37
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

It's about time all those math types learned to relax a bit. These numbers in these spreadsheets don't need to be exact all the time. It's really more about the overall flavor of the spreadsheet than how "right" any individual field is. Error bars are there for a reason people!

[-] dgriffith@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's really more about the overall flavor of the spreadsheet than how "right" any individual field is.

Just like the Xerox copier/scanners that helpfully kept scanned images small by reusing parts of the image elsewhere. Like, all these 6s on your scanned invoices can totally be replaced with 8s. There's just a tiny degradation in the overall image, it shouldn't be a problem!

Xerox should have just called it AI compression and people would have been throwing money at them.

[-] xkbx@startrek.website 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

“Please calculate the totals to reflect a favourable result”

[-] chunes@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds like what accountants do already

[-] eRac@lemmings.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Accountants tally the numbers and hand you the totals. Twisting them is unethical and can lead to them losing their licenses.

Analysts manipulate the numbers to push a message. No ethics allowed.

Signed, an analyst raised by an accountant. Interacting with other analysts is infuriating.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Trillions of dollars to develop a calculator that's wrong sometimes.

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 2 weeks ago

AI Agents having access to the functionality of Excel means that they won’t be wrong with the actual calculations though, since it doesn’t do 5x10 in the LLM but instead uses excels built in functions to do it.

AI and excel are a match made in heaven tbh. Same with AI and databases.

[-] setsubyou@lemmy.world -5 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, most calculators are wrong quite often

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

this one is just wrongerer

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

No, the user is wrong quite often, the calculator gives the answer to the question asked, not the answer to the question the user wanted to ask.

Garbage in, garbage out.

[-] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

I've never seen a calculator being wrong, and I'm genuinely curious what you're talking about.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Only when people use the wrong input, garbage in and garbage out.

In the same vein I can't think of any instance where excel had calculated things wrong unless there was a fault in the formula that I made.

[-] setsubyou@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

That’s funny because I grew up with math teachers constantly telling us that we shouldn’t trust them.

Normal calculators that don’t have arbitrary precision have all the same problems you get when you use floating point types in a programming language. E.g. 0.1+0.2==0.3 evaluates to false in many languages. Or how adding very small numbers to very large numbers might result in the larger number as is.

If you’ve only used CAS calculators or similar you might not have seen these too since those often do arbitrary precision arithmetics, but the vast majority of calculators is not like that. They might have more precision than a 32 bit float though.

[-] wucking_feardo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Now, that's a fine hair to be splitting.

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Some computer scientists really went "we made a computer that is programmed in a different way and is sometimes correct" and these idiot corpos went "wow put it in everything"

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Excel is the fucking backbone of Microsoft Office. It's solid and backwards compatible for a couple of decades. Excel is the one reason business sticks with Office. It never fails, everyone knows it, nothing can replace it. You cannot trust any other spreadsheet to perfectly translate if you move away from Excel. The world runs on Excel.

I never imagined Microsoft would fuck with Excel. Ever. There's a fairy tale about killing the golden goose, can't remember how it goes.

[-] PKscope@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Just look what they're doing with their Xbox brand. One of the most well established brands in the most profitable entertainment sector and they are literally setting fire to it in every conceivable direction.

Microsoft must be taking business cues from GRRM... Kill all your main characters.

[-] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Forget Xbox, look at how they're treating Windows lately. Loaded with ads and bloat, forced hardware upgrades with Win11, forced MS account sign-in with no option for local accounts unless you're running one of the Enterprise/IoT SKUs....

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm on Win11 and see almost none of the issues people like you are talking about. No doubt they exist! Maybe it's because I'm on a plain vanilla ISO and I stripped the crap out early on? Same SSD I had 4 computers ago on Win10, just get moving it over. Talk like yours makes me afraid of a fresh install!

If it's as bad as people say, I'll give up and go Debian. I was largely staying Windows so I could be familiar and support my coworkers. Unemployed now. Who cares?

[-] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

yep. it's the one tool that is incredibly versatile in the workplace and for which I do not have a replacement

are there better tools? quite often. would those tools be able to be used by anybody opening the files you are sharing with them? nope. and keeping things in the same format means it's very easy to move data across files and link things up.

forms, trackers, calculations, data logging, all easy to reference/transfer to one another and I can expect anybody on my team to be able to work with files I send them without having to teach them how to use a different program

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

And you dare not risk your financial data when plotting a migration! Been there, done that, no one ever suggested moving from Excel to another product.

[-] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Everyone else who's anti-AI:

  • What is that smell? It smells like a used diaper filled with Indian food!
  • What is that?! It smells like a turd covered in burnt hair!
  • It smells like Bigfoot's dick!
  • What is that stench?! It smells like the inside of a fake leg!
[-] Triumph@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

$20 of the time

[-] youngalfred@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago

Did he just spend the first half of the article explaining why 'copilot in excel' (not agent mode) wasn't designed for calculation tasks, them finishes with complaining that on benchmarks it fails 80% of the time?

The 54% accuracy of agent mode should be called out, not the low accuracy of the thing that wasn't designed for it.

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 2 weeks ago

54% isn’t really low when people only get 72%.

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
37 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

76282 readers
458 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS