126
submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Stuka@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Their statements says they were 'uncomfortable' temperatures.

Nah fuckers, those are DANGEROUS temperatures. This just wasn't an uncomfortable wait, this shit is serious

Of course this isn't an unpopular opinion but I absolutely loathe air travel. It's always a stain on any trip I take. I just got back from a trip where every connecting flight was missed by the fault of the airline. Who schedules for 1.5 hours to land, deboard, customs, security, and transit to another terminal at DFW? Why is the standard to do maintenance checks during boarding?

Now I'm not super familiar with how the systems work, but on most planes the AC doesn't seem to work until they can start the engines. Atleast that's been the case for almost every Boeing and other smaller regional jet makers. But with my most recent trip we were on A321s and those fuckers were frosty all the time. It was 102 outside and I was cold as fuck waiting for pushback.

I guess my point is, we need more laws on how long a reasonable wait is while boarded, and stricter regulations for high/low Temps.. which can be averted by whatever the fuck Airbus is doing on the vomit comet A321

[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Before pushback, the plane's AC is provided with power over connections with the terminal, I believe. If a plane's sitting on the tarmac (this would be after pushback), it's not getting AC.

[-] Kronusdark@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

This is the sort of thing that is going to need FAA regulations. It is cheaper to leave people waiting in the heat then to move back and let people wait at the gate.

[-] dan1101@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Apparently airlines can leave you inside a plane sitting on the tarmac 3 hours for domestic flights and 4 hours for international flights. I think those numbers are ridiculously high, especially if it's 100 degrees and the plane has no AC.

https://www.transportation.gov/individuals/aviation-consumer-protection/tarmac-delays

[-] Kronusdark@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

yea, there needs to be a exception for that.

[-] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I never fly delta, no matter how cheap the tickets are. I've never had a good experience with them.

[-] AnotherPerson@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Is there a ranking system I'm unaware of? I thought Delta was one of the better ones compared to say frontier or spirit.

[-] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Frontier and Sprint are a different tier than Delta, which is in the same tier as American Airlines. With Frontier and Sprint, you should expect everything to cost you something snd your trip to be bare bones.

Delta shouldn't be like that at all. But within its tier, it's the worst.

[-] AnotherPerson@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So what are tiers and who is in which one?

From my experience:

  1. Major - Delta, United, American Airlines
  2. Value - Southwest, JetBlue
  3. Budget - Spirit, Frontier, Allegiant

I'm not sure where Alaska and Hawaiian airlines fit in since it's been a while since I've flown with them.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I'd add Alaska Airlines to the major category.

[-] AnotherPerson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Cool, thanks.

[-] zumi@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

I'm the total opposite. I pay up to double the fare sometimes to fly Delta.

Hopefully this bad press on this incident causes some policy changes at Delta on tarmac delays. That sounds miserable and dangerous.

Exactly. I've had a much better experience with Delta than than most other major airlines.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
126 points (97.7% liked)

World News

32083 readers
981 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS