15
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JackLSauce@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It took many re-reads to realize this is about the game Rust running on Linux, not the language Rust running on Linux

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

For a solid 10 seconds, I was transported to a reality where Mozilla shunted development of Rust off to some random studio who were removing Linux support because it wasn't in the budget.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

I'm an idiot and even I can smell the bullshit coming off of this post.

Last I checked every cheat website I ever saw/got advertised/etc were selling windows executables with the swipe of a credit card.

This cry of "Linux is for cheaters!" is just the gaming equivalent of "Wont someone think of the children?!". a stupid slogan used by assholes to push their opinion/agenda in defiance of facts and reality.

[-] khepri@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

"It's way harder to get our malware to work on Linux" is more or less what I took away from that.

[-] msokiovt@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yep, spyware is the key, and they don't like that Linux users don't get easily spied on.

yes, but i think it's total bullshit aksing Proton user to buy the game and then $15 worth of DLC. I'd be pissed if I were forced to do that.

So, your solution is to completely deny access to the game for all Linux users, even those who've already purchased it? Total bullshit.

[-] Vikthor@piefed.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Technically they don't deny access to the game. The game runs with Proton, but you can't connect to the EAC secured servers.

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

I don't play rust does it support private servers out of box?

[-] turdas@suppo.fi 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yes it does, and there are at least some non-EAC servers with a whitelist system that Linux users can play on.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

And that's honestly how all anticheat should work: opt in if you're okay with the spyware, or don't if you're comfortable finding a other solution.

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

They should refund for sure

[-] msokiovt@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago

The LiNuX pLaYeRs ChEaT excuse. It's bullspit, and they know it. That's because they can't spy on Linux players very easily unless someone makes an OPSEC mistake.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

No, it's more that cheaters go for the easiest option. If that's Linux, then they'll use Linux.

The issue isn't Linux users, but game devs/anticheat devs not putting in the effort to find a proper solution.

[-] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago

This is a misrepresentation of what he said, though. He’s claiming the cheaters (who happen to use Linux) outweigh the regular Linux users (0.01%), which is statistically plausible. Also please chill the edgelord “OPSEC” attitude, we get it..you are Mr.hackerman. (The term you probably meant was privacy or freedom I’m guessing)

[-] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is so sad, because rust is kinda the perfect example of a game where moderators or deputization could handle cheaters. Instead of a matchmaking system, you just join a server and play there. Why not ensure those servers have active moderators to ban cheaters?

I stopped gaming (for now?), but I'm still really fond of what happened with SCP secret labaratory, which had 20-40 player lobbies. There would almost always be a mod online, and I could get cheaters kicked instantly when by reporting them in the menu, then a mod would spectate them, and then they would get banned.

Rust seems to have more players per server (a quick search says some of the extra mega ultra large servers go up to 900 people), but it does have a distinct server model, with admins and mods.

EDIT: the other fun stuff of having active and actually good mods was when they ran fun events. Like I remember they set up a sharks and minnows type game mode instead of the regular stuff. Fun times.

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

Obligatory fuck Gary Newman

[-] Cosmonaut_Collin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Man, being a Linux user, I need to be careful about my relationship with my wife. According to this guy all Linux users are cheaters.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's [proton/linux] a vector for cheat development

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Bc windows isn't a real development environment :p

[-] vapeloki@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Funny, let's see how this looks after the the GabeCube drops and hopefully with a similar impact as the Steam Deck. I keep my popcorn ready

[-] 30p87@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ah, and not being able to play the game I bought for 40 fucking dollars is of course fine then.

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Can't you refund? Stating that the devs intentionally broke the game for you?

[-] DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I dont know if you still can. However when this change was announced I did refund it through Steam way past the 2 hour mark without issue.

Did the same thing with Rocket League, I think.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oh, I mean, that makes sense.

I was in the FacePunch forums since before Garry's Mod was sold for money.

Garry is a giant asshole troll, and also rather bad at coding.

One neat side effect of him nuking the old forums was that it removed all the documentation of him...

  • Banning people who solved coding problems that he couldn't.

  • Intentionally breaking widely used addons and game modes, purely out of spite, because he thought they were stupid, or didn't like some particular creators or users of them.

  • Writing documentation that was wrong, people telling him it was documented wrong, then banning the people who told him that, then fixing the code and documentation using the suggestions they gave.

etc etc...

EAC works on Linux, btw.

https://linuxvox.com/blog/easy-anti-cheat-linux/

It uh, it has since 2022.

https://boilingsteam.com/enabling-eac-support-on-linux-now-easier/index.html

Halo Master Chief Edition, Halo Infinite, Hunt Showdown, Squad, New World...

All these work on linux, with EAC.

https://areweanticheatyet.com/?search=&sortOrder=&sortBy=status

Some devs are just worse at their jobs, and get very defensive, accusatory, blustery about it.

Others are willing to put in the effort and work with the support EAC provides to them, for specifically this purpose, instead of making up bullshit, insulting other dev teams, and saying that, apparently, none of these (or other) games are 'serious about anti-cheat'.

[-] juipeltje@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

After reading the title i was like "wait, is this about the game, the programming language, the movie, or corrosion?" Too many damn things called rust these days lol

[-] turdas@suppo.fi 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm sure he's at least mostly right about the cheating thing, because in many cases the Linux-compatible EAC binary is just a stub with literally no detections of any kind. And even if they did have detections, given that the EAC runs within Wine they'd have no way of detecting something as simple as information cheats (wallhacks, ESP) that read /proc/$(pidof rust.exe)/maps from Linux userspace. For a game like Rust, such cheats are probably the most popular ones.

What I do seriously doubt is his claim of Linux users making up "less than .01% of the total player base". It just seems incongruent with the total Linux user market share on Steam. Though he does qualify it by saying this stat is from when they stopped supporting Linux, i.e. 2019. The situation is obviously quite different now with Linux being at 3% total and ~6% of English-language users on Steam, so if it's not an outright lie it's at least very disingenuous.

[-] rbos@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

The Rust builds for Linux were incredibly buggy at the time. I wouldn't be super surprised if the numbers were lower than in the general gamer population. But 0.01% is obviously ridiculous.

[-] jrgd@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

To note, even if the claim of 'more cheaters than Linux players' at the end of lifecycle is true, it is a blatant lie by omission. I played Rust from 2016 til shortly after the game went out of Early Access. I stopped playing because Facepunch had completely ruined the Linux builds of the game by removing the long-standing OpenGL output and forcing the new (at the time to Unity) and completely untested Vulkan output as the only option on Linux. For anyone unfortunate enough to experience playing Rust at the end of its Linux run, the game would regularly have major graphical glitches and various rendering errors, including graphical artifacting that would be seizure inducing. If you are prone to epilepsy or otherwise sensitive to bright or flashing lights, please do not click this link. To note, the attached video is a mild case of what commonly happened when playing. That is, if the crashes and many hardware just no longer being able to launch the game properly didn't impede that.

Given all of that, I genuinely wouldn't be surprised if the only "people" running the Linux client were actually cheat bots because there is no way many people were actually still playing the absolute rugpull of a game toward the end of its life.

[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org -1 points 2 weeks ago

Please explain why the devs care about cheating.

Seriously - what harm does it do to them?

[-] MotoAsh@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's a multiplayer game. Cheaters ruin other peoples' fun. Why is that difficult to infer on your own?

[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

rust is a game commonly overrun with hackers who hack to grief other players, as its inherently a pvp survival game that takes a while to build up

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

People don't buy games overflowing with cheaters.

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)

Linux Gaming

22261 readers
32 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS