85
submitted 3 months ago by Redditsux@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 27 points 3 months ago

This isn't a joke it's testing the waters.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

This is always how he starts things.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago

yeah love how they always call it jokes. The only jokes trump involves himself with is himself and the people he brings into his circle.

[-] Landless2029@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

He's not testing the waters.

He's normalizing the illegal discourse.

[-] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

And if he does that. Expect people to do some nasty business in response to his dictatorship.

[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

I really don't have hope in Americans to do so. I hope I'm wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 months ago

He isn't joking and you shouldn't pretend he is

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Dang... he's still alive. Maybe tomorrow.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Ya’ll think the US will ever collectively understand that they can’t keep pretending like these things are jokes or “wouldn’t actually happen”? I swear, Trump could grow a little mustache and people would be saying “oh no, I can’t believe we’re about to fall into fascism!”.

[-] RangerAndTheCat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago

No. Literally warned people and yelled at them that we would be inviting kidnappings (ICE), abortion rights, and gay rights, civil rights… damn there is so much that has already has happened. He can do no wrong to his base and the Supreme Court here and congress has pretty much given him free rein. The cognitive dissonance is astounding.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I guess if they keep pretending it’s only ever “just getting started” they can pretend as if their inaction was warranted.

[-] RangerAndTheCat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah pretty much “we have to wait and see” is what is frequently parroted after everything I have said to try to get these people to see the massive error that is going kill them and the rest of us with them.

Honestly the Trump/ Epstein thing is the closest I’ve seen them wake up too this time (since we’re shown the evidence when it first blew) , but this time it doesn’t seem to be sliding down as easily, but I’m almost positive Trump will find a distraction e.g. such as war…

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

We've had elections during a war before and we can do it again. Ukrainian laws don't apply to the US.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, the law pertaining to not holding elections during martial law in Ukraine was created during another person's presidency as well. He didn't make that. (It stemmed from Russias invasion into Ukraine in 2014, law made in 2015). Zelensky didn't become president until 2019.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CircaV@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago

He’s telling everyone what his plan is. War incoming by Jan 2029.

[-] Steve@startrek.website 8 points 3 months ago
[-] Dadifer@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago
[-] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Hey guys I hearn fücking kïbs is cööl nöw :DDDDDDDDD

[-] Steve@startrek.website 5 points 3 months ago

GOPedo Bear

[-] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Oh no, pedo bear is back.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago

Could this be why his aids looked "pallid" after his meeting with Putin?

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

It's possible his aides had it in their head that they're the "good guys" and fully bought into the propaganda that Trump was going to save America and then had their whole realities shook when they saw Trump and Putin talking together in perfect English talking about their callous conspiracies to wreck nations and crush people they hate together.

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 8 points 3 months ago

We didn't cancel elections during the Civil War.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

This guy is just such a dickhead. The type of people that still support this asshole are very much telling on themselves.

Probably watched Archie Bunker and rooted for him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

News flash people, he's not fuckin joking. Arm yourselves while you can.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Can he have a stroke or massive heart attack or something already? Fucking hell man. Nature never takes the ones it should.

[-] nomy@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

Then they 25th Amendment him and install JDV as Thiels hand-picked successor. Somehow speedrunning our way into some weird techno-fascist hellacspe faster than we already are.

Or he could've already had one. Allegedly Reagan was declining for years and the people around him successfully hid it until he was out of office.

lol cool so he just said the quiet part of the playbook out loud.

For those in the back: he’s gonna get the US in to a Serious Fucking War right before the next election so that he can pretend he’s got justification to call off elections.

Pay no mind to the fact that FDR won his third term at the peak of WW2.

Come to think of it: that’s probably why he wants to do it: he knows he probably can’t win another election (putting aside the illegality of running and serving for a third term), and doesn’t want to think about himself being overshadowed by “some old librul Democrat from the 1940s”. And yes, that is a completely serious guesstimate on orangeboi’s rationale for this.

[-] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

Legally, it won't matter. He doesn't hold office until the next guy, his term ends in 2029. If there is no replacement, the office is simply vacant, and we already have processes for that.

Legally, it won't matter. If (when) he's ignoring the laws to that level, it doesn't matter what anyone pretends happened with an election. The laws will have no bearing anyway.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

So who's he going to invade? Mexico or Canada?

[-] CircaV@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

If he tries to invade Canada, Canada’s gonna party like it’s 1814 and we gonna light up the WH - again.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] CircaV@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

So did they cancel elections when US invaded Iraq? Afghanistan? Vietnam? Nah… but Trump just wants to cancel elections. He is a dictator. Since there’s nothing and no one stopping him - there’s no reason why he won’t just do it. It’s what 70 million Americans wants anyway.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We've had one Afghan invasion, yes. But what about second Afghan invasion?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

I would say this is impeachable if they already didn't make such a joke out of the punishment.

[-] habitualcynic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yes he did, and he definitely wants to. Now… where are the Epstein files?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

I'm convinced putin recommended this.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

I'm positive that would only apply, if the US was actually invaded and/or occupied by a hostile power. If it's just the US bombing some other country, then why would local politics be affected?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
85 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26462 readers
644 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS