53
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

There's a lot of people on here who are part of what I'd call losing causes, causes that run counter to the consumerist capitalist mono-culture, I.e. socialism, veganism, FOSS, anti-car urbanism, even lemmy and the fediverse.

I want to know what made you switch from being a sympathizer to an active participant. I believe it's important for us to understand what methods work in getting people involved in a movement that may not have any immediate wins to motivate people to join.

EDIT: A lot of people objecting to my use of losing so I'll explain more, all of these causes benefit from popularity and are weakened by there lack of adoption and are thus in direct competition with the capitalist consumerist mono-culture, a competition which they are currently losing.

  • Socialism on a small scale cannot solve the inherent issues of a capitalism that surrounds it.

  • Veganism benefits from more people becoming vegan and restaurants and grocery stores providing vegan options.

  • FOSS, or more specifically desktop Linux, benefits from more people being on it and software developers designing for and maintaining applications for it.

  • The more people that use transit, the more funding it gets and the better it gets.

  • the fediverse benefits from more people veing on it and more diverse communities so those with niche interests besides the above causes can find community here.

On the flip side the capitalist consumerist alternatives to all of these benefit from there popularity and thus offer a better value to most people. The question is about what made you defer that better immediate material value in favor of something else.

(page 2) 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago

because the alternatives are unconscionable. Consumerist capitalist mono-culture is going to eat its own tail and kill everyone in the process.

I do think theory is a very good way to recruit people. When the facts are presented fairly, rational people will not choose capitalism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

1: Because it's historically been the nature of these causes that they're losing right up until the moment they win. Seems impossible till it's done, journey of a thousand miles, single step and all that.

2: pure spite towards the smug, arrogant and cruel status quo supporters. I will.never give them the satisfaction of falling into despair, from hell's heart I stab at them

[-] chobeat@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Because it’s historically been the nature of these causes that they’re losing right up until the moment they win. Seems impossible till it’s done, journey of a thousand miles, single step and all that.

That's survivor bias. Sometimes it goes like that, but in the vast majority of cases you just lose. This narrative is toxic because it keeps people stuck into an anti-strategic mindset, turning politics into morality and making all of us worse off.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

I follow my conscience, and I work hard to live up to my principles. If I didn't, I would have a hard time living with myself.

[-] Battle_Masker@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago

The saying is "if you build it, they will come," not "if a couple million people want an alternative enough, one will materialize out of thin air"

[-] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago

I don’t really understand why you think a lot of these things are losing causes. FOSS is the backbone of IT. Anti-car urbanism is common in some areas of the world. Lemmy and the Fediverse have been doing great over the last 2 years. Socialism/leftist ideology is on the rise alongside the fascist takeover—it would have been unheard of to have “the squad” in the 90’s.

So where you see losing, I see slow and steady progress happening alongside capitalist fascism that is trying and failing to stop it completely.

[-] chobeat@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago

FOSS is the backbone of IT

FOSS is the backbone of a mlitiary-corporate monstrous machine of death and exploitation. I get that originally the movement was more concerned with the freedom of software than the freedom of people, but I would say "FOSS being a force for good" is definitely a battle that was lost.

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

The part that gets me is why it's slow. I figured it out, what's taking everyone else so long?

[-] chobeat@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Because you live in a bubble and your needs are not the needs of the vast majority of human on Earth. Also change is not a matter of opinions or conscience, it's a matter of organizing and building power. Most people can agree on a topic without anything changing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nemo@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 day ago

It's the right cause, and if enough people join it won't be losing anymore.

[-] Tabitha@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

lol FOSS is winning, if you're paying $20/month/seat for every calculator app that you might use once, you're probably the looser.

Because I’m right.

[-] ComradeMiao@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Most of the causes you list are not defined by losing so idek what this is asking

[-] Feyd@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago

I sincerely believe that none of these are losing. In fact I suspect in the future the current "winning" sides will be viewed as inexplicable barbarism, the same way that making sacrifices for good harvests would be viewed today.

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

It's not a losing cause if it's growing

[-] chobeat@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago

The last 30 years of activism prove you quite wrong

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] monovergent@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago

When debating the efficacy of my privacy measures, my friend asked,

You know, what if it just is compromised already? By the NSA, Facebook, Google, and so forth.

And I said, at least I am making it known that I hate them all, I'll stand up for what is right, and I'm not leaving without a fight.

[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago
[-] DeceasedPassenger@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Because I was raised on media that glorified the plight of the underdog, beset against on all sides by powerful forces. And my grandpa told me "The hardest things in life are the things most worth doing."

I have kids... so clearly yes.

[-] darthelmet@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I think the interesting thing about the US is that its propaganda sews the seeds for eventual dissent. It runs on ideals about freedom, democracy, equality, individualism, progress, prosperity, etc. The national mythology isn’t “fuck all the poor people.” The trouble is, the US isn’t any of these things. It just makes it hard to recognize that or what the alternatives are. So I wouldn’t say I moved along the political spectrum as much as I slowly started to notice that I wasn’t where I thought I was. You grow up seeing Obama go from “Hope and Change” to continuing to do all the wars, torture, and spying… it makes you realize “hey I don’t think these people were being honest about sharing my values.” And it’s just a long, slow trip from there to figuring out what movements actually represent your politics.

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago

America as it stands is toast. The ship's hit the iceburg. Change is coming sooner or later because it's visably broken

[-] shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Well said!!

[-] dil@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

I learned about them, liked them, changed my views (if I had to) to reflect what I've learned.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Maybe I wouldn't consider them losing causes, since we have our small wins here and there. Every positive difference you make, is rewarding when it amounts even to the tiniest win. You posting this question and other Lemmings like me answering is itself a little Lemmy W.

But yeah, things for me don't have value only because they are popular. Yes, popularity can affect that I get recommended stuff that I end up liking, but I consciously reject being told to like something without being aware of the full details.

Here's some contrasting examples: PEAK is a game I got on the bandwagon for, after seeing it posted on GamingOnLinux via !pcgaming@lemmy.ca . Seeing the gameplay, it looked like fun, and I had friends to play it with so it was worthwhile. On the other hand, trends like Stanley Cup, blindbox toys like Labubu, "Dubai Chocolate", I'm not going to get any of those, despite their explosive popularity, unless I see a legitimate use for my own needs.

Also, my values are set towards lasting ownership of stuff then renting/BNPL schemes.

[-] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

At this point, being on this planet is a losing cause.

I strongly disagree that unpopular things are automatically a losing cause though. I use and do some unpopular things because it's more ethical or more beneficial overall, but I'm not at all troubled with it. I just try to be a somewhat decent citizen where many others would just be like "lol I don't care about any consequences, just give me the cheapest or most convenient option". I'm not like that. And I think more people shouldn't be. But, again, at this point... it's definitely a losing battle. But I still do it because then I can tell myself that I at least tried to do the somewhat right thing. It's kind of just to have a clean conscience, whereas some others are completely fine burning the world for their own short-term gain. That's basically the difference.

[-] breadguy@kbin.earth 5 points 1 day ago

somebody gotta do it

[-] AnotherUsername@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

I'm adopting FOSS because commercial products are inevitably enshitified for profit. Fuck the billionaires, I like my money and my personal data and I am not ok with them putting their grubby, sticky little fingers in my personal shit. I was raised a private person and I like my privacy.

I'm not vegan but I reduced my red and pork to 0 because it's unhealthy and I don't really like eating things for breakfast that are as smart as small children. Ew.

I fucking hate cars and always have. They smell bad, they're expensive, they take up huge amounts of time, and idiots on a power trip are always being assholes in them. Coal rolling trucks make me want to puke in disgust. It's always a guy and he's always a dropout moron on a power trip who's gonna die of lung cancer at 56 while complaining about chemtrails.

Socialism is necessary because capitalism promotes the tragedy of the commons and I like my clean air and drinkable water. I grew up on stories about the wilderness, I lived running around in the woods, I value a healthy ecosystem rich in genetic diversity. I am also an absolutely enormous asshole at heart who is cheap as fuck and who hates litter, and homeless people are untidy, expensive, and dangerous. Sticking them in apartments to keep their shitty decisions out of my view is cheaper than cleaning up their feces all the time and dealing with begging and grabbing and crime, and it makes me able to ignore them more easily. Out of sight, out of mind, I get to live my life in peace knowing they're not homeless anymore. Also their kids don't deserve that shit even if their parents are depressed abusive junkie trash who couldn't keep a job if it was "lay here all day long".

[-] Kuori@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

better to be ~~feared~~ right than ~~loved~~ popular

or something like that

[-] blackstampede@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Well, I was born here and it seemed like the thing to do.

[-] solidsnake@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Education. Good luck

[-] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Knowing something's right - yet dying/loosing - doesn't make it not worth it. You might just end up without the thing. But at least you weren't part of its downfall nor responsible. Quite the contrary.

I guess it's that simple. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.

[-] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think I was broke at a young age to stand by things I think are true even if I'm liked less. There's definitely something to be said for social cohesion but I already have a lot of issues with hating myself and a lot of things that American society demands of me for social cohesion involve hating myself for more things that are less and less problematic.

So eventually it's just easier to identify with being a "principled" pariah. And then all the pro-social concessions I actually do make are things I can keep to myself to preserve that identity.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
  • FOSS - Because I have been in it since almost the beginning of my tech career (first Linux was Red Hat Halloween) and in a tangential manner have helped it along in many ways. It's my default.
  • Veganism - Technically I am an inveg (involuntary vegan). I was pushed into a whole food plant based diet because it turns out I am genetically predisposed to coronary disease and absurdly high levels of cholesterol, arterial plaque, and inflammation. Built to run hard and die young, and I'm all out of young.
  • Fediverse - I am old enough to remember the old Internet and the Fediverse has a bit of that vibe. This is probably Lemmy leans more Gen-X/Xennial than other platforms.
  • UBI and other Socialist safeguards - I am a capitalist but I am more so a pragmatist. If we do not ensure the survival, viability of the population and access to the means of success to majority, then the system will collapse and we will all be fucked. Rich, poor and everyone in between. It's just common sense. Rich fucks and politicians are always focused on fast, short term gains and never in longevity and sustained success.
  • Netrunner CCG - Because it's just the best card game ever made (sorry MtG, but it's true). I buy every new set, even if I don't have anyone to play with anymore.

I have no doubt there are many other lost causes I support or follow that I am blissfully ignorant of their niche status.

EDIT:

  • Final Space - I pre-ordered the book so I can find out how it ends.
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 1 day ago

I was pushed into a whole food plant based diet because it turns out I am genetically predisposed to coronary disease and absurdly high levels of cholesterol, arterial plaque, and inflammation. Built to run hard and die young, and I’m all out of young.

Have you been keeping a eye on atherosclerosis with imaging like CAC scores?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
53 points (76.8% liked)

Asklemmy

50034 readers
564 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS