keep 'em ignorant and then when they finally see porn on superundergroundillegalporn.com.illegal it'll just be 10x worse.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Could we take wind out of the excuse "it's to protect the children" by implementing a signal like DoNotTrack/GPC but for NSFW content?

[-] pieman@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

I think they will ban vpns but as this article hints at, more regulation

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

So SSH tunneling it is

That is until encryption is outlawed altogether making the internet truly a horrible place to be

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
408 points (99.0% liked)

Privacy

41055 readers
559 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS