6
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by nemeski@mander.xyz to c/workreform@lemmy.world

‘Some may ask why we’re reducing roles when the company is performing well,’ an executive admitted, blaming AI for the layoffs.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This has nothing to do with AI, consumers don't have any cash left and sales are falling off a cliff. Remember how they had to extend Prime Days?

"Blames AI" is a weird way to put it, and I think that was on purpose, to deflect comments from the real reason. Not talking about the recession we are currently in is the equivalent of going to the pub and waiting for it blow over.

Executives replace human talent with the scam they are trying to sell, servers collapse.

somehow, it's not the executive's fault.

fucking twats.

[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

What investors need to realize and reward, is that replacing the expensive employees will save more money faster. Starting with the executives puts all that money back in your pockets.

AI won't sabotage your brand like Elon Musk. AI won't steal from you by writing a masturbatorial book about itself on Company time like Jack Welch. It won't waste investor dollars on a private jet so it can work from home and commute from another city like Brian Niccol.

AI executives will never need salaries or stock options. Will never have publically embarrasing affairs at coldplay concerts. Will never get sued for sexual harrassment. Don't need golden parachutes etc...

It's the right thing to do and the right time to do it.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Galetti also espoused the benefits of AI in her message to employees, and claimed the oft-criticized technology is already allowing companies like Amazon to "innovate much faster than ever before." She suggested it's important for the company to reduce its headcount in order to take advantage of the perceived opportunity presented by the tech.

This screams of, we need to cut heads so we can pretend to be innovating with AI somehow Most likely, they are just hiding all the sunken AI investment that has returned nothing in terms of revenue

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

This was always the plan, always why they were excited about AI, and even after it blows up in their faces, they're gonna keep pursuing it.

[-] morgan_423@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I'm still trying to figure out how every CEO wants to replace nearly the entire workforce with AI, but somehow still thinks that anyone in society will be able to buy their products after they do that. Make it make sense.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That’s like 14 mid sized businesses all cut down at once. Why didn’t those 14,000 people work hard enough to become billionaires?

[-] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Increase ownership is just a buzz word for giving more work to less people

[-] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

It's not AI, that's just their current excuse. They will just make remaining employees do more work for the same pay.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

“Some may ask why we’re reducing roles when the company is performing well,” Galetti wrote. “This generation of AI is the most transformative technology we’ve seen since the Internet, and it’s enabling companies to innovate much faster than ever before (in existing market segments and altogether new ones). We’re convicted that we need to be organized more leanly.”

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
6 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

14451 readers
13 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS