59
Who agrees? (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

What about the shareholders! Think of the shareholders!!! Won't someone think of the shareholders!!!!

[-] phonics@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

are shareholders truly that evil or is the company using them as scapegoats? like are shareholders seriously angry about not making massive growth? and if so, fuck em. they're just gambling anyway.

[-] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Have you ever heard of shareholders suing a CEO or Company for not being aggressive enough on profit making ? It does happen, shareholders are pure scum !

[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

As someone in the repair industry, I can tell you this meme is nonsense.

Refurbished, reused, repaired, or otherwise remanufactured parts are almost always inferior to new ones. That’s not opinion, that’s reality. They’ve always been worse and always will be, at least until corporations stop playing the profit maximization game.

The truth is, these companies don’t care about quality. Their only goal is to spend the absolute minimum making old parts “usable” again, which leads to a massive percentage of defective components flooding the market.

[-] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Eh. Single use plastics are REALLY useful in certain areas of healthcare where sterility is important. Especially for vascular access devices. Nothing is going to beat the ability of plastic to:

  1. stay sterile on a shelf for months to years at a time, so that it can safely be used to bypass 90% of a person's immune system to give lifesaving medication and reliably produce quality samples for testing

  2. do it while being flexible enough to not damage the vasculature permanently or in a way that causes enough damage / inflammation to render the access point unusable

  3. Yet be resistant enough to breakdown that it's unlikely to break off in a large enough chunk that could migrate and damage the brain heart or lungs.

And I suspect someone who works OR has a way longer and more interesting list than I do.

Now there are other areas in healthcare that plastics could be significantly reduced. The big one that occurs to me is hygiene supplies. We use a lot of single use wet wipes and bed pads with plastic backings. If we were willing to give direct care workers more time to spend with each patient they could make better use of washcloths, washable bed pads, etc.

But there are a select few use cases where I expect plastic to outperform all alternatives for the foreseeable future.

[-] phneutral@feddit.org 1 points 6 months ago

Some years ago I read an article that more and more hospitals (in Germany) are getting rid of their sterilisation facilities, because single use tools can be ordered in bulk and the facilities + personnel are costly. Profit-driven healthcare is such a nightmare for the environment.

[-] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

It's not like sterilizing is free either, it uses a lot of heat energy which in most places means you're burning methane on the grid. That also releases co2 emissions.

[-] Forbo@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Would be interesting to see which uses more energy. Implementing a carbon tax would surface those costs pretty quickly.

[-] Tartletboy1@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 6 months ago

Can confirm, I worked as a vendor for both OR facilities and various laboratories. It's something I've been thinking of for a while, actually. Single use plastics are so important to both areas of healthcare I don't see how we can reduce their usage. It's one of the few cases I know where not using plastic has a risk of actually killing a number of people due to inferior quality or cross contamination.

[-] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Plastic that can break down and compost with high heat and moisture and time is basically the goal for pollution concerns. But it's naturally resistant so making it being able to break down when you want but still be durable and waterproof isn't easy and will probably never be as cheap.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

The problem is we are only paying for half the lifecycle of the product. Start charging disposal fees to companies for every plastic/non-recycleable bit, and your head will spin at how fast they can get us 90-100% repairable, recyclable, and re-useable products.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

I think it should work like bottle deposits.

Make producers pay a fee per unit of crap they make - plastic, forever chemicals, whatever - and then refund them based on the amount they can remove from the environment and store safely.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Prime example here is refrigerators. If you get a leak in the refrigerant line, your refrigerator is pretty much toast. I found this out the hard way when I wanted to repair one. They don't even have taps that you could refill it with. I had assumed there would be something like with a car's air conditioner where you could add refrigerant and recharge it. Instead, it's a closed system and because of the way that they are designed, to recharge a refrigerator well over $3,000, because the technician has to tap into the line and reseal it after they top it off which requires specialized tools, so basically if anything happens with that system, you're better off buying a whole new refrigerator. Super wasteful design imo. I guess one could argue that by making it not sealed it could be more prone to leaks over time, but it's still wild that you don't have the option of filling it with maybe 10 bucks worth of refrigerant and instead have to scrap the whole machine.

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I mean, I fix my own fridges and appliances and do small appliance work for my friends and neighbors, but I already own the required tools so I’m really just charging for some time and the refrigerant.

134a is still cheap, and no company worth their salt should be charging a fee to customers so that specialized tools can be purchased. If you don’t own the tools of the trade, that’s a company problem, not a customer problem.

3000 dollars was a “I don’t want to do it price”

For people I don’t know, I do charge about 300 bucks to just show up, because that covers operating costs and an hour of my time. But unless the system was pulling into a vacuum, it shouldn’t take longer than an hour or so to recover the refrigerant, patch the leak, pull a vacuum, and recharge. So yeah, if your fridge is only worth 500 bucks, it’s not worth it. But if it’s an expensive fridge it might be worth it to find an appliance technician that will charge you a fair rate to repair the damage.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

I might have misremembered the price. I just remember it being prohibitively expensive vs just getting another fridge. I ended up just getting a free one off nextdoor n tossing the old one. It was a garage fridge. Having said that, I can see what you're saying about if someone had a higher end fridge.

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I actually love doing appliance repair as side jobs. Most of the time it’s a cheap part that I have on hand and it’s a quick fix.

Unfortunately, just my hourly rate usually makes some people second guess if it’s a good idea, which is fair, because manufacturers have made their products so bare bones and cheap that is often cheaper to buy a new one then have someone diagnose and repair it. It’s a real shame, because you do end up with literal tons of equipment that gets scrapped every day because of a 10 dollar relay or capacitor that went bad.

[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

They have piercing valves that cost a few bucks, shredder valves are also less than five dollars. These are typical and easy repairs for for household refrigeration. I do it daily.

Depending on what the job requires it's 125 to 500 to refill a system.

Most fridge manufacturers don't put access valves on their sealed systems because they cost more money and are significantly more prone to leaking.

[-] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Add practically to the first statement

[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I make things for a living. Every time I order screws, brackets, or any other small component, it dawns on me how many more single use plastic bags we use than most people realize. I've been making this big thing at work that uses a ton of aluminum extrusion (aka 8020) and we've been using a ton of these little corner brackets. Every. Single. Bracket. Comes in this plastic bag. Inside the plastic bag there is another plastic bag that contains 4 screws and 4 T-nuts, and a 3rd plastic bag that contains the bracket itself. I started making a bag full of little bags like a year ago with the intention of reusing them, but the bag is now full of several hundred crumpled up little bags and I've used maybe a dozen. I've stopped saving them. On this project alone we're probably going to use over 150 of those little brackets. We have a small operation, I can't even imagine how many little bags an actual factory goes through in a single day.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 0 points 6 months ago

Literally everything can be resold.

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago
[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

They can be resold. We're just living in a world where WE don't allow that.

But it's possible to do.

You have software. Tim wants software. Well fuck Tim. Sell it to Steve instead. Now Steve pays you money. Now Steve has the software. You don't anymore.

See? Done.

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago

Why not just make copies and then everyone can enjoy the same software for free? smh

[-] altphoto@lemmy.today 0 points 6 months ago

I'll give you an idea....my wife keeps all the thin plastic food containers from when we bring food from a restaurant. Now we have hundreds of reusable containers. We don't need to buy new plastic containers or plates!

So instead of selling the food in thin containers that eventually become planters or paint buckets, why not let people bring their own Tupperware or plates from home?

[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

So instead of selling the food in thin containers that eventually become planters or paint buckets, why not let people bring their own Tupperware or plates from home?

Food safety reasons. The restaurant then has to clean any random container people bring in, because it represents a contamination risk to the kitchen.

[-] HeurtisticAlgorithm9@feddit.uk 0 points 6 months ago

Surely there is a word starting with re- for compost...

[-] Bratosch@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Recomposted 👍

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 0 points 6 months ago

Which includes fossil fuels & other things we burn & release as gases.

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

OK, no more fossil fuels. Now what?

[-] Zink@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago

Everything else? Right now I think advances in battery tech are what would help the most.

And maybe you could label Uranium and Thorium as "fossil" fuels if you want to be picky about it, but I think nuclear fission is the "bridge fuel" that we needed when we were sold natural gas instead.

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

Batteries aren't energy sources, and frankly, nuclear power sucks.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

Batteries make the current cheap renewables more practical. The cheap green energy is there but it doesn't run on our schedule.

I would suggest that nuclear both rules and sucks, lol. It could be a far safer and cleaner alternative to fossil fuels that we are still burning every second by the ton, including all the toxic and radioactive shit coal brings us.

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

11259 readers
254 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS