10
submitted 3 weeks ago by IndridCold@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

“If Republicans want to join us in lowering costs for working families, they have the chance to do so. And if they do not come to the table, they will own the premium increases they cause."

What a load of shit. Fat good it does to people who can't afford healthcare who "owns" their misery: they'll be the ones who are miserable, while the "owners" sit on their piles of cash and play politicians for a living...

[-] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago

Democrats aren't even capitalizing on it. Unless it's hidden in the ads I'm blocking, I'm not seeing anything to show people that it's Republicans behind it all. But I can point to a dozen locations that (re)print Trump's unhinged rants on the subject.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Who owns those channels again?

[-] switcheroo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Fuck you x8

[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

Well, 7 democrats and John Fetterman...

[-] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

6 democrats, John Fetterman, and one steaming pile of Durbin.

[-] Death__BySnuSnu@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I think you meant one tiny Dick.

[-] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Everyone in Illinois is just waiting to get rid of durbin. Pos. He voted for the BBB too.

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago

They have a cave troll.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 weeks ago

If evil space aliens from mars came to earth and demanded we hand over John Fetterman or else, would there be any pushback to the aliens at all?

[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

John Fetterman belongs in a mental institution. His noggin is broken - which makes him more akin to a Republican than to a normal functioning adult.

[-] TommyJohnsFishSpot@lemy.lol 2 points 3 weeks ago

This Nevadan is fucking pissed.

[-] Triumph@fedia.io 2 points 3 weeks ago
[-] harbard@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago

One of the biggest proofs that politicians only stand for re-election.

[-] almost1337@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

They were all chosen to fall on the sword because they're not up for re-election in 2026

[-] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 weeks ago

Vote them out. End their careers, every last one of them.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

A lot of them aren’t up for reelection before the goldfish populace forgets about this entirely.

[-] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 weeks ago

So we remind them. Preferably by fielding candidates that will actually fight for us, and aren't afraid to point that fact out. Loudly.

Building up a real base of support takes time. As in, 4-5 years worth of time. Might as well get started while people are pissed.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 0 points 3 weeks ago

Um... at this rate in 4-5 years America will be a fascist hellscape. There is no 4-5 years.

[-] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

The best time to plant a tree...

Organizing is organizing. If you have enough people in your corner to win an election, you have enough people to blow up a bridge.

Or has everyone forgotten why we hold elections in the first place? Voting is a proxy for fighting. If they won't hold a fair election, make them. Remind the oligarchs why we have elections in the first place.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

I’ve been at it for 25 years and it still hasn’t happened

[-] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

Mamdani won. He seems like the real deal, too.

If he can do it, we can too. We'll build a whole new party if we have to, but we'll get people in office who will actually fight for us.

[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social -1 points 3 weeks ago

What good would that do? You realize than none of those fuckers need to work, right?

[-] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

What good would that do?

It would get them out of office???

this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
10 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26586 readers
597 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS