97

Independent Senator Bernie Sanders floated Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a potential presidential candidate in the 2028 elections, saying that even though it's "her decision to make," she is a "very, very good politician."

Speaking to Axios, Sanders said that he has been "out on the streets with her" and noticed how she responds when people come up to her. "It's so incredibly genuine and open."

Ocasio-Cortez is seemingly positioning herself to run for higher office, whether it is challenging Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for his seat or to make a run for president.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] the_q@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago

I really don't understand the comments on these types of posts. Everyone is like "she should do the Senate I'm not sure she's right/ready for president". Why? Our current president is an 80 year old pedophile, our previous president was an 80 year old likeable moron...

You guys don't want change you want you return to the status quo.

[-] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 8 points 1 month ago

I don’t think it’s a matter of her being ready, I think it’s that she has a real chance of beating schumer, whereas with the presidency, I’m not even sure she could even manage to win the primary. If an old white dude like Bernie couldn’t beat Hilary and Biden, what chance does a Latina woman in her 30s have?

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

If an old white dude like Bernie couldn’t beat Hilary and Biden, what chance does a Latina woman in her 30s have?

I mean, if you completely ignore the DNC doing everything legally in their power to get in the way of Bernie and force feed Hilary in the first place... because they can't allow anyone vocal about actual progressive ideas in a position of party power... yeah that's what it looks like. But that's a pretty big thing to just ignore.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

We want this madness to end and to do that we need to appeal to the same sort of folks who buy Chevy Equinoxes.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

Fuck em and fuck that weak shit.

The neoliberals fucked up and can get out of the way forever or we might as well ride this bitch of a species screaming into the abyss.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I totally agree but every damn car looks like an Equinox so I don’t think we can win a popularity contest.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I really hate to say this, but there’s no way a woman will win in 2028 (if an election even happens).

The vast centrist vote will go towards stability and a return to the ‘values’ they think have been lost.

It sucks a lot, but the only viable choice will be a white man. I hate this, but it’s true.

Walz is probably the most politically viable choice. Does that suck? Yeah. But pragmatically, it’s just true.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 month ago

Sorry to be crass, but fuck that. Is anyone excited about the generic geriatric white male candidate? Tons of people love AOC and Bernie, too, for that matter. I think we need a candidate that actually inspires people. Someone that people want to vote for, volunteer for, canvas for, etc. Maybe I'm just a dreamer, though.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

Hey man, I’m with you. This sucks a lot.

This situation is fucking terrible. Personally, I’d prefer Bernie would run himself, but he clearly doesn’t want to (and given his age, I can’t blame him).

To be completely honest, though, he’s got sort of a bad track record of backing other candidates, so if he’s endorsing AOC, that’s even more evidence she won’t win.

I agree with him on most things, and I’d absolutely back him as a candidate like 10 years ago, but he’s not a kingmaker. I wish we lived in a better world, but we don’t. Our world is fucking awful, politically speaking.

[-] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Frankly, I’ll vote for any democrat that challenges Trump. My logic is that only the Democratic Party has ANY actual shot at winning, so whether it’s AOC, Bernie, or he’ll even Vermin Supreme if they put him on the ballot. I will vote for a fucking brick if it’s a democrat and challenges Trump. It almost certainly cannot get worse.

Edit: and before people say Trump won’t be on the ballot in 2028… I wouldn’t be so sure about that lol. You hear/see the shit this guy says/does?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

white geriatric walking dead

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

All of American Politics for $500, Alex.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Bahnd@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Support for what ever she decides is next, although I feel like the senate would be a better step. However the democrats dont really have a face to back that isnt some centerist that thinks its ok to play with the bully after they have taken your lunch money or someone that is older than Wonder Bread (tm).

[-] Canconda@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Imagine if AOC remained SML as long as Moscow Mitch.

[-] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

AOC the SML of the USA

[-] troy_frizzell@mstdn.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm not sold on his face, but I do like the way Pritzker swings a bat. He's a bit centrist, but at least he's a fighter.

His problem is he's a billionaire. But as a stop gap, I think he could work.

[-] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

At this point, he is a billionaire by choice. He could donate to groups that work towards equitable living for the marginalized, but he doesn't. He only has a couple billion, but that's enough to make a very real impact for a lot of vulnerable people. This is very nearly the trolley problem. He can do nothing and let a lot of people die or he can intervene and save most but not all.

As Rush said (the band, not Limbaugh lol), If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They are going to basically offer her Chuck's Senate seat, unopposed, as long as she doesn't go after the nomination that they have already awarded to Newsom. He's the Next One Up!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BannedVoice@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

Adorable President with a solid political background and a good head on her shoulders?

YAS QUEEN!!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] qarbone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I appreciate Bernie for being an adult and helping to boost up the people that will be here after him.

Most every other politician, when they aren't cramming their unqualified, entitled broodspawn where they don't belong, is gnawing off limbs trying to make sure they're entombed with their positions like the pharaohs.

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lol the DNC has chosen Newsom as the new golden boy.

The DNC would run the corpse of Hillary Clinton again before letting a progressive have power.

I would love for AOC to actually be allowed to be voted on, because she would probably win the popular vote like progressives almost always do.

[-] Canconda@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

I don't know if AOC is the right pick but I do know she's closer to the target than Gavin Newsom. Nothing against him, but the Democratic party needs a candidate that can inspire people.

But that's getting ahead of things. First the american people need to primary ~50% of sitting democrats in the midterms.

[-] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

There's plenty to be against Newsome for considering he platformed fascists, attacks the homeless for fun, and isn't supportive of the LGBTQ+ community.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

I think she is smart enough to surround herself with intelligent people. And Newsom seems to have a much bigger ego which is not what I'm interested in, personally.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I'm not sure she has the thunder she had in 2018. BUT If she calls for a general strike in the next 6 weeks, and then starts to be the lead organizer of said strike, she's my gal. I really hope she learns from Bernie in specifically how he's organized his national campaigns.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 1 points 1 month ago

I don't see anyone better for the job.

Certainly not that transphobic piece of shit from California, that's for damn sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

You all know that next US president will be Donald Trump Jr, 5-6 terms, maybe more. It's scary but possible. Trump (demented one) is working on that.

[-] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago
[-] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Fucking great question. With 77% of dems currently agreeing that Isreal is committing genocide, the wrong answer to this question is going to be disqualifying for a lot of constituents.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I vote yes.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
97 points (98.0% liked)

politics

26660 readers
920 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS