6
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm not a plant scientist or a physicist - but don't these findings overlap pretty precisely by the spectrum chart of visible, infrared, and near-UV light that is emitted by hot objects? Ie: black body radiation curves?

Its not novel to note that animals (broadly) emit heat when alive. Damaged plants also show higher temps due to sap/fluid flowing to the damaged area and then being unable to regulate their temp as usual, so under the same light conditions - a damaged plant next to an undamaged plant will show more heat radiation along the areas of damage, as well as some added heat in areas of high water content on both plants - which seems to be what the images show?

I don't have full access to the study, but the summary doesn't mention black body radiation curves at all, and you'd think it would if they'd discounted it? Sure black body curves go very high, but this study has used very sensitive cameras to detect 'single photons' so if there is any heat radiation, they'd pick it up.

1000114333

Cue the religious whack-a-loons claiming this as proof of a soul in 3...2...1...

21 gram soul thing all over again.

[-] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 0 points 6 days ago

Cue the carnist whack-a-loons claiming this as proof that eating plants is just as immoral as eating animals in 3…2…1…

[-] Hule@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

I use Arch...

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
6 points (75.0% liked)

Hacker News

2680 readers
505 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS