32
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

Microsoft is doing more for Linux adoption than anyone else ever has lol

[-] zewm@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Valve with Steamdeck and Proton development: “Am I a joke to you?”

[-] SaltSong@startrek.website 3 points 1 month ago

They are helping, yes, but windows 11 is a driving force like I've never seen.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

It's only really viable though, because of Steam and Proton

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

That and backwards compatibility for Win7 & Win10. Shares of those OSs have gone up and several application developers have announced continued support or are advocating for unlocking/keeping secure those OSs.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago
[-] Vakbrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Honestly, big shoutout to Microsoft for the strong push to get me in Linux's loving embrace.

Double shoutout to them for making it very easy to not even considering to come back.

[-] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I have said the same as well. Prior to them dropping the fat grumpy that is 11, I was all in on the windows ecosystem for myself. I heavily modified it of course so it didn't have a bunch of the nonsense but overall, the experience was good. But then they started warping 10, and then they came out with 11 which was massive garbage at release and now is worse garbage years down the road. And with that AI outlook, I'm full on bailing from everything.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

MS has to justify thier cost of spending so much money on AI datacenters, they need everyone to buy it to offset the unprofitable cost of AI usage. thats why they are so desperate and suddenly trying to force W11 down peoples throat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] melfie@lemy.lol 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Making every Windows 11 PC an AI PC

Great, so everything runs locally, making it a self-contained “AI PC”. Otherwise, the headline surely would’ve been, “Making every PC collect data to train Microsoft’s models with little benefit in return“. Right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

With 68% of consumers reporting using AI to support their decision making, voice is making this easier. [1]

Does anybody actually believe that 68% of consumers use or even want Copilot? But they included a source for this very generous assertion at the bottom of the page:

[1] Based on Microsoft-commissioned online study of U.S. consumers ages 13 years of age or older conducted by Edelman DXI and Assembly, 1,000 participants, July 2025.

Oh yeah, that's compelling: US consumers, 13 years old and older. An entire thousand of them!

So the only question I have left is which junior high principal Microsoft "compensated" for this survey, and what happened to the 320 summer school attendees who said fuck you, no anyway.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago
  • 68% of people who answered the survey full of loaded questions they sent to a curated demographic
[-] UltraMagnus@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

When google shoves their ai to the top of search results, its hard not to read it. I've been spoiled by ublock and I am no longer used to ignoring the first few things that come up.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I've been using Duckduckgo with uBlock for years, so I had no real problems with anything like the hell of Google "sponsored content" until Duckduckgo started putting up their own AI search assistant. Since then I've gone from start.duckduckgo.com to noai.duckduckgo.com because I got tired of turning their search assist off and couldn't reliably block it with uBlock because they kept changing it. (I delete all cookies after every browser session and do not maintain individual app accounts, so their AI settings options were never gonna work for me.)

Because of the way my brain works, I literally don't even want to see what AI says until I've done my own looking. Yet I never failed to turn it off, because I just can't rely on it.

Usually when I'm looking for something I'm in a hurry, so it's less trouble for me to just pick my own sources, preferably older than 2023 if possible, and read a bit myself than to spend time getting blithely lied to, or even just suspect hallucination/omission to the point that I think I need to verify it before I can rely on it.

It's not an exaggeration to say that for me, it is literally faster to skim three or four completely different primary sources than it is to try to verify the assertions in a single search assist paragraph: one is just light reading, the other is point by point comparison of the AI offering against multiple independent sources. So I read.

I've never regretted summarizing a topic myself, but I've definitely gotten some rotten eggs from AI, both in blatant non-truths AND in holes of omission you could drive a truck through. I won't make that mistake again. So for me, AI summaries are well worth staying wary of for now.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

My favorite is when AI summary answers a question, then the links from the search below contradict that answer. It's shit for biomedical research.

load more comments (23 replies)
[-] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Microsoft is so incredibly fucked when the AI bubble starts to burst. They've abandoned so many of their other projects and customers to go all-in on it.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I dunno. I feel like they are like the cable company now. They will jus sit there twiddling their nipples while we are all fucked.

[-] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

I need the cable company (or similar) due to the fact that infrastructure is hard to deploy, and we need Internet to participate in society.

Nobody needs Microsoft cause every single one of their products has an alternative that's at least as good.

They survive by courting enterprises, but many of them can also switch away if they want.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

How long until they successfully lobby the US government to make FOSS illegal somehow

[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

An image from South Park. Two Cable Company Employees rubbing their nipples through square patch holes cut out from their shirts

Oh really, how bummed would they be?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I keep parroting this, but in the next couple of years, I think there will be a couple of giants that fall. I work in ServiceNow and they, like many others, have gone all in on AI. Their problem is that they were slower than some, their solution is half baked at best, and it's prohibitively expensive. Nobody is paying 10s of thousands+ extra for the licensing to be able to run agents, and less are paying the extra licensing required for the users to be able to use that agent.

I've now been pulled into copilot studio, and yet again it's another product rushed to market that isn't ready for the big stage. Dog shit documentation and training material, and terrible environment design.

All of these big players have invested so much money in adding AI, nobody wants it, and now they're all hemoragging money.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

Meanwhile I'm making every one of my computers Linux.

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

At this point, regular use of AI should forbid you from voting. It not only means that you can't make decisions on your own, but that your choice can be affected by the people owning the AI service.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I asked copilot...

How would Microsoft loyalty to US or other government's national security possibly compromise a user's PC if that user gives copilot permission to operate their PC?

How national-security or law-enforcement demands could lead to compromise

  • Compelled access to data Microsoft controls — If Microsoft stores or indexes any of your Copilot data in the cloud, Microsoft can be required by lawful process to produce that data to U.S. or other governments with legal jurisdiction.
  • Compelled changes to services — Governments can issue orders that require providers to change logging, enable access, or install monitoring in ways that may be secret or accompanied by gag orders.
  • Access to telemetry and diagnostics — Diagnostic or telemetry data that Copilot or Windows collects can include evidence of your activity and may be producible under legal request.
  • Local features that capture content — Features designed to assist (for example, an automated “Recall” that snapshots screens) create local records of sensitive material that increase exposure risk if accessed by an authorized party.
  • Remote-control or agent capabilities — If Copilot is granted elevated permissions (input control, script execution, system configuration), those same capabilities could be exercised under legal compulsion or via back-end access mechanisms.
  • Software updates and maintenance — Lawful orders can compel vendors to ship updates or config changes that alter how a product behaves, increasing access to user systems.

Practical ways those legal obligations could manifest on your PC

  • Production of synced or cloud-stored Copilot logs, prompts, or screenshots to authorities.
  • Microsoft being required to provide live access or historical logs from back-end services that the Copilot agent uses.
  • A secret court order or national security letter forcing Microsoft to enable additional logging, monitoring, or remote access for a targeted account or device.
  • Disclosure of keys, tokens, or server-side records that tie on-device events to your identity.

Why elevated permissions matter

  • Read access to files and memory lets an agent capture documents, credentials, or keys.
  • Input/automation control enables actions on your behalf (open files, send messages, change settings).
  • Persistence (services/agents) makes it easier for any compelled access to be effective and harder for you to detect or disable.

Risk-reduction steps you can take now

  • Limit permissions: Grant only the minimal Copilot privileges needed; avoid giving input control, admin rights, or system-level automation.
  • Disable features that capture content: Turn off any screen-snapshot or automatic indexing/Recall-like features if you don’t need them.
  • Avoid cloud syncing for sensitive data: Keep sensitive files off services that sync or index them in the cloud.
  • Prefer on-device-only models: Use local-only AI modes when available so prompts and context do not leave your machine.
  • Use full-disk and file-level encryption with keys you control; avoid storing keys where the vendor could be compelled to retrieve them.
  • Harden account security: Use strong, unique passwords and MFA on accounts tied to Copilot or Microsoft services.
  • Audit logs and telemetry: Review and reduce diagnostic/telemetry settings; regularly review logs for unexpected activity.
  • Segmentation: Use a separate machine or VM for highly sensitive work so a general-purpose Copilot-enabled device doesn’t hold those secrets.
  • Legal & contractual protections: For high-risk contexts, seek contractual commitments, data residency options, or legal counsel about how a vendor handles lawful demands.

Quick practical checklist

  • Turn off automatic screenshot/Recall features.
  • Remove admin permissions from Copilot agent.
  • Keep sensitive work on a non-synced, encrypted volume.
  • Use local-only AI options where offered.
  • Enable and monitor endpoint and network logging for unusual remote access.

Short conclusion Allowing Copilot to operate your PC raises the surface where lawful government demands or compelled actions could expose data or enable access. The likelihood and scope depend on which features you enable (especially cloud sync, screen capture, and elevated permissions) and the legal jurisdiction over the vendor or the data. Minimize permissions, disable content-capture features, and isolate truly sensitive workflows to reduce exposure.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

So uhm, copilot just told us not to use these new copilot features.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago
  _____ _   _  ____ _  __   ___  _____ _____ 
 |  ___| | | |/ ___| |/ /  / _ \|  ___|  ___|
 | |_  | | | | |   | ' /  | | | | |_  | |_   
 |  _| | |_| | |___| . \  | |_| |  _| |  _|  
 |_|    \___/ \____|_|\_\  \___/|_|   |_|    
                                             
[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

First steps of windows install:

  1. No to everything for data monitoring
  2. Google or Opera default browser
  3. Disable or ignore all copilot icons
  4. Unstick all user folders from OneDrive
  5. TranslucentTB
[-] Joelk111@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

You forgot the step where you ignore step 2 and use Firefox.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

google as default browser

You sweet summer child, Google is as bad if not even worse than Microsoft. Chrome is no longer the browser the memes that glazed it used to depict it as.

[-] eddyizm@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

return of the clippy, now named skynet.

[-] Krudler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Pro tip: Buy great laptops on Marketplace, use Rufus to make an ISO which bypasses the RAM and TPM requirements and lets you make a local account, install Win11 and resell for 2x what you paid

I've been rolling in cash with this for the past month

E oh you guys don't like that lmao 😂😂😂 too bad for you, most people still want windows, I'm there to capitalize on it!!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I was pondering about updating that dying w10 partition, just in case. Well, looks like someone else put the final nail in that coffin for me.

[-] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

With 68% of consumers reporting using AI to support their decision making, voice is making this easier.

sure, maybe as a reference tool. not as fucking something that can perform actions on my computer

Second, it should be able to see what you see and be able to offer guided support. And third, it should be able to take action on your behalf.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Oh thank God. I need more AI in my life to be useless

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
32 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

77118 readers
413 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS