157
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

These are the cheapest source of new electricity, and are generally cheaper than running existing coal-burning power plants

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 59 points 3 weeks ago

Fuck Trump and the billionaires who prop him up. Every gas and oil CEOs and board members should he hunted for sport.

[-] zd9@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks now we have a starting list.

[-] Zomg@piefed.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Don't say we if you ain't though.

[-] zd9@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

That's not why I shared that though. They need to be tried and put in prison for their crimes, but I never said hunted...

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 3 weeks ago
[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 21 points 3 weeks ago

When do we just start ignoring this clown? Build them without his approval.

[-] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

I want to try this way

[-] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Already are.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

No new telephone cables! You must keep paying into the telegraph monopolies!

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

So much for "all of the above" energy promises from Bergum/GOP. This is also the backdoor way of sabotaging the Big Beautiful Oligrachy bill that fought to keep subsidies for renewable projects that connected on time to grid: Make sure none of them can.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Suiciding the mid and long-term economic prospects of the US for the sake of populism (it's literally already cheaper to go renewable than use fossil fuels, even the cheapest which is gas, plus the main side effects of widespread use of a technology is all those companies that pop up in that tech domain so blocking approval of renewable projects in the US, means American companies in that domain will be less likely to succeed that those in other countries).

And this happens right alongside with betting like crazy in a technological direction - the most bubbly and with less specific uses parts of AI, such as LLMs - which is so far is deeply net negative in economic terms - it costs way more in energy than it delivers in increased efficiency - and whose rate of improvement has already fallen massivelly so is unlikely to become a net positive across the Economy - though there will certainly be specific net positive areas, just not massivelly so - were curiously, the Chinese with their models that consume much less power, have already done more to make it net positive than American companies.

China's work to take over as the world's superpower has never been this easy.

[-] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Wheres the GOP free market?...

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
157 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7302 readers
176 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS