16
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Prunebutt@slrpnk.net to c/yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com

I wrote in this post that I'm uncomfortaple to argue "genetical[ly] or genealogical[ly]" why people "belong" in some place or another. I think that's ethno-nationalist reasoning and a "weapon of the enemy" reasoning applies. Even if it's in favour of Palestinians.

But apparently, that's "settler-colonialist apologism" for dessalines. Ethno-nationalism is ok if it's targeting "the right" people, I guess. /s

I think the reasoning of the comment removal is bollocks. Just because I don't want to argue why someone "belongs" someplace because of their genes, I'm not all of a sudden in favour of settler-colonialism.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Need to pick one: 'genetics' OR 'geneology' on this topic.

They're extensively different and blurring the two allows the discussion to pivot between them, which maximizes the potential for misconstruing points or taking them deliberately out of context.

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

I disagree with the removal but you are wrong. Anti settler colonialism in Palestine use this argument of genetics and genealogical because those where exactly the main justification of Zionists forcing a state on the local Palestinians population. Many Zionists claim that they had has the right to create an ethnostate because of 2000 years old Jewish kingdom and continuous presence in the land while at the same time saying Palestinians are just Arab colonizers that should be transferred to other Arab countries while Israel take all the historical Palestine

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

So wouldn’t it make more sense to completely undermine this idea? Staking a similar claim makes it more debatable since both groups have at least superficially convincing historical narratives in play. And with anti-Palestinian racism being so commonplace in the west, people are biased towards Israeli narratives.

Whereas acknowledging that people always have a right to stay in their homeland just immediately undermines the exile and evictions involved in Israel’s colonialist project. It’s simple and easy to understand and directly rooted in basic human rights that everyone can empathize with.

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No, we are not using the same type of argument to prove us right but to prove them wrong. There is people who really believe Zionists stupidest claims so yes it is important to use the same logic just to prove that the argument is so stupid and contradictory.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I just think by engaging in this argument you give it credence, and it’s such a confusing and technical one that most people aren’t going to understand or have the ability to debunk anything, so they’ll just go with their political affiliation.

I mean does the argument that European Jews have a claim to some distant land because some of their ancestors came from there hundreds to thousands of years ago really need to engaged with as a serious argument? I don’t think this really has much weight if you think about it.

Like, I have European ancestry. The implication here is I should be able to go back to those countries and kick someone out of their home just because of this fact? It’s a ridiculous and extremely violent idea. I think that’s going to be a lot easier to get people to see than quibbling about what percent of Jewish ancestors came from here or there.

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I mean does the argument that European Jews have a claim to some distant land because some of their ancestors came from there hundreds to thousands of years ago really need to engaged with as a serious argument?

Considered the amount of time i see this argument on social media show that the argument is a serious argument from zionists so yeah i think it is important to adress it

Just look at the far right demonstration in the uk. They couldn't gather as much people few years ago despite the ideology they hold that no civilized people should accept them

Even a ridiculous theory like fat earth is gaining popularity, 2% of Americans believe in it that's 6 millions people

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Eeegh, This is not a clear-cut subject. While yes, a lot of us believe that one's genes shouldn't determine where one is allowed to live, we also can't dismiss the fact that historically Europeans felt very justified in forcefully going and settling lands where other people already lived because they felt they should just do so, and in the process exterminating the indigenous people and cultures. It's a more nuanced discussion that can be done in a few sentences, but I don't think it deserves a ban.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

https://lemmy.world/post/36586419

And MeanwhileOnGrad thanks to SmugJesus is using this as proof we're tankies, somehow.

But they don't brigade us! And Goat definitely isn't Pug's friend!

Yet another one for "anyone I disagree with is Tankie."

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Nuance is apparently just a city in France. Love that monkey doing whataboutism in the comments, as if I said "only Europeans can do colonialism".

Also SmugJesus being an incredibly uncharitable pos to claim my words support "ethnic cleansing"

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

The person who is a known liar, and replies to db0 users knowing they can't read his posts is being wrong? Unheard of.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 days ago

we also can't dismiss the fact that historically Europeans felt very justified in forcefully going and settling lands where other people already lived because they felt they should just do so, and in the process exterminating the indigenous people and cultures. It's a more nuanced discussion that can be done in a few sentences, but I don't think it deserves a ban.

I wholeheartedly agree. But again: bringing genetics into this is racist-pilled.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago

Again, not clear cut like that, since the aggressive party is indeed very much a settler-colonial project.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 days ago

I agree. But you can critizise them without arguing with genetics.

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Depending on the motivation

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 days ago

Do you feel the same about First Nations rights? About Ukrainians? Or does it just make you uncomfortable in the context of Palestinians? Are Indians from India? Or South Africans from South Africa? I fear you may have some implicit bias in play here.

One of the big false claims is that Palestinians are solely from the Arabian peninsula when that’s just unequivocally false. They’re indigenous to the Levant and it’s an important distinction to fight Zionist propoganda. Palestinians have the right to argue against being ethnically cleansed by stating their multigenerational ties to their home. Just like any First Nations people or other nationality. You’re concerned about weaponization of ethnonationalist rhetoric in a context where the power dynamics simply do not support such a concept.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
16 points (73.5% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1443 readers
442 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS