171
submitted 1 year ago by shish_mish@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] twinnie@feddit.uk 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He later told BBC Newsnight that the officers had questioned his wife on why he had travelled to the Palestinian territory, who paid for his ticket and which charity he was helping.

A spokesperson for the Met said: “On 16 October, police officers responding to a report that a man was planning to travel to a war zone attended an address in north London where they spoke with one of the occupants.

“Having identified that the man had left the UK for humanitarian purposes, the officers signposted the occupant to current FCDO advice.”

How is that harassment or an attempt to silence them?

[-] archiotterpup@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

They didn't need to question anyone.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I agree. The police have a duty to investigate people travelling to high risk areas, to confirm they're not travelling for some sort of terrorism training only to come back and do something horrid. They were doing their due diligence.

If the doctor had actually gone into detail and described the "harassment", then maybe that would be different, but all we have is him saying "they harassed my family" and the police statement gives the detail.


FYI, you should put > in front of each line to do a quote in Markdown. Lemmy is also different to reddit in that you need to put them in the blank lines to make a continuous quote. Like this:

He later told BBC Newsnight that the officers had questioned his wife on why he had travelled to the Palestinian territory, who paid for his ticket and which charity he was helping.

A spokesperson for the Met said: “On 16 October, police officers responding to a report that a man was planning to travel to a war zone attended an address in north London where they spoke with one of the occupants.

“Having identified that the man had left the UK for humanitarian purposes, the officers signposted the occupant to current FCDO advice.”

If you were just trying to do italics, then you need to do it for each paragraph, I think.

[-] ProIsh@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Hopefully in London it's better but you shouldn't just take the cops word as fact.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Sad to see this for the surgeon.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

It doesn't really sound like harassment. They spoke with his wife, she satisfied them it was for humanitarian purposes, they pointed her towards the official advice about travelling to war zones. That sounds like standard procedure.

The doctor himself doesn't provide any detail. He just says they "harassed" his family, but doesn't describe any form of harassment.

Would it be better that police didn't investigate people who take trips overseas to countries with high terrorist activity?

[-] ProIsh@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Is that polices role? I thought that was more border security. You think cops are going to find the sneaky terrorists? If he'd have said "I'm going to defend the motherland!!!" then do they arrest him? What charges and jerisdiction were they following here?

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Border security work at the border. This sort of thing is exactly the kind of thing that would be delegated to local police.

If he’d have said “I’m going to defend the motherland!!!” then do they arrest him?

If his wife said that (as he is currently in Gaza), they would probably deny him re-entry. There would be no charges for anything, it's just an investigation. As for jurisdiction, they have it.

The UK has previously been the victim of terrorist attacks involving UK residents travelling overseas for training. Hell, there's even a documentary about it, called Four Lions.

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Calling Four Lions a documentary is kinda funny

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Rubber dinghy rapids bro :D :D

I actually saw them filming establishing shots for the movie in Sheffield, doing these panning in shots to their house from a cliff near where I lived. They were really cagey about it though, they wouldn't tell us much about it or the even title, they said it was "about a prison break". The London Marathon scene was also filmed in Sheffield, they blew up one of the shops on Wicker St, then that place was remodelled into somewhere qutie nice.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In this case its this group of police's role. They're tied up with MI5 and Home Office. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counter_Terrorism_Policing

US has something similar https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Terrorism_Task_Force

[-] TheLordHumungus@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Where is the harassment? Dumbass

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
171 points (91.7% liked)

News

23161 readers
3062 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS